Go back
Imperial system fun

Imperial system fun

Debates

T

Joined
13 Mar 07
Moves
48752
Clock
13 Jul 17

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
I have to skip american recipes when i cook because how much is a cup? Flour is measured in cups, but butter is measured in sticks. Vanilla essence might be measured in teaspoons or table spoons.
A cup is legally defined in the US as 240ml - very precise and no need to worry about how to define it. Australia, Canada and New Zealand define it as 250ml which of course makes it a round fraction of a litre (the difference between these and the American volume being negligible).

British recipes too uses teaspoons and tablespoons, and shops sell measures containing a standard teaspoon and tablespoon quantity (and half or quarter measures); although using a real teaspoon or tablespoon in their place is rarely problematic.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
13 Jul 17

Originally posted by Teinosuke
A cup is legally defined in the US as 240ml - very precise and no need to worry about how to define it. Australia, Canada and New Zealand define it as 250ml which of course makes it a round fraction of a litre (the difference between these and the American volume being negligible).

British recipes too uses teaspoons and tablespoons, and shops sell measu ...[text shortened]... er measures); although using a real teaspoon or tablespoon in their place is rarely problematic.
yep, very precise (using mililitres)
and if i want 2.7 cups? that's what calculators are for
and if someone wants to make several helpings of that recipe and they need to buy flour? well they need to look up how many cups to a pound and do the math
and if someone uses a random cup they have in the house? tough luck they should have known cup doesn't mean any cup
and if someone mistakes tbls with tsp ? tough luck, they just OD on medicine

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
13 Jul 17

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Using a calculator to convert imperial to metric is one of the dumbest things I've heard.
Then do it in your head, like most people age 12 and up.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
13 Jul 17

Originally posted by sh76
Then do it in your head, like most people age 12 and up.
oh, you can do for example 1.7 miles to meters conversion in your head? wow, you are so awesome.


or you're a liar. i wonder which is more likely

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
14 Jul 17
1 edit

Originally posted by sh76
Then do it in your head, like most people age 12 and up.
I grew up with the metric system, spent 5 years in the US in an industry where measurements were taken and made all day everyday, I stuck with metric, converting where necessary it wasn't a problem.

...and it wasn't always necessary because there is a gradual move that way anyway. Guess zahlanzi is dreaming about a goobermint edict with fines and people being taken to court.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
14 Jul 17

Originally posted by sh76
Then do it in your head, like most people age 12 and up.
You obviously do not cook.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
14 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Using a calculator to convert imperial to metric is one of the dumbest things I've heard.
When I build things for my job or at home I ALWAYS use metric. 124 mmX 145 mm. Pretty exact. 4.88 and then some X 5.708 and then some inches. Stupid.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
14 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
You obviously do not cook.
I suppose sticking a TV dinner in the microwave doesn't count?

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
14 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
oh, you can do for example 1.7 miles to meters conversion in your head? wow, you are so awesome.


or you're a liar. i wonder which is more likely
Of course I can. I know that a mile is a little more than 1.6 KM and a KM is a little more than .62 miles. That's a good enough estimate for any real life purposes in measuring distances.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
16 Jul 17
1 edit

Originally posted by sh76
Of course I can. I know that a mile is a little more than 1.6 KM and a KM is a little more than .62 miles. That's a good enough estimate for any real life purposes in measuring distances.
"Of course I can. I know that a mile is a little more than 1.6 KM and a KM is a little more than .62 miles. That's a good enough estimate for any real life purposes in measuring distances"

aaa, why didn't you say so. you only plan to move one mile at a time.
and what's a couple hundred meters more or less, i am sure people building a big ass bridge don't need the exact measurements, they have cement to spare.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
16 Jul 17

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
"Of course I can. I know that a mile is a little more than 1.6 KM and a KM is a little more than .62 miles. That's a good enough estimate for any real life purposes in measuring distances"

aaa, why didn't you say so. you only plan to move one mile at a time.
As opposed to you who moves one millimeter at a time 🙄

k

Joined
15 Dec 03
Moves
313682
Clock
16 Jul 17
1 edit

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d3gAZ-Te3Y
This is a lecture poking fun at the masochistic usage of the incredibly stupid imperial system.

If you ask a european how many millimeters are in 2 metres, he will imediately answer you. 2 thousands.
How many grams are in 2 kilograms? 2 thousand
How many milliliters are in 2 litres? 2 thousand

Now, how ...[text shortened]... ecause a doctor says 3.5 ml and the pharmacist labels 3.5 teaspoons or table spoons or whatever.
If I jump out of a Casa or a Grand Caravan from 13.5 k doing a 120 knots into a 50 mph headwind w/a lb. of gold, a kilo of cocaine, a lb. of feathers and my ex wife who is 20 stones and my canopy has a 1.5 wing loading who/what hits the ground first at a 3 thousand ft. elevation? Remember. I'm going out the back of the Casa w/the relative wind and the Caravan into the relative wind.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
16 Jul 17
1 edit

BTW, when machining metal in the Imperial system the common units are inches and thou, i.e. thousandths of an inch. 1.500" 3.375" etc.

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107159
Clock
16 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kquinn909
If I jump out of a Casa or a Grand Caravan from 13.5 k doing a 120 knots into a 50 mph headwind w/a lb. of gold, a kilo of cocaine, a lb. of feathers and my ex wife who is 20 stones and my canopy has a 1.5 wing loading who/what hits the ground first at a 3 thousand ft. elevation? Remember. I'm going out the back of the Casa w/the relative wind and the Caravan into the relative wind.
Comparing apples you have
1lb of gold
2.2 lbs of cocaine
1 lb of feathers
280 lbs of ex wife.

Terminal velocity tends to increase with weight, but decrease with drag, so given that your lb of gold would create a sphere of volume 1.44 cu inch or sphere of radius 0.77 of an inch, it would have negligible drag.

Because an object falling has a vertical component of velocity that is independent to any horizontal velocity it possesses, you can ignore it own initial velocity or the effect of the headwind on the terminal velocity an object can potentially develop. The object with least drag should be least affected therefore, and should reach the highest terminal velocity which makes the gold, the prime contender to reach 3,000 ft ground elevation first.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
17 Jul 17



what a fantastical, logical and consistent system of units

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.