Go back
Liberated citizens should share oil wealth?

Liberated citizens should share oil wealth?

Debates

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
23 Mar 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Whether or not that is true, it does not follow that therefore the most productive get the most money.
No; but that's generally true for other reasons.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
23 Mar 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
No; but that's generally true for other reasons.
I don't agree.

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
23 Mar 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
No; but that's generally true for other reasons.
Account for Bernard Madoff.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
23 Mar 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Account for Bernard Madoff.
Criminals can exist under any type of economic system.

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
23 Mar 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Criminals can exist under any type of economic system.
It's an easy task separating the criminals from the super producers, isn't it?

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
23 Mar 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
It's an easy task separating the criminals from the super producers, isn't it?
There's an overlap, obviously. Michael Milken was both a super producer and a criminal.

Bernie Madoff produced very little because everything he produced was based on fraud. He was a criminal and not a super producer.

Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Larry Page and Mark Zuckerberg are super producers and not criminals.

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
23 Mar 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76

Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Larry Page and Mark Zuckerberg are super producers and not criminals.
So there's a line and sometimes it's blurred. Sometimes wealth is a function of talent, sometimes it's a function of who you know. You can't generalise or moralise about how good or bad wealthy people are purely on the basis of them being wealthy. Right?

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
23 Mar 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
So there's a line and sometimes it's blurred. Sometimes wealth is a function of talent, sometimes it's a function of who you know. You can't generalise or moralise about how good or bad wealthy people are purely on the basis of them being wealthy. Right?
Absolutely right.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
23 Mar 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
23 Mar 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
It's an easy task separating the criminals from the super producers, isn't it?
Heirs are neither. Capitalists are neither.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.