10 Apr 23
@metal-brain saidIf a politician isn’t politically motivated he’s…
Okay, let's define "politically motivated" and the implications since you want me to think it is such a benign normalcy.
When Bush V Gore was decided by the supreme court it was a 5 to 4 decision.
Was that decision politically motivated?
10 Apr 23
@shavixmir said"If the prosecution is moving forward with charges, they obviously think they’ve got a good case."
Agreed.
And what’s more, if the court case(s) make trump more or less popular is neither here nor there.
You can’t let justice be a popularity contest.
If the prosecution is moving forward with charges, they obviously think they’ve got a good case.
Not if it is politically motivated. Didn't you create a whole thread about how Clarence Thomas did worse and got away with it? You said he should be indicted and removed from the supreme court. I agree with that, but there he sits on the court in this 2 tiered system of justice.
10 Apr 23
@shavixmir saidJudges are not politicians, but they can be politically motivated.
If a politician isn’t politically motivated he’s…
Bush v Gore was a completely fair decision then, right? Not counting every vote was completely reasonable and democrats just had to cry for a while to mourn over their loss. Right? 😛
10 Apr 23
@metal-brain saidI would presume there’s a difference between jurisprudence and holding a trial.
"If the prosecution is moving forward with charges, they obviously think they’ve got a good case."
Not if it is politically motivated. Didn't you create a whole thread about how Clarence Thomas did worse and got away with it? You said he should be indicted and removed from the supreme court. I agree with that, but there he sits on the court in this 2 tiered system of justice.
And there are juries, judges, etc.
Or are you suggesting the US doesn’t have checks and balances in place, to stop politically motivated trials?
Just listen to trump. The man is a con artist. He constantly lies. He admits to grabbing pussy. He dry humps the flag on stage.
I don’t think a prosecution needs to be politically motivated to go after him. Socially motivated, rightiously motivated, sanely motivated… all possible.
Or, maybe, just maybe, trump broke the law and they have evidence of this.
@metal-brain saidNot the same thing. With the DA you're merely accusing him of bias with no evidence. Thomas accepting lavish gifts from one of the largest Republican donors is clear evidence of corruption.
"If the prosecution is moving forward with charges, they obviously think they’ve got a good case."
Not if it is politically motivated. Didn't you create a whole thread about how Clarence Thomas did worse and got away with it? You said he should be indicted and removed from the supreme court. I agree with that, but there he sits on the court in this 2 tiered system of justice.
Unlike a SCOTUS judge, DAs needs to present solid legal evidence to the courts; Justices merely need to give their opinions. No matter how biased DAs are they still need sound objective reasons for their cases.
10 Apr 23
@shavixmir said"are you suggesting the US doesn’t have checks and balances in place, to stop politically motivated trials?"
I would presume there’s a difference between jurisprudence and holding a trial.
And there are juries, judges, etc.
Or are you suggesting the US doesn’t have checks and balances in place, to stop politically motivated trials?
Just listen to trump. The man is a con artist. He constantly lies. He admits to grabbing pussy. He dry humps the flag on stage.
I don’t think ...[text shortened]... tivated… all possible.
Or, maybe, just maybe, trump broke the law and they have evidence of this.
Yes. Did checks and balances keep Epstein from getting a light sentence before the bigger scandal was exposed later?
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-pedophile-hedge-fund-mogul-jeffrey-epstein-got-off-so-easy-2011-3?IR=T&r=US
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_trial
Did checks and balances keep Epstein and Jean-Luc Brunel from getting suicided while there were coincidental camera malfunctions? How do you think the mafia kills people in prison? We all know it happens. It is just the dirty secret we don't want to think about. We fool ourselves into thinking that our greedy billionaires are not like the mafia.
Did you see that video clip of Bill Gates being asked about Epstein and said "well, he is dead so.."? Maybe Bill Gates had him killed. Epstein probably had Gates on film doing an under aged girl.
https://rumble.com/v2d1l1e-video-proves-joe-rogan-was-right-about-bill-gates.html
10 Apr 23
@metal-brain saidOr maybe Bill Gates didn’t get Epstein killed?
"are you suggesting the US doesn’t have checks and balances in place, to stop politically motivated trials?"
Yes. Did checks and balances keep Epstein from getting a light sentence before the bigger scandal was exposed later?
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-pedophile-hedge-fund-mogul-jeffrey-epstein-got-off-so-easy-2011-3?IR=T&r=US
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi ...[text shortened]... der aged girl.
https://rumble.com/v2d1l1e-video-proves-joe-rogan-was-right-about-bill-gates.html
Jesus man. You’re nuts.
10 Apr 23
@Suzianne
Those who supported him regardless what the evidence was will continue to do so regardless what evidence yet comes. Those who knew he was a conman from from the git go don’t need any more evidence. So we’re all just waiting for the wheels of justice to grind slowly on to some conclusion. It’s an agonizing process, and the fact that Trump himself does not see how this process itself is draining the nation’s resources at a critical juncture in history is testament to his lack of any comprehension of anything beyond his own aggrandizement.
10 Apr 23
@shavixmir saidMaybe he didn't. It could have been Prince Andrew or Biden.
Or maybe Bill Gates didn’t get Epstein killed?
Jesus man. You’re nuts.
10 Apr 23
@shavixmir said" The man is a con artist. He constantly lies. He admits to grabbing pussy. He dry humps the flag on stage"
I would presume there’s a difference between jurisprudence and holding a trial.
And there are juries, judges, etc.
Or are you suggesting the US doesn’t have checks and balances in place, to stop politically motivated trials?
Just listen to trump. The man is a con artist. He constantly lies. He admits to grabbing pussy. He dry humps the flag on stage.
I don’t think ...[text shortened]... tivated… all possible.
Or, maybe, just maybe, trump broke the law and they have evidence of this.
A politician that is a con artist who lies. Am I supposed to be surprised at that?
At least he is honest about grabbing pussy. Biden will not admit to grabbing Tara Reade's pussy.
What is this about dry humping the flag on stage? That is a new one for me. Did he sniff a little girl's hair and kiss her like Biden does? You are obviously putting a priority on vengeance instead of justice because you hate republicans.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@metal-brain saidDon't be silly, it was a far right sleeper agent from China: it must have been Soros! With his very own hands, as well. (Rolls eyes, champs jaws.)
Maybe he didn't. It could have been Prince Andrew or Biden.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
10 Apr 23
@shavixmir saidpretty good case here of lib dems imprisoning conservatives ehh?
Agreed.
And what’s more, if the court case(s) make trump more or less popular is neither here nor there.
You can’t let justice be a popularity contest.
If the prosecution is moving forward with charges, they obviously think they’ve got a good case.
@metal-brain saidThis is correct, shav should have noticed that he was hugging the flag, Shav is spreading propaganda. Luckily, we know that he does that and just have a good laugh.
" The man is a con artist. He constantly lies. He admits to grabbing pussy. He dry humps the flag on stage"
A politician that is a con artist who lies. Am I supposed to be surprised at that?
At least he is honest about grabbing pussy. Biden will not admit to grabbing Tara Reade's pussy.
What is this about dry humping the flag on stage? That is a new one for me. Di ...[text shortened]... ? You are obviously putting a priority on vengeance instead of justice because you hate republicans.
10 Apr 23
@mott-the-hoople saidThat's a case of conservatives committing crimes. Do you think criminals shouldn't be imprisoned if they're conservative?
pretty good case here of lib dems imprisoning conservatives ehh?