Go back
Jullian Assange exposed election meddling

Jullian Assange exposed election meddling

Debates

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
13 Dec 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
Trump wanted Assange executed. Think about that.
Trump wanted to kill Assange for exposing election meddling in the DNC.

I thought democrats opposed everything Trump stood for. You agree with him on this???????
Apparently Trump wanted to kill Assange for helping the DNC root out a corrupt election meddler. Rooting out a corrupt election meddler is a good thing, a ser ...[text shortened]... o care about democracy.

https://rumble.com/vqmjt8-msnbcs-non-stop-lying-about-julian-assange.html
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/
Overall, we rate Rumble Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories and false information, use of poor sources, and a lack of transparency.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
13 Dec 21

@no1marauder said
You've probably started a hundred threads on this topic and still have learned nothing.

Everybody on Planet Earth who paid any attention to the 2016 Democratic primaries knew that the DNC Establishment favored HRC; in fact, it was a major message of the Sanders campaign. Assange, by publishing emails stolen by the Russian military, revealed absolutely nothing that anyo ...[text shortened]... idea that members of a partisan organization can "meddle" in an election is hilariously ridiculous.
"Everybody on Planet Earth who paid any attention to the 2016 Democratic primaries knew that the DNC Establishment favored HRC"

How popular she was has absolutely nothing to do with it. DWS conspired to steal the primary election from Sanders so Hitlery would win the primary. She resigned in disgrace and Hitlery rewarded DWS for her loyalty.

" Assange, by publishing emails stolen by the Russian military"

There you go again spreading misinformation. There is no evidence Assange got those emails from Russia and Assange denied he got them from Russia. The source was an inside job and likely Seth Rich.

DWS conspired to meddled in the primary election. It was proven and she was forced to resign in disgrace. That fact is hilarious and you are ridiculous making such absurd assertions in the contrary.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
13 Dec 21

@jimm619 said
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/
Is that your bible? A left wing opinion piece?

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
13 Dec 21

@metal-brain said
Is that your bible? A left wing opinion piece?
Try again, MD.
Rumble is FAKE NEWS

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
13 Dec 21

Assange exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz's efforts to meddle in the democrat primary election to steal the primary election from Bernie Sanders and give it to Hitlery Clinton.

Thank you Jullian Assange. You are a hero. You exposed corruption in the DNC and forced DWS to resign in disgrace. You have done all Americans a great service, especially democrats. It was their DNC that was improved because of it.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
13 Dec 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
Assange exposed Debbie Wasserman Schultz's efforts to meddle in the democrat primary election to steal the primary election from Bernie Sanders and give it to Hitlery Clinton.

Thank you Jullian Assange. You are a hero. You exposed corruption in the DNC and forced DWS to resign in disgrace. You have done all Americans a great service, especially democrats. It was their DNC that was improved because of it.
Why was TRUMP communicating
with Wikileaks?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-secret-correspondence-between-donald-trump-jr-and-wikileaks/545738/
LEFT-CENTER BIAS
Overall, we rate The Atlantic Left-Center Biased due to editorial positions and High for factual reporting based on excellent sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
13 Dec 21

@jimm619 said
Why was TRUMP communicating
with Wikileaks?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-secret-correspondence-between-donald-trump-jr-and-wikileaks/545738/
Opposition research I would imagine.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
13 Dec 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
"Everybody on Planet Earth who paid any attention to the 2016 Democratic primaries knew that the DNC Establishment favored HRC"

How popular she was has absolutely nothing to do with it. DWS conspired to steal the primary election from Sanders so Hitlery would win the primary. She resigned in disgrace and Hitlery rewarded DWS for her loyalty.

" Assange, by publishing ...[text shortened]... sgrace. That fact is hilarious and you are ridiculous making such absurd assertions in the contrary.
The Mueller Report directly traces the emails sent to Wikileaks to the Russian military; it even identifies the name of one of the files: wk dnc link1.txt.gpg. Mueller Report, p. 46.

"Conspiracy" usually implies some level of secrecy; DWS openly supported HRC (here's an article 4 months before her resignation indicating her open support: https://observer.com/2016/03/even-an-endorsement-from-potus-cant-save-debbie-wasserman-schultz/) as did most members of the DNC Committees. True, she resigned her position on the eve of the Democratic Convention as a sop to Sanders supporters, but it remains ridiculous to accuse people holding partisan positions in political parties of "meddling" by supporting Candidate A rather than Candidate B in party primaries. That you can't see the difference between such mundane political maneuvering and actively seeking and receiving aid from foreign militaries is absurd.

