Go back
Homosexual adoption

Homosexual adoption

Debates

bbarr
Chief Justice

Center of Contention

Joined
14 Jun 02
Moves
17381
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cribs
Yes. The only way the child would be less likely would be if
he was so disgusted by his parents that he made a concerted
effort to never be like them.
Hmmm. 'More likely' and 'less likely' aren't the only two options. Their sexual orientation may have no effect on the likelihood that an adopted child will be homosexual.

C
Moderately Offensive

All up in yo' face!

Joined
14 Oct 03
Moves
28590
Clock
10 Aug 04
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bbarr
Hmmm. 'More likely' and 'less likely' aren't the only two options. Their sexual orientation may have no effect on the likelihood that an adopted child will be homosexual.
Are you of the belief that homosexuality is innate from birth,
or a learned behavior, or simply a rational choice?

In the first case, I would agree that parents have no influence.
In the second and third, parents are a strong influence on all
aspects of a child's development, so I would assert that they
have some effect.

Dr. Cribs

u
semper fi

Joined
02 Oct 03
Moves
112520
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cribs
Are you of the belief that homosexuality is innate from birth,
or a learned behavior, or simply a rational choice?

In the first case, I would agree that parents have no influence.
In the second and third, parents are a strong influence on all
aspects of a child's development, so I would assert that they
have some effect.

Dr. Cribs

i agrre with the good doctor on this one. if the child picked up on his parent activity early on in life, he might hardly know better. i could see it might be damaging developing strong homosexual tendencies at such an early age. you would not get the ridicule from the parents being gay, it would be the child him/herself.

p

Graceland.

Joined
02 Dec 02
Moves
18130
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bbarr
Well, I'm sure that depends on where the child is raised. I would hope a homosexual couple wouldn't raise their child near Christians, for instance, lest their hatred and bigotry threaten the child (or worse, rub off on child). In much of the Pacific Northewest, however, I'm sure that a homosexual couple could raise a child relatively free of worry (though there are "bad neighborhoods", but these are easily identified by counting crosses on the skyline).

Bad day Bennet ?

Figured 😉

S

Joined
06 Aug 03
Moves
10020
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ghanima Atreides
...but thing is it is very probable that the child will suffer later in his life, when he goes to school and gets ridiculed by the other kids about his "two moms" or "two dads" people have these preconceptions and especially children can be very harsh...
Kids, are harsh, thats certainly true. Ya don't need two mons or dads to be bullied. Being too tall, too short, too hairy, not hairy enough, having a big nose, having a small nose, having no distinguising features at all are all gonna be picked on....it really does not matter, kids don't need the fuel, they'll always find something...

p

Graceland.

Joined
02 Dec 02
Moves
18130
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Simonm
Kids, are harsh, thats certainly true. Ya don't need two mons or dads to be bullied. Being too tall, too short, too hairy, not hairy enough, having a big nose, having a small nose, having no distinguising features at all are all gonna be picked on....it really does not matter, kids don't need the fuel, they'll always find something...

I think its tough enough to grow up without a parent (mother of father). They both play a great individual role in one's upbringing. When you hurt your knee and cry, you want your mother, when you want to play catch, you need your father.

Both are integral to one's upbringing. I've known people who have grown up without one of their parents and the effects are noticeable.

bbarr
Chief Justice

Center of Contention

Joined
14 Jun 02
Moves
17381
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cribs
Are you of the belief that homosexuality is innate from birth,
or a learned behavior, or simply a rational choice?

In the first case, I would agree that parents have no influence.
In the second and third, parents are a strong influence on all
aspects of a child's development, so I would assert that they
have some effect.

Dr. Cribs

There is a genetic component to homosexuality, but that doesn't entail that homosexuality is innate. All it means is that one relevant causal force is innate. Most character traits (e.g., aggressiveness, introspectiveness, etc.) result from the complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. In fact, even referring to genetic components and environmental factors is somewhat arbitrary, as you cannot specify an instance of either without that instance being causally impacted by some instance of the other. I do not think that homosexuality is chosen by the homosexual. No homosexual I have ever met has decided to be attracted to members of the same sex; rather, it occurred to them that they were so attracted at around puberty, and they retrospectively recognized prior behaviors as expressive of this attraction. In fact, homosexuals seem to become aware of their sexuality in a manner isomorphic to that by which heterosexuals become aware of their sexuality.

S

Joined
06 Aug 03
Moves
10020
Clock
10 Aug 04
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pcaspian
Kids, are harsh, thats certainly true. Ya don't need two mons or dads to be bullied. Being too tall, too short, too hairy, not hairy enough, having a big nose, having a small nose, having no distinguising features at all are all gonna be ...[text shortened]... up without one of their parents and the effects are noticeable.
I was really only trying to cover the issue of bullying there...

