Go back
Let the lying begin

Let the lying begin

Debates

stellspalfie

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
95105
Clock
10 Jun 14

Originally posted by normbenign
There are plenty of Hilary moments to question, even though in her first 8 years in the spotlight it wasn't an elected position. One of my favorites was when she turned the Whitehouse travel office into a partisan plum by ending the career of someone who had served Presidents of both parties with her lies.

You don't have to like Bush and Cheney, but they were both straight up truthful guys compared to either Mr. or Mrs. Clinton.
Bush and Cheney, but they were both straight up truthful guys compared to either Mr. or Mrs. Clinton.

did you manage to type that with a straight face?

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
10 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Assuming she did not lie about Benghazi and the dead Americans there.

Oh, and don't forget she voted to go to war in Iraq and then watched it all unfold and did nothing to stop it.
4 american lives lost in the benghazi attack are at the same level as the war in iraq which claimed how many american lives? how many injured? how many iraqis?

how about the level of clinton's involvement in the benghazi incident? did she caused it? did her incompetence led to it? and is it at the same level as bush/cheney dragging the US into iraq?

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
10 Jun 14

Originally posted by normbenign
There are plenty of Hilary moments to question, even though in her first 8 years in the spotlight it wasn't an elected position. One of my favorites was when she turned the Whitehouse travel office into a partisan plum by ending the career of someone who had served Presidents of both parties with her lies.

You don't have to like Bush and Cheney, but they were both straight up truthful guys compared to either Mr. or Mrs. Clinton.
"You don't have to like Bush and Cheney, but they were both straight up
truthful guys compared to either Mr. or Mrs. Clinton."

bwahahahahahaha

they straight up, without a doubt, lied to everyone that saddam had wmds. with absolutely no evidence to support it. they said they were sure of it. they are directly responsible for the iraq war and every horror resulted from that.

the fact that you defend them is disgusting to me. and probably many others. like the first responders you would deny health treatment to.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
10 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
4 american lives lost in the benghazi attack are at the same level as the war in iraq which claimed how many american lives? how many injured? how many iraqis?

how about the level of clinton's involvement in the benghazi incident? did she caused it? did her incompetence led to it? and is it at the same level as bush/cheney dragging the US into iraq?
Mrs. Clinton has the luxury of not being directly responsible for either the Iraq war or Benghazi. All she has to do is deny any responsibility for either, which is a lie.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
11 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Mrs. Clinton has the luxury of not being directly responsible for either the Iraq war or Benghazi. All she has to do is deny any responsibility for either, which is a lie.
oh so you agree she is nowhere near the terrible duo's level.


cool.
glad we figured that one out. do you want me now to keep defending clinton? as any of them is some kind of saint? is that what you want in a politician? can a politician survive and do his/her job without lying?


so no, i never claimed any of the clintons is a saint. the bill clinton was however a good president. even when you're not comparing him with the worst president after the second world war.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
11 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
[b. like the first responders you would deny health treatment to.[/b]
That's exactly what you do zahalanzi.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
11 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
oh so you agree she is nowhere near the terrible duo's level.


cool.
glad we figured that one out. do you want me now to keep defending clinton? as any of them is some kind of saint? is that what you want in a politician? can a politician survive and do his/her job without lying?


so no, i never claimed any of the clintons is a saint. the bill c ...[text shortened]... ident. even when you're not comparing him with the worst president after the second world war.
I never said any such thing. All I'm saying is she has not been able to sit in the Oval Office herself so we can sit and watch her try to distance herself from all the crap she is in charge of like what we see Obama do.

I'm waiting for the day she wins the Presidency and a major scandal breaks out and she says that she just heard about it on the CBS evening news like everyone else.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
11 Jun 14

Originally posted by whodey
I never said any such thing. All I'm saying is she has not been able to sit in the Oval Office herself so we can sit and watch her try to distance herself from all the crap she is in charge of like what we see Obama do.

I'm waiting for the day she wins the Presidency and a major scandal breaks out and she says that she just heard about it on the CBS evening news like everyone else.
you wait for horrible crap to happen so you could say "i told you so"?

isn't that a bit sociopathic?

n

The Catbird's Seat

Joined
21 Oct 06
Moves
2598
Clock
15 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
"You don't have to like Bush and Cheney, but they were both straight up
truthful guys compared to either Mr. or Mrs. Clinton."

bwahahahahahaha

they straight up, without a doubt, lied to everyone that saddam had wmds. with absolutely no evidence to support it. they said they were sure of it. they are directly responsible for the iraq war and every ho ...[text shortened]... g to me. and probably many others. like the first responders you would deny health treatment to.
"they straight up, without a doubt, lied to everyone that saddam had wmds. with absolutely no evidence to support it. they said they were sure of it."

And Mrs. Clinton twice voted for military involvement in Iraq. Was she perpetuating a lie? Was she deceived? Presuming, as you do, that there never were any WMDs in Iraq, you have to believe also that Mrs. Clinton didn't know better, and perhaps that Bush and Cheney didn't know better. It is real easy to Monday morning quarterback, months later.

You are fairly disgusting too. I would much rather disgust you than myself.

b
Enigma

Seattle

Joined
03 Sep 06
Moves
3298
Clock
16 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/06/09/hillary-clinton-claims-she-and-bill-clinton-were-dead-broke-when-they-left-the-white-house-see-some-of-the-numbers-for-yourself/

Now that everyone knows that Hillary Clinton will be the next president, now I guess is as good a time as any to let the lies start flowing. The best one yet is that she said once she and her husband left the White House they were dead broke.
Admit it Whodey...you love Hillary. 😀

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
16 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by normbenign
"they straight up, without a doubt, lied to everyone that saddam had wmds. with absolutely no evidence to support it. they said they were sure of it."

And Mrs. Clinton twice voted for military involvement in Iraq. Was she perpetuating a lie? Was she deceived? Presuming, as you do, that there never were any WMDs in Iraq, you have to believe also tha ...[text shortened]... k, months later.

You are fairly disgusting too. I would much rather disgust you than myself.
the difference is, i have a reason, a very good reason, for finding you disgusting.

even the asholes that voted against the first responders getting aid knew it was morally reprehensible what they were doing. they at least tried to offer excuses (horrible ones, but still). the fact that those men and women don't deserve help was never on anyone's mind (well except on a select few scums)


back to the discussion, there is a slight difference between straight up misrepresenting an issue (lying) and someone voting on it. the war in iraq was presented as absolutely necessary. do you fault congressmen and women (who had limited access to intelligence) or the people who lied to them?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
16 Jun 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
you wait for horrible crap to happen so you could say "i told you so"?

isn't that a bit sociopathic?
So we are suppose to ignore the lies and then vote for them a second time?

That's called insanity.

Here's an idea, lets just ignore the sociopaths in office and pick on Whodey. 😵

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
16 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bill718
Admit it Whodey...you love Hillary. 😀
Hillary is in love with herself.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
Clock
16 Jun 14
1 edit

Originally posted by whodey
So we are suppose to ignore the lies and then vote for them a second time?

That's called insanity.

Here's an idea, lets just ignore the sociopaths in office and pick on Whodey. 😵
this post has nothing to do with what i said or what you said for that matter.

no, we don't ignore lies.

but we don't giggle in anticipation at the thought of a possible future tragedy just so we can stick it to hillary. that would be pretty much textbook sociopath behavior.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
16 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

I may be confused, but what are the "lies"? I thought Clinton's quote was pretty amusing, since it is characteristic of the detachment from the real world in America's elite, and the class-based society that produces such people. Almost as embarrassing as Romney's 49%-moment.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.