13 Aug 06
Originally posted by NordlysNo less than advertising or continual use of the word "evil" when referring to other nations.
You can have a consistent message without repeating the same phrases over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. Empty phrases won't convince people, they will just annoy them, so it's counterproductive.
13 Aug 06
2 edits
Originally posted by Sambo69So that we dont get to misunderinterpret your stance Mr Chips; because the media tends to report and promote certain of George's soundbites, that gives you licence to use a similarly restricted style of non debate on this forum? So in effect what you are saying is that your intended audience that you wish to address in these forums are actually George Bush and the western media?
No less than advertising or continual use of the word "evil" when referring to other nations.
Anyone that may innocently stumble into the pathway of your internal logic and gets "blown up" by the insignificance of their arguments are in essence then some sort of collateral damage?
Do the terms drug induced psychosis or affective disorder mean anything to you!
13 Aug 06
Originally posted by NordlysI agree with this. For example:
You can have a consistent message without repeating the same phrases over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. Empty phrases won't convince people, they will just annoy them, so it's counterproductive.
violence leads to violence
violence follows violence
violence comes after violence
violence is the product of violence
fighting leads to fighting
aggression leads to aggression
if you show violence to someone, they will show it back
See? Now it isn't spamming?
13 Aug 06
Originally posted by shavixmirAs far as the indefinite banning goes, I try to be on your side too, Stangbo, but you just insist on making it very difficult to initiate any kind of reasonable defense.
Oh.. boring? tedious? etc. etc.
God knows...I'm on your side man!
13 Aug 06
Originally posted by kmax87Again, you are incorrect. For example, see this thread which was also closed by BelgianFreak:
Because you have yet to debate a single issue.
Other than parading a smug self righteous air and posing an endless barrage of rhetorical questions where you employ every generalisation know to man I have yet to hear you propose anything that constitutes a) an original idea
b) an argu ...[text shortened]... endlessly in polemic and diatribe. If I wanted a one way street I could turn on the television.
"Paying politicians for peace" - www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=47783
13 Aug 06
1 edit
Originally posted by shavixmirSarcasm acknowledged 🙂
Don't people dance the Sambo?
I heard it's quite popular in war-torn regions. You just rub up against each other and cause some sexual friction...
I must to add FYI (I'm not being personal, I know that you know perfectly what I'm going to say 🙂 )
Spelled zambo or sambo: is a colloquial/humorous appellation for a negro (black person); sometimes (most frequent at least here at Argentina and Uruguay, but a very rarely term used), to designate the offspring of a black person and a mulatto.
Samba is a typical rythm from Brazil. No sexual frictions in it 🙂
But Lambada (another south america dance) which origins are disputed by Bolivia and Brazil, has a high sexual content.
Cheers!
- J
P.S.: off topic, I know, but I couln't resist 🙂
13 Aug 06
Originally posted by Sambo69That's no reason to treat people like stupid unthinking advertising fodder. And even advertisers freshen up their approach from time to time.
People keep getting killed.
Treating people with contempt leads to treating people with contempt, no?
13 Aug 06
Originally posted by dottewellGood point, dottewell.
That's no reason to treat people like stupid unthinking advertising fodder. And even advertisers freshen up their approach from time to time.
Treating people with contempt leads to treating people with contempt, no?