09 Oct 23
@athousandyoung saidNext time you have a broken window forget using glass try an Andrew Jackson statue instead, let us know how you get on.
https://www.bing.com/shop?q=andrew+jackson+statue&FORM=SHOPTB
@wajoma saidWhat do you think about the news that Trump has been convicted of fraud?
Next time you have a broken window forget using glass try an Andrew Jackson statue instead, let us know how you get on.
That's what the government is for, right Wajoma? Putting people who defraud others in prison? Protect you from me and me from you against force and fraud, right?
Perhaps instead of threatening people with 10 year sentences for vandalism Trump should have just fixed the Andrew Jackston statue with panes of glass.
09 Oct 23
@athousandyoung saidI'd call this a prank but you're going to be a cry baby about it. I especially enjoyed the running commentary with you posting as you were watching 😀 :^P
No, you've already shown that you are comfortable lying about what your referenced sources are about so why would I?
Rather than taking it for what it was you prefer bitter and twisted.
@wajoma saidIt's worth 15 minutes of my time to demonstrate your intellectual dishonesty to all the other people on the forum.
I'd call this a prank but you're going to be a cry baby about it. I especially enjoyed the running commentary with you posting as you were watching 😀 :^P
Rather than taking it for what it was you prefer bitter and twisted.
You're the boy who cried "Wolf!"
09 Oct 23
@athousandyoung saidAren't there enough trump threads?
What do you think about the news that Trump has been convicted of fraud?
That's what the government is for, right Wajoma? Putting people who defraud others in prison? Protect you from me and me from you against force and fraud, right?
Perhaps instead of threatening people with 10 year sentences for vandalism Trump should have just fixed the Andrew Jackston statue with panes of glass.
But since you ask, I don't care.
@wajoma saidYou have consistently shown yourself to hate fraud with a passion and you regularly post about how the government's job is to punish fraud.
Aren't there enough trump threads?
But since you ask, I don't care.
But now you don't care?
I suppose all your supposedly deeply held beliefs are really just a prank. I always believed that you felt that way for real but I guess we can just dismiss you as a lying prankster from now on.
09 Oct 23
@athousandyoung saidA prank is 'intellectual dishonesty'?
It's worth 15 minutes of my time to demonstrate your intellectual dishonesty to all the other people on the forum.
You're the boy who cried "Wolf!"
You take yourself too seriously.
09 Oct 23
@athousandyoung saidAnd it's a prank I'm still getting mileage out of, what a win, beyond expectations.
You have consistently shown yourself to hate fraud with a passion and you regularly post about how the government's job is to punish fraud.
But now you don't care?
I suppose all your supposedly deeply held beliefs are really just a prank. I always believed that you felt that way for real but I guess we can just dismiss you as a lying prankster from now on.
:^)
24 Oct 23
@no1marauder saidIt's not illegal to send messages goobermint thugs don't understand. Also this raises an inconsistency for you. On the one hand they were communicating their top secret overthrow of the worlds most powerful goobermint plan through encrypted messages yet on the other hand he blurts out a crucial tactical initiative i.e. "Don't leave" on his phone, or on a social media platform, or wherever that they'd surely know anyone can record and listen to.
Walking by the First National Bank in furtherance of a crime? Impossible!
We were talking about the use of encryption not Nordean's fashion choices anyway.
I have no idea whether the prosecutors considered Nordean's choice of clothing relevant or not; this is just another case of you trying to focus on unimportant trivia rather than the overall picture. It's an aff ...[text shortened]... the crowd.
How many times are you going to keep playing dumb like this (assuming you're playing)?
25 Oct 23
@wajoma saidI never said they weren't stupid bunglers.
It's not illegal to send messages goobermint thugs don't understand. Also this raises an inconsistency for you. On the one hand they were communicating their top secret overthrow of the worlds most powerful goobermint plan through encrypted messages yet on the other hand he blurts out a crucial tactical initiative i.e. "Don't leave" on his phone, or on a social media platform, or wherever that they'd surely know anyone can record and listen to.
But they made their criminal plan and carried it out to the best of their (limited) ability.
27 Oct 23
@no1marauder saidSo on one hand they knew which room, and which goobermint bureaurat, and what specific procedure was required to overthrow the result and thus the goobermint, (no proof and no details)
I never said they weren't stupid bunglers.
But they made their criminal plan and carried it out to the best of their (limited) ability.
...but on the other hand they were dumb enough to, oops forgot to encrypt the message, they blurt out critical tactical maneuvers for anyone listening to hear.
This reinforces what I've said all the way, the more No1 tries to explain, to hypothesize, to dramatize, the more insane he becomes. To his credit he has a go at creating theories, sunstroke rants like a maniac and others just run away.