08 Feb 08
Does it matter who gets named VP if Hill-Billy is elected? That person
and their position will be nothing, there will be a unelected Pres/VP in
Bill Clinton running around, who knows what he will do knowing he
cannot be kicked out, because how do you kick out a first
lady/husban from office?
Kelly
09 Feb 08
Originally posted by KellyJayHow much influence did Bush senior have on Bush jr.'s administration? Why would the Clintons be any different?
I wonder who ever the VP is will mind not being in all the real
important meetings with HillBilly, and maybe even with HillBilly
and their advisors?
Kelly
09 Feb 08
1 edit
Originally posted by rwingettMy personal opinion is the Bill in HillBilly is an ego maniac, but
How much influence did Bush senior have on Bush jr.'s administration? Why would the Clintons be any different?
even if I’m wrong about that Bill in that regard, he is still going to
be in the White house sleeping with the President and anyone else
who will have him. That makes that relationship quite different
than the Bush father son relationship, where the father made it a
point to get out of his son’s way. Bill they all ready have to restrain
on the campaign trail, imagine him with no responsibilities and a
lot of free time in the White House?
Kelly
09 Feb 08
Originally posted by KellyJayParanoid right-wing fantasy. Give me a break.
My personal opinion is the Bill in HillBilly is an ego maniac, but
even if I’m wrong about that Bill in that regard, he is still going to
be in the White house sleeping with the President and anyone else
who will have him. That makes that relationship quite different
than the Bush father son relationship, where the father made it a
point to get out of ...[text shortened]... n trail, imagine him with no responsibilities and a
lot of free time in the White House?
Kelly
10 Feb 08
Originally posted by KellyJayDivorce 'em?
Does it matter who gets named VP if Hill-Billy is elected? That person
and their position will be nothing, there will be a unelected Pres/VP in
Bill Clinton running around, who knows what he will do knowing he
cannot be kicked out, because how do you kick out a first
lady/husban from office?
Kelly
10 Feb 08
Originally posted by rwingettIssues of logic,checks and balances and the importance that people who run for high office place in achieving that position are not things the general pro-illiterate take into account when ruminating the latest fox sound-byte.
How much influence did Bush senior have on Bush jr.'s administration? Why would the Clintons be any different?
Its the paranoia-normal state of the stiff necked, one eyed, self indulged, I am the centre of my own universe~nothing else matters, lets consume till we all blow mindset, that actively supports war as peace and hegemonic terrorism as the vehicle to deliver universal democracy.
In short the use of reason to argue a common sense point would make as much sense to some as appealing to their sense of balance in asking them to tone down their conspicuous consumption of the earth's dwindling resources.
But I digress, and I will probably not find any resonance amongst those who are needed to make this all work.
10 Feb 08
Originally posted by kmax87Dwindling resources?
Issues of logic,checks and balances and the importance that people who run for high office place in achieving that position are not things the general pro-illiterate take into account when ruminating the latest fox sound-byte.
Its the paranoia-normal state of the stiff necked, one eyed, self indulged, I am the centre of my own universe~nothing else matter ...[text shortened]... and I will probably not find any resonance amongst those who are needed to make this all work.
'We' haven't even made a dint.
10 Feb 08
Originally posted by WajomaO2, H2O,natural wilderness, the ecosystems of far to many macrosystems the world over, but of course that doesnt matter, some engineer somewhere will invent a filter or machine or some other technology that will exploit the carnage and turn it into a profitable exercise such that never fear let us all continue the consumption without any let up.
Dwindling resources?
'We' haven't even made a dint.
Talking about the environment sucks anyway, who needs it while we can still enjoy nature?
10 Feb 08
Originally posted by kmax87H2O?
O2, H2O,natural wilderness, the ecosystems of far to many macrosystems the world over, but of course that doesnt matter, some engineer somewhere will invent a filter or machine or some other technology that will exploit the carnage and turn it into a profitable exercise such that never fear let us all continue the consumption without any let up.
Talking about the environment sucks anyway, who needs it while we can still enjoy nature?
*shriek* we're running out of water?
02? Running at about 20.9 same as it always has.
10 Feb 08
Originally posted by WajomaOh yeah I forgot there are no troubles with the water table in wajomaland.
H2O?
*shriek* we're running out of water?
02? Running at about 20.9 same as it always has.
Pollution does not exist and O2 is in plemtiful supply and environmental degradation is just a fantasy. I apologize for forgetting we live in wajomaland.
10 Feb 08
Originally posted by kmax87Is O2 a dwindling resource?
Oh yeah I forgot there are no troubles with the water table in wajomaland.
Pollution does not exist and O2 is in plemtiful supply and environmental degradation is just a fantasy. I apologize for forgetting we live in wajomaland.
Straight question requiring a straight answer.
10 Feb 08
Originally posted by WajomaIs the O2 being displaced by the CO2? Got some figures on that one?
Is O2 a dwindling resource?
Straight question requiring a straight answer.
Just being sill eh, but it typifies your (and others) misplaced alarmism and pessimism. I never said it was all plain sailing just that dwindling resources aren't the problem you make them out to be. As a percentage of area how much of Australia do mining operations use up? They haven't even scratched the surface of what's available. Sure fossil fuels are going to 'dwindle' one day, but not in your life time, and it won't be anything sudden, gradually the cost of recovering fossil fuels will creep up, there are untold resources sitting there waiting, just that there are easier cheaper reserves that can be used first.
As the price creeps up, (and it is still incredibly cheap, try pushing your car as far as a litre of gas will drive it to get an idea of the incredible amount of energy in that small package) so the push will be on for alternatives, NOT BY GUMMINT.
"We" are never going to run out of O2.
"We" are never going to run out of water, that's the problem with the great collective 'we' isn't it. Who is we? Do you mean humans? Then 'we' are never going to run out of water. There will be shortages here and there, droughts, there always has been there always will be. Maybe areas are becoming over irrigated - what do you think will happen? The cost of farming or producing crops in those areas will become too costly, there will be an adjustment and "we" will prevail.
Concerned about "natural wilderness"? Form an organisation, donate to an existing organisation, buy up land and let it go wild, you go kmax, all the best, try to look on the bright side just a little more chap, there's much to be optimistic about and so many of mans achievements to be in awe of, you're a real downer lately.
...and don't worry about the resources - 'we' really haven't made a dint yet.