07 Nov 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou continue to be wrong; "careless" or even "extremely careless" does not equal "gross negligence".
but I was not talking about criminal gross negligence I was simply talking about gross negligence as in being extremely careless.
negligence
failure to take proper care over something.
synonyms: carelessness, lack of care, lack of proper care and attention.
One would hope that Mr Comey does know more about the law than me, he was after all a lawyer. Its a pity he is not as articulate though. 😵
07 Nov 16
Originally posted by whodeyNot a single one of those things has been shown at all.
The only thing he did was draw attention to the Fact that Hillary's #1 aide committed perjury, lied to the FBI, withheld a device on which she used to store 650,000 confidential/classified e-mails - a device and e-mails she shared with her estranged pedophile husband who has no security clearance.
If nothing else, as Comey pointed out, Hillary was careles ...[text shortened]... or judgment that endangered National Security.
The not so United States is a Banana Republic.
07 Nov 16
2 edits
Originally posted by no1marauderyes it does, I have just provided a definition, you merely assumed that I was talking about being grossly negligent in a legal sense when I was not. Grossly negligent is the same as being extremely careless. If its not you will tell us why its not in a purely lexical sense.
You continue to be wrong; "careless" or even "extremely careless" does not equal "gross negligence".
07 Nov 16
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderSo Hillary knowing she should not use her private server and then inquiring whether she could get away with it by discussing it with Colin Powell and then deleting her e-mails with bleach bit and destroying her servers was not willful?
[b]Nor is "carelessness" even "extreme carelessness" equal to "gross negligence". Criminal gross negligence has the requirement that the disregard be "willful"
All righty then! 🙄
07 Nov 16
Originally posted by EladarAnyone else would have been put in prison and/or lost their job.
Only a libtard would believe that Hillary being careless with classified and top secret material isn't grossly negligent.
Everyone knows this. There is no precedent for overlooking this sort of behavior.
07 Nov 16
Originally posted by whodeyNo, she didn't "know it".
So Hillary knowing she should not use her private server and then inquiring whether she could get away with it by discussing it with Colin Powell and then deleting her e-mails with bleach bit and destroying her servers was not willful?
All righty then! 🙄
No, discussing what type of e-mail system she should use with Colin Powell doesn't show "willfulness".
No, deleting personal e-mails by using a freeware doesn't show "willfulness".
This has been explained to you over and over and over again.
07 Nov 16
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobie🙄🙄🙄
yes it does, I have just provided a definition, you merely assumed that I was talking about being grossly negligent in a legal sense when I was not. Grossly negligent is the same as being extremely careless. If its not you will tell us why its not in a purely lexical sense.
From wiki:
Prosser and Keeton describe gross negligence as being "the want of even slight or scant care", and note it as having been described as a lack of care that even a careless person would use.
So gross negligence goes beyond carelessness, even "extreme carelessness".
07 Nov 16
Originally posted by no1marauderShe did not know she was not suppose to use her private server?
No, she didn't "know it".
No, discussing what type of e-mail system she should use with Colin Powell doesn't show "willfulness".
No, deleting personal e-mails by using a freeware doesn't show "willfulness".
This has been explained to you over and over and over again.
I thought everyone with security clearance was splained bout it.
07 Nov 16
2 edits
Originally posted by no1marauderYes of course the mere use of the term gross implies a substantial degree and cannot in any shape or from be considered slight. thats why we are using the term, its extreme or large scale negligence/carelessness on the part of Mrs Clinton.
🙄🙄🙄
From wiki:
Prosser and Keeton describe gross negligence as being "the want of even slight or scant care", and note it as having been described as a lack of care that even a careless person would use.
So gross negligence goes beyond carelessness, even "extreme carelessness".
Gross
General or large-scale
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gross
07 Nov 16
2 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobie🙄🙄🙄
Yes of course the mere use of the term gross implies a substantial degree and cannot in any shape or from be considered slight. thats why we are using the term, its extreme or large scale negligence/carelessness on the part of Mrs Clinton.
Gross
General or large-scale
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gross
Negligence does not equal carelessness.
I'm not going to keep going around in circles here; I have demonstrated that "gross negligence" goes beyond "extreme carelessness".
07 Nov 16
Originally posted by no1marauderDo you expect us all to believe that no one warns people with a security clearance not to use their private server? That's insane.
Well you are wrong. No one told HRC that she couldn't use a private server when she was Secretary of State.
How about Hillary warning others under her not to use their own private server?
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!