I would agree that an absent parent can cause great harm but I've not seen any evidence that 2 same-sex parents can't fill all the role models a kid needs.

Just based on what I think (like I said not seen much evidence) I don't think the child's upbringing would be harmed just because the parents are the same sex. Of course that does not preclude the possibility that same sex parents could do a very bad job and end up really messing a kid up, but I know plenty of hetrosexual parents who have messed there kids up too...

p

Graceland.

Joined
02 Dec 02
Moves
18130
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cribs
Are you of the belief that homosexuality is innate from birth,
or a learned behavior, or simply a rational choice?

In the first case, I would agree that parents have no influence.
In the second and third, parents are a strong influence on all
aspects of a child's development, so I would assert that they
have some effect.

Dr. Cribs


Read Origin of the Species Cribs. Apparently the framework is still fundamentally sound, but sometimes I wonder.



C
Moderately Offensive

All up in yo' face!

Joined
14 Oct 03
Moves
28590
Clock
10 Aug 04
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bbarr
In fact, even referring to genetic components and environmental factors is somewhat arbitrary, as you cannot specify an instance of either without that instance being causally impacted by some instance of the other.
It seems that your model of homosexuality precludes
the possibility of usmc's question having any meaning,
because you seem to be stating that one cannot examine
an environmental factor and test or speculate about that
factor's influence on a personality trait.

My repsonse above was taking usmc's model as given.
That is, a home environment can have an influence
on a child's personality traits. And under that model,
I think it is clear that given an environment in which homosexuality
is not only acceptable but the norm, then the child
will be influenced toward rather than away from
homosexuality.

Dr. Cribs

GA
Lady Atreides

Den Haag - Holland

Joined
30 May 04
Moves
4408
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Simonm
Kids, are harsh, thats certainly true. Ya don't need two mons or dads to be bullied. Being too tall, too short, too hairy, not hairy enough, having a big nose, having a small nose, having no distinguising features at all are all gonna be picked on....it really does not matter, kids don't need the fuel, they'll always find something...
Agreed. So that brings me to my first conclusion, that a child raised by a homosexual couple would have a hard time...but also he or she would eventually learn to overcome it, like any of life's hardships.

C
Moderately Offensive

All up in yo' face!

Joined
14 Oct 03
Moves
28590
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pcaspian

Read Origin of the Species Cribs. Apparently the framework is still fundamentally sound, but sometimes I wonder.
I tried one time. It was way too dry for me, and above
my head due to my severe lack of knowledge of biology.

Did you read and understand it?

Dr. Cribs

p

Graceland.

Joined
02 Dec 02
Moves
18130
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Simonm
I was really only trying to cover the issue of bullying there...

I would agree that an absent parent can cause great harm but I've not seen any evidence that 2 same-sex parents can't fill all the role models a kid needs.


Well yes, clearly having 2 gay parents would greatly increase bullying. I certainly do not envy a child who would go to my school having 2 gay parents, but the effects of bullying is not really a good reason to prevent someone from adopting a child. I think the benefits of good parenting substantially outweigh the effects of bullying. Whils't not underestimating the effects bullying can have on a person, I do feel a greater amount of personal growth is lost from the absense of one parent, than from bullying.

Provided the parents raise the child in an sexually neutral environment, I would even go as far as to say that gay parenting would have a greater benefit than single parenting.



p

Graceland.

Joined
02 Dec 02
Moves
18130
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cribs
I tried one time. It was way too dry for me, and above
my head due to my severe lack of knowledge of biology.

Did you read and understand it?

Dr. Cribs


I cant recall having to use alot of biology to understand it, but then I did read it a very long time ago.

I tend to read quite a few articles regarding evolutionary theory however. Last year that was a theory on homosexuality and Darwinism published in the New Scientist, but don't think it was too well received.

I'm sure there is an idiots guide to evolution somewhere. Always the best place to start.

cheers

bbarr
Chief Justice

Center of Contention

Joined
14 Jun 02
Moves
17381
Clock
10 Aug 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cribs
It seems that your model of homosexuality precludes
the possibility of usmc's question having any meaning,
because you seem to be stating that one cannot examine
an environmental factor and test or speculate about that
factor's influence on a personality trait.

My repsonse above was taking usmc's model as given.
That is, a home environment can have ...[text shortened]... m, then the child
will be influenced toward rather than away from
homosexuality.

Dr. Cribs
This depends on any number of other factors. For instance, is sexual orientation established in utero? Is sexual orientation established in part by physiological factors that are independent of a parent's sexual orientation? Is sexual orientation established in part by psychological characteristics of the parents that have nothing to do with sexuality? Is there any evidence whatever that allows us to take a position on any of these questions? If not, then the most we can say, in our ignorance, is that it is possible that the sexual orientation of adopters may influence the sexual orientation of adopted children. But so what? We already knew it was possible.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.