29 Oct 08
Originally posted by PinkFloydwell, I think we all have to admit that it would be quite hard to have talks with the al-qaeda guys.
No, just the "certain violent sects" mentioned in the preceding post.
We mustn't treat the terrorists in the way Neville Chamberlain treated Hitler in the 1930s.
29 Oct 08
Originally posted by generalissimoThe majority of 10 year olds are not as ignorant as you.
we don't have to use name-calling,
we're sensible people here, not 10 year-olds.
And the ones that are as stupid as you, have one massive advantage: they have the capacity to learn.
I am not name-calling here, or being nasty. I am just stating a cold, hard truth.
29 Oct 08
Originally posted by PinkFloydYou 2 are dolts. No one is saying that we should play nicely with terrorists or appease them in any way. I said that not all Muslims were violent as claimed by generalisimo. However, I do think that in order to deal with one group you need to see things from there point of view. In the words of Rage Against the Machine; Know Your Enemy.
Precisely.
29 Oct 08
Originally posted by CliffLandinIt's kinda hard for Yanks to understand their enemy.
You 2 are dolts. No one is saying that we should play nicely with terrorists or appease them in any way. I said that not all Muslims were violent as claimed by generalisimo. However, I do think that in order to deal with one group you need to see things from there point of view. In the words of Rage Against the Machine; Know Your Enemy.
They have been bullying the rest of the world for so long now, that they have never needed to listen to anyone else's opinion.
As for the islamics; they have been so thoroughly brain washed, that they are incapable of bending their minds to reason.
Education is the only solution, and Christ knows, both sides need it!
29 Oct 08
Originally posted by generalissimoI don't know of anyone that is advocating talking with the Al Qaeda types. We need to be in dialogue with the moderate muslims in order to encourage them to put more pressure and action toward eliminating / reducing the extremists in their midsts.
well, I think we all have to admit that it would be quite hard to have talks with the al-qaeda guys.
We mustn't treat the terrorists in the way Neville Chamberlain treated Hitler in the 1930s.
31 Oct 08
Originally posted by CliffLandinI think it's more important to Kill your Enemy than "know" them.
You 2 are dolts. No one is saying that we should play nicely with terrorists or appease them in any way. I said that not all Muslims were violent as claimed by generalisimo. However, I do think that in order to deal with one group you need to see things from there point of view. In the words of Rage Against the Machine; Know Your Enemy.
And if you resort to calling people "dolts", you really should make sure you spell the word "their" correctly when using the possessive in sentences. It makes you look like a, well...you know....😀
31 Oct 08
Originally posted by generalissimoDude... this is your first sentence in this thread:
Its not that.
I just don't get how calling people names is going to contribute to a serious debate.
"are you as dumb as you sound?"
And, so, hence, it's rather automatic that people are going to call you a moronic waste of oxygen. Isn't it?
31 Oct 08
Originally posted by generalissimoDid you know that in the uk, the name mc cain is connected in most people's minds to it's heavily advertised brand of oven chips or "french fries" 😛
Well, he started it, with that immature ''Mcbrain''.
Why do these people insist on these stupid names:
''McBush'', McSame'' etc.
I haven't seem ONE republican or conservative, calling Barack Obama, things like ''barack osama'' or anything like that.
So why do the liberals (or the other morons) here insist on calling mccain names?
