03 Aug 19
@suzianne saidLOL! Still denying facts I see.
Election interference by the DNC. Right.
Good one. Typical Republican thinking.
Calling everything by its opposite.
Is that pedophile ring still in the back room at Comet Pizza?
https://activatenow.us/outrage-follows-wasserman-schultz-election-integrity-appearance/
Then they had her scream Russia interference so that would show up in the first page of your search engine instead of her election interference that someone exposed in a DNC inside job, not a hack.
03 Aug 19
@kazetnagorra saidSays your propaganda....idiot!
Metal Brain is an avid consumer of Kremlin propaganda, and it shows.
@suzianne saidThat is only true of you. You deny obvious facts you don't like. How many times have I proved you wrong? Your ego will heal eventually. Stop crying sweety.
You're easily either the most stupid or the most gullible person on this site, and very possibly both.
You keep doing you, though. I'm sure your idiotic threads must entertain someone, somewhere.
The post that was quoted here has been removedDoes Duchess think the US had no choice but to enter WW1 and help the empire it fought with such zeal and disgust for imperialism? How was that in the USA's interest?
Will Duchess explain why the British helped us invade and control oil rich countries to keep the US dollar the world reserve currency instead of competing with the British currency?
Will Duchess explain why the Five Eyes Nations (all colonies of the British Empire at some point) seem to share the same interests without resorting to some stupid assumption of "good guy" nations bull crap?
https://www.businessinsider.com/encrypted-messaging-under-pressure-from-five-eyes-nations-2019-7
03 Aug 19
The post that was quoted here has been removedHow was that in the USA's interest? Rejecting my theory and offering nothing yourself is not in the least bit impressive. You can't do better than that?
I noticed you avoided all of my questions and have resorted to primitive nay saying. Is that going to continue? Is an ad hominem attack coming out of frustration? That seems to be your MO when you have no explanation.
03 Aug 19
The post that was quoted here has been removedOh, I don’t know about that, it is beginning to dawn on me that there is no belief so far-fetched that it isn’t believed by someone, somewhere, maybe even by someone on this forum. But maybe this is just a crazy belief of mine. Cheers to all, except maybe that one over there.
03 Aug 19
@metal-brain said“The issue's not whether you're paranoid, Lenny, I mean look at this s**t, the issue is whether you're paranoid enough.” - Max Peltier, Strange Days (Movie)
@JS357
"Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity."
Marshall McLuhan
https://effectiviology.com/argument-from-incredulity/
@metal-brain said"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet." - George Washington
@JS357
"Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity."
Marshall McLuhan
https://effectiviology.com/argument-from-incredulity/
@metal-brain saidLyme disease was known in the 18th century. In Scotland.
The book is “Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons” by Stanford University-based science writer Kris Newby. A chronic Lyme sufferer herself, Newby documents how the U.S. military infected ticks with complex, hard-to-detect pathogens in the 1960s. The book’s linchpin is an interview with late scientist Willy Burgdorfer, who did the infecting and ...[text shortened]... d never heard of it until the ticks suddenly appeared in MI. I didn't think about it much until now.
Hardly likely it’s a bloody bio weapon.
@kazetnagorra saidI thought it was an Abe Lincoln quote. Isn't that how it started?
"Don't believe everything you read on the Internet." - George Washington
@shavixmir saidIf you assume they always get the results they want. Then again, they might just be testing how much ticks can spread a disease. Perhaps shift to a more lethal disease. Can you rule those out?
Lyme disease was known in the 18th century. In Scotland.
Hardly likely it’s a bloody bio weapon.
I'm not saying a think it is likely, but dismissing something outright doesn't seem right since congress voted for an investigation.
If I'm silly for posting this thread what about congress? Are they raving mad for not thinking like you?