And Wikileaks only released the DWS emails right before the Democratic National Convention, long after the primaries had concluded. The intent was obviously to hurt HRC's chances and boost Donald Trump's - just like the Russian government intended.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
13 Dec 21

@no1marauder said
The Mueller Report directly traces the emails sent to Wikileaks to the Russian military; it even identifies the name of one of the files: wk dnc link1.txt.gpg. Mueller Report, p. 46.

"Conspiracy" usually implies some level of secrecy; DWS openly supported HRC (here's an article 4 months before her resignation indicating her open support: https://observer.com/2016/03/ev ...[text shortened]... bviously to hurt HRC's chances and boost Donald Trump's - just like the Russian government intended.
"The Mueller Report directly traces the emails sent to Wikileaks to the Russian military"

FALSE!
The DNC did not allow the FBI access to the DNC servers. Crowdstrike had direct access to the servers, not the FBI and Crowdstrike admitted under oath (under penalty of perjury) that they had no evidence Russia hacked the DNC as has been proven to you countless times.

Openly supporting a candidate is not an issue. DWS did not resign in disgrace for merely openly supporting Hitlery. You are digressing into irrelevant nonsense to obfuscate. STOP IT!

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
13 Dec 21

@metal-brain said
"The Mueller Report directly traces the emails sent to Wikileaks to the Russian military"

FALSE!
The DNC did not allow the FBI access to the DNC servers. Crowdstrike had direct access to the servers, not the FBI and Crowdstrike admitted under oath (under penalty of perjury) that they had no evidence Russia hacked the DNC as has been proven to you countless times.

...[text shortened]... merely openly supporting Hitlery. You are digressing into irrelevant nonsense to obfuscate. STOP IT!
Your second paragraph continues to repeat a lie I have repeatedly debunked. Crowdstrike has always and continues to maintain that it has overwhelming evidence that the hacking was done by the Russian government. You should stop lying about this.

We've went all over this BS many times and I'm not interested in dealing with your crazy conspiracy theories and repeated lies. You've obviously never even read the Mueller Report; Wikileaks receiving of the stolen emails from the GRU and the mountain of evidence supporting this fact is laid out in Vol. I, pp. 44-48. Read it.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
13 Dec 21

Apparently no1 has no idea why DWS resigned in disgrace. I suggest he does his research before making a fool out of himself.

hint: "no, we are going to stop him". Referring to Sanders.
Action words.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22664
Clock
13 Dec 21

@no1marauder said
Your second paragraph continues to repeat a lie I have repeatedly debunked. Crowdstrike has always and continues to maintain that it has overwhelming evidence that the hacking was done by the Russian government. You should stop lying about this.

We've went all over this BS many times and I'm not interested in dealing with your crazy conspiracy theories and repeated lie ...[text shortened]... the GRU and the mountain of evidence supporting this fact is laid out in Vol. I, pp. 44-48. Read it.
"Crowdstrike has always and continues to maintain that it has overwhelming evidence that the hacking was done by the Russian government"

That is a lie and you know it!
Grow up!

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
13 Dec 21

@metal-brain said
Apparently no1 has no idea why DWS resigned in disgrace. I suggest he does his research before making a fool out of himself.

hint: "no, we are going to stop him". Referring to Sanders.
Action words.
It was not because Julian Assange selflessly decided to reveal that the DNC favored HRC over Bernie so that the primaries could be run more "fairly". The primaries were already over.

She resigned because the Sanders wing wanted her out and the DNC decided it was best for party unity for her to go after stolen emails revealed some rather embarrassing statements she made to other officials.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
13 Dec 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
"Crowdstrike has always and continues to maintain that it has overwhelming evidence that the hacking was done by the Russian government"

That is a lie and you know it!
Grow up!
I'm not going to waste further time with this BS. I've provided the Crowdstrike link (https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/) numerous times showing your RCP opinion piece was inaccurate and misleading.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
13 Dec 21

@no1marauder said
Your second paragraph continues to repeat a lie I have repeatedly debunked. Crowdstrike has always and continues to maintain that it has overwhelming evidence that the hacking was done by the Russian government. You should stop lying about this.

We've went all over this BS many times and I'm not interested in dealing with your crazy conspiracy theories and repeated lie ...[text shortened]... the GRU and the mountain of evidence supporting this fact is laid out in Vol. I, pp. 44-48. Read it.
Marauder cuts to
the chase with FACTS.
You should try it, Mental Stain,
you know, just for a change of pace.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.