28 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidIt confirms what everyone but you is saying. We know you are a Bot , so we are not upset with your cat and mouse game. More fun than reading treatises. Did you see where Phranny just upchucked one almost as bad as Sonhouse? More obviously boring plagiarized link, aka Biden.
How?
28 Jul 23
@averagejoe1 saidNo it really doesn't. It says the prosecution, in open court, stated there was no immunity deal.
It confirms what everyone but you is saying. We know you are a Bot , so we are not upset with your cat and mouse game. More fun than reading treatises. Did you see where Phranny just upchucked one almost as bad as Sonhouse? More obviously boring plagiarized link, aka Biden.
What is it about right wingers that once they are fed propaganda makes them completely unwilling to accept contrary facts?
28 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidWe seem to be crossing sentences, but dammit, it is worse than that. You and I know EXACTLY what the blanket immunity issue is about, that there will be none, that the lawyers screwed up, that the judge did a great job. So, like I said, you have fun, just messing around, and taking up forum space.
Blanket immunity certainly exists.
It just was never agreed to here by the prosecution.
Is this sort of another way that you are parsing words and sentences and phrases and ideas and thoughts and comments and serious conversation by other people?
28 Jul 23
@no1marauder
To every one else….. No matter which side you are on, do you not find it unbelievable, that these Biden lawyers try to pull a fast one on a judge, and yet will not be punished for it? Something to think about in this liberal world that has descended upon us.
28 Jul 23
@averagejoe1 saidThis is ridiculous, I'm not going to waste further time with this idiot.
@no1marauder
To every one else….. No matter which side you are on, do you not find it unbelievable, that these Biden lawyers try to pull a fast one on a judge, and yet will not be punished for it? Something to think about in this liberal world that has descended upon us.
The articles speak for themselves; none support Earl's Daily Mail analysis that there was some shady deal between the prosecutors and the defense foiled by the alert Judge. The prosecutors were asked whether there was an immunity deal, they said no and the defense counsel therefore withdrew the plea albeit temporarily. There's nothing nefarious about it and I'd say there's a 99% chance the deal is renegotiated and this time explicitly specifies that there is no immunity for other crimes beyond the indictment.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147485
28 Jul 23
@no1marauder saidyou look like a fool trying to shyweasel for these mafia folks
This is ridiculous, I'm not going to waste further time with this idiot.
The articles speak for themselves; none support Earl's Daily Mail analysis that there was some shady deal between the prosecutors and the defense foiled by the alert Judge. The prosecutors were asked whether there was an immunity deal, they said no and the defense counsel therefore withdrew the p ...[text shortened]... and this time explicitly specifies that there is no immunity for other crimes beyond the indictment.
29 Jul 23
@mott-the-hoople saidHe totally ignores that the defense lawyers tried to slip this 'nefarious' idea past the judge. Marauder has no problem with that. I can see he uses Nexis Lexis and may be a paraglegal all excited about this stuff. A lawyer might not be so defensive of this nasty business, as it might be referred to in the UK.
you look like a fool trying to shyweasel for these mafia folks
It is a crime family. The $ has been increased to $50M as the research keeps producing more info. How bout Joe's slick move, after 4 years, of recognizing his granddaughter...it will take our mind off of his crimes.
Makes me think, What is worse: Keeping illegal Mexican children away from their adults, or, talking about your 6 children...when you have SEVEN!?!??!?