Go back
Hunter:Season 5, Ep.1 $4.8M from Chinese Deal!!

Hunter:Season 5, Ep.1 $4.8M from Chinese Deal!!

Debates

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54603
Clock
01 Apr 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mchill said
IF you write back that I am lying


Joe - It doesn't matter if I think you're lying. It only matters if judges and juries think you're lying, and so far, neither your record or a certain ex President's record is looking very good in that area - are they? 😏
Settle, McHill. Judges and Juries are not participating in the Forum, so all of us do not get your saying that. Everyone here is de facto a jury member for purposes of RHP.
Now let's have fun. Did you see where your comrade Suzianne said WAPO is a right-wing rag, when in fact is top-tier liberal?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54603
Clock
01 Apr 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
Thank you. The very fact that Joe is not under investigation means his name was not brought up.
You say 'Was not brought up'. More to the point would be his name 'has not yet been brought up'. The bringing up of Joe's name has not happened, because there is still info being uncovered, which will no doubt become evidence. When that information becomes known, we will all be writing posts including the name Joe Biden at that time.
But maybe Hunter is innocent of any wrong-doing, so, there will be nothing for which to bring up Joe's name. Yeah, that could happen.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
01 Apr 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
More to the point would be his name 'has not yet been brought up'. The bringing up of Joe's name has not happened, because there is still info being uncovered, which will no doubt become evidence.
Here's where you're wrong: this information isn't new. It's just being made public because the FBI doesn't like to announce investigations that could influence elections...contrary to what Comey did.

The FBI has been investigating Hunter this whole time and still have not found any reason to include Joe. So while this information may appear "new" it's not.

But you're correct; just because Joe's name hasn't been brought up doesn't mean it won't. There's definitely enough to constitute conflicts of interest. We'll see if that leads up to any criminal on Joe's part.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
01 Apr 22
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Came out yesterday, from a partisan newspaper. IF you write back that I am lying (zzzz), note that I only post a news report, it is not me saying anything.
Seems this would be something of interest to the Forum. More than Hillary punishment of the day.

https://bulldogreports.com/2022/03/31/wapo-admits-hunter-profited-4-8m-from-chinese-energy-deal/
Here's you on another thread...
You and I are not in the room, but for some reason the council wants the rich guy in there. He will say what is in it for me. (you prob subconciously used that phrase today). Greed, right. So, they hammer out something that works for everyone,

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.