@divegeester saidIf you want me to answer you, maybe you should learn to spell my name.
Suzanne?
@divegeester saidSo what is your point with this? I don't appreciate you feeling like you have to get in my face with a stupid question.
Surely your personal relationship with the Prince of Peace already tells you all you need to know about how Jesus would deal with a LGBT person?
Don't be lazy. Read the freaking OP.
@mott-the-hoople saidDo you think everything was created in six days 6000 years ago?
“The Bible knows no other gender categories besides male and female. While men and women in Scripture may express their masculinity and femininity in a wonderful diversity of ways, Scripture still operates with the binary categories of men and women. You are one or the other. The anomaly of intersex individuals does not undermine the creational design, but rather give ...[text shortened]... ated, likely for a royal court (for more on the challenge of intersex, and the question of eunuchs.”
@mott-the-hoople saidAnd you can't even comfort them or give them what they need. All you can do is treat them as less than human. You should be ashamed.
glad you finally admit it is an affliction
comfort does not equal approve or agree
@suzianne saidWhy did they not need ‘help’in previous generations?
Hey, genius, no one is shoveling this to kids. Just as there are kids born homosexual, there are kids born with gender dysphoria. Getting these kids the help they need before they kill themselves because they think no one cares is the main objective. Some kids have these issues ALREADY. The main idea is getting them help before it's too late.
Remember, Mott, I and others have to wade thru a lot of your misguided comments to get to the meat of your posts.
For example, do you have any idea how many hours were wasted writing about books being banned, when there has never been one book banned in this entire country.?
@averagejoe1 saidSuzianne, why did they not need 'help' in previous generations?
Why did they not need ‘help’in previous generations?
Remember, Mott, I and others have to wade thru a lot of your misguided comments to get to the meat of your posts.
For example, do you have any idea how many hours were wasted writing about books being banned, when there has never been one book banned in this entire country.?
@suzianne saidI'm telling you whoever programs it sets up the parameters period end of the story AI takes what it gets and weighs all of the data according to how it is told to. Having AI predict anything requires proper parameters and knowing how the living Word of God would respond using AI, no. God's ways are not ours, I'm not the one giving Jesus the short shrift here, giving Him a robotic voice to produce a predictable preferable outcome sounds like a preacher who never uses the Word of God yet gives sermons on what He thinks God wants or likes no matter what is in scripture.
I'm pretty sure that asking it what would KellyJay say would NOT give the same answer.
You're giving Jesus some seriously short shrift here, man.
@averagejoe1 saidMedical science advances Joe, do you think all those previous generations suffering from a cleft palate didn’t need help until someone developed a procedure that could largely rectify the issue.
Why did they not need ‘help’in previous generations?
Remember, Mott, I and others have to wade thru a lot of your misguided comments to get to the meat of your posts.
For example, do you have any idea how many hours were wasted writing about books being banned, when there has never been one book banned in this entire country.?
@averagejoe1 saidThey did. They suffered in silence, thinking it was only them, or that they were somehow flawed. Many killed themselves.
Suzianne, why did they not need 'help' in previous generations?
And here you are, sweeping all that under the rug.
@kellyjay saidIt has the entire Bible to reference.
I'm telling you whoever programs it sets up the parameters period end of the story AI takes what it gets and weighs all of the data according to how it is told to. Having AI predict anything requires proper parameters and knowing how the living Word of God would respond using AI, no. God's ways are not ours, I'm not the one giving Jesus the short shrift here, giving Him a ...[text shortened]... e Word of God yet gives sermons on what He thinks God wants or likes no matter what is in scripture.
You're assuming.
@averagejoe1 saidStop lying. Communities, mostly conservative, ban books all the time.
For example, do you have any idea how many hours were wasted writing about books being banned, when there has never been one book banned in this entire country.?
Mostly about LGBTQ or other stuff they wrongly think they're protecting kids from.
@Mott-The-Hoople
So many simply over look the very big & bright obvious. You most likely see Jesus all the time along with the rest of the world.
Just think about it. Jesus is the "light" of the world.
What is the brightest light you have ever seen?😀o we "follow" this gigantically, beautiful orb?
Of course we do.
Everyone knows & remembers that our gigantically, all-seeing, all-knowing, truly magnificently, generous closest Star that is clearly the brightest, (implying intelligence), is always on a never ending journey upwards & spiralling.
It gives us life, light, power, as it cuts threw darkness like a hot knife threw butter.
Our Son shines truth onto any & all lies exposing them.
Our Son is The Holy Spirit, Jesus, God.
More than worth of acknowledging.
Peace be with you.
S.L.K.
@star-luck-key saidUhuh. But no. That’s the Sun you are referring to; a large ball of gas.
@Mott-The-Hoople
So many simply over look the very big & bright obvious. You most likely see Jesus all the time along with the rest of the world.
Just think about it. Jesus is the "light" of the world.
What is the brightest light you have ever seen?😀o we "follow" this gigantically, beautiful orb?
Of course we do.
Everyone knows & remembers that our giganti ...[text shortened]... is The Holy Spirit, Jesus, God.
More than worth of acknowledging.
Peace be with you.
S.L.K.
There ain’t no gods, sunshine.
@wildgrass saidYou are 100% right about preexisting bias. I read it to mean, 1/- a MAN born without testis, 2/- a MAN that had his testis removed ( forcibly? ) that he might be suitable for purpose and 3/- one that chose so that HE might not be led into temptation. The last one would be the opposite of the modern highly sexualized Tranny. But your preexisting bias makes it hard for you to see this.
Many passages in the bible are open to interpretation based on your preexisting bias. But It's really difficult to read the aforementioned bible passage and conclude anything other than that Matthew was affirming both birthright transgender and choice-based transgender individuals, and asking for acceptance.
@jimmac saidMeanwhile, with your pre-existing bias, that's all you see. Just like Mott.
You are 100% right about preexisting bias. I read it to mean, 1/- a MAN born without testis, 2/- a MAN that had his testis removed ( forcibly? ) that he might be suitable for purpose and 3/- one that chose so that HE might not be led into temptation. The last one would be the opposite of the modern highly sexualized Tranny. But your preexisting bias makes it hard for you to see this.