Go back
Israeli peace offer

Israeli peace offer

Debates

Seitse
Doug Stanhope

That's Why I Drink

Joined
01 Jan 06
Moves
33672
Clock
28 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Damn it, there goes Mikey again with semantics.

Destruction is destruction, Redie, and it should be clear for a person
that explicitly supports war, as you clearly stated when saying you
support the use of violence by Palestinians.

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
28 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
Damn it, there goes Mikey again with semantics.

Destruction is destruction, Redie, and it should be clear for a person
that explicitly supports war, as you clearly stated when saying you
support the use of violence by Palestinians.
You've also explicitly said you support the use of violence in support of political ideals, so don't get all holier-than-thou.

Seitse
Doug Stanhope

That's Why I Drink

Joined
01 Jan 06
Moves
33672
Clock
28 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
You've also explicitly said you support the use of violence in support of political ideals, so don't get all holier-than-thou.
I don't, doll, that is why I don't enter into semantics because I do
know that I support the use of violence under certain circumstances.

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
28 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
I don't, doll, that is why I don't enter into semantics because I do
know that I support the use of violence under certain circumstances.
Right.

So you support violence in support of political ideals, so long as they are your political ideals.

Seitse
Doug Stanhope

That's Why I Drink

Joined
01 Jan 06
Moves
33672
Clock
28 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
Right.

So you support violence in support of political ideals, so long as they are[b] your
political ideals.[/b]
Nope. Once again twisting things, honey.

I just try to be coherent -which I recommend to you, friendly.

If derschawrzeritter (sorry for the spelling) says 'beheading and
hanging' and then you complain, and then he kindly reminds you
that the organization calls for the destruction of a country, it is
destruction, no matter it is bombs, beheading, hanging, gas chambers
or whatever. So, don't try to hide behinds semantics.

Period.

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
Nope. Once again twisting things, honey.

I just try to be coherent -which I recommend to you, friendly.

If derschawrzeritter (sorry for the spelling) says 'beheading and
hanging' and then you complain, and then he kindly reminds you
that the organization calls for the destruction of a country, it is
destruction, no matter it is bombs, beheading, hanging, gas chambers
or whatever. So, don't try to hide behinds semantics.

Period.
Is Israel attempting to destroy Palestine or are those friendly rockets and tanks?

I

Joined
12 Nov 06
Moves
211
Clock
29 Nov 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358
This is absolutely reasonable, provided that:

1) Israel withdraws from the occupied territories and dismantles all illegal settlements.

2) Israel pledges never to invade Palestinian territory again.

Sound like a plan!

Let's get going!
On condition that Hizbollah, Hezbollah, or wehatever they want to be called on any given day, agrees not to lob shells into Israeli civilian areas. Why should Israel give up the occupied territory when they earned it by shed Israeli blood....use it as a "buffer zone' when the militant Hezbollah decides to act stupid again...

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.