Originally posted by bbarrI think their position is somewhere in between these two.
So, homosexual marriages don't harm the institution of marriage itself, but merely offend heterosexuals by using the term 'marriage' for relationships they consider inferior, unnatural or profane.
I am not an electrician. Suppose I bribe somebody to
write me a certification as one, and under that certification
I sell my services as an electrician. My customers are not
pleased with my shoddy work.
The next electrician that comes along, who has a valid
certification of the same variety I did, to bid on a project
for that customer will be seen in a worse light due to the
fact that that certification doesn't guarantee a real
electrician.
Thus my being certified as an electrician harmed the
reputation of all other legitimate ones with that same
certification.
Dr. Cribs
Originally posted by CribsInteresting analogy. In your analogy, customers are harmed by your shoddy work, and it is in virtue of this harm that the reputation of certified electricians suffers. Now, where is the analogous harm caused by homosexual marriage?
I think their position is somewhere in between these two.
I am not an electrician. Suppose I bribe somebody to
write me a certification as one, and under that certification
I sell my services as an electrician. My customers are not
pleased with my shoddy work.
The next electrician that comes along, who has a valid
certification of the same variety ...[text shortened]... armed the
reputation of all other legitimate ones with that same
certification.
Dr. Cribs
Originally posted by bbarrWell, of course I would have to get into the anti-gay marriage
Interesting analogy. In your analogy, customers are harmed by your shoddy work, and it is in virtue of this harm that the reputation of certified electricians suffers. Now, where is the analogous harm caused by homosexual marriage?
mindset to answer this, so to speculate...
The reputation of electricians was harmed because
the bogus electrician is not capable of meeting the
duties required for certification.
Perhaps the anti-gay marriage position is that the reputation of traditional
marriage is harmed because gay couples are not capable of meeting
the duties required under "marriage certification," whatever
those may be, such as raising healthy children or being
pillars of the community.
Dr. Cribs
P.S. After rereading my post, I feel that I have totally dodged
the question through clever wording. I think I am catching
something from ivanhoe. I don't have a real answer I guess.
Originally posted by ScheelIf this is the case, why should the government sanction or deny
In my view marriage will solely be the business of me and my loved.
marriage of any sort?
Would you seek a marriage license, or would you just live
happily ever after without getting the government involved?
Dr. Cribs
Originally posted by bbarrThis is the exact question I could not answer. So I just said... "Bad as I hate to admit it, they can marry if they want. They are still not a breeding couple as nature dictates. If they can live with that? Who am I to rain on the parade?"
[ Now, where is the analogous harm caused by homosexual marriage?[/b]
Mike
Originally posted by StarValleyWyDo we really need everyone on earth to be breeding couples? Aren't there way too many people as it is?
This is the exact question I could not answer. So I just said... "Bad as I hate to admit it, they can marry if they want. They are still not a breeding couple as nature dictates. If they can live with that? Who am I to rain on the parade?"
Mike
Originally posted by StarValleyWyMy definition of freeedom is letting adults make their own decisions - even if I do not approve of what they do.
This is the exact question I could not answer. So I just said... "Bad as I hate to admit it, they can marry if they want. They are still not a breeding couple as nature dictates. If they can live with that? Who am I to rain on the parade?"
Mike
So I will make a deal with the homosexual community - keep out of my private life and I will keep out of yours.