11 Feb 06
Originally posted by royalchickenWell, I just learned in the Spiritual Forum that if two people have incompatible beliefs, and both claim that their belief is the only truth, the logical conclusion is that they are both wrong. 😉
But Mike, everyone's contradictory opinion is equally correct! Didn't you learn anything in the 60s 😛?
11 Feb 06
Originally posted by NordlysThis is known as the Law of the Excluded Left, Right and Centre.
Well, I just learned in the Spiritual Forum that if two people have incompatible beliefs, and both claim that their belief is the only truth, the logical conclusion is that they are both wrong. 😉
12 Feb 06
Originally posted by NordlysDoes that mean in a universe run on logic, the assured way of discrediting a truth would be to simply formulate a belief that was in total opposition to it, such that the truth would eventually be abandoned due to the paradigm of absolute knowledge having been supplanted by a more relatavistic way of thinking?
Well, I just learned in the Spiritual Forum that if two people have incompatible beliefs, and both claim that their belief is the only truth, the logical conclusion is that they are both wrong. 😉
12 Feb 06
Originally posted by skeeterYour obvious ploy here is to try to have people buy into the moon
Space is supposed to be at absolute zero. Anything directly in the sunshine heats up incredibly. Skylab overheated when one of its solar panels failed to deploy correctly, yet Apollo 13, in direct sunlight and in a lethal radiation zone, supposedly got cold. On the launch pad the ship is air conditioned from ground services . In space the ship is air condit ...[text shortened]... cy of 100%.
Yet NASA claimed 4 hours of remote LEM operation per astronaut.
skeeter
landing hoax theory. Space is not absolute zero, its about 2.7 degrees
C, all your ideas about thermal conductivity could be laid to rest if
you google in thermal energy and actually studied the issue. You
remind me of the ID'ers who just want to tear down a theory but
have no interest in actually learning something, like the truth.
For someone with such a high rating, its hard to see why you are
so obsessive about trying to prove a moonlanding hoax. You are
obviously intelligent, so are a lot of people here. Why don't you use
that intelligence to understand how it WAS done rather than keep
trying to simply tear down what was one of the most incredible
scientific achievments of mankind ever, so far. Think about how did
they get the incredible variety of moon rocks back, I see arguments
that they are real moon rocks but just done by machine. How could
a machine make such discriminating choices of rocks, which were
chosen by geologists? You apparently think technology was not
anywhere advanced enough for mankind to have actually landed on
the moon but how do you explain the obvious intelligence guiding the
choices of what rocks were brought back? You can't on the one hand
believe NASA was so backwards it was forced to fake a moon landing
but at the same time believe they were so advanced that an
unattended moonrock selecting machine brought back those
interesting rocks, which were not a random selection. Take a look at
the mars rovers, Not even NOW do those rovers have the intelligence
to select which rocks to examine closer. They have to have geologists
back home at the other end of the tv camera to select the good stuff.
So you can't have it both ways, either NASA had the expertise to
go to the moon and back several times or they didn't have the
expertise and so could also not have made intelligent choices of
moon rock to bring back. You have seen no doubt the images from
the moon, they were not very hi res. You think that technology could
have led ground crews to select interesting rocks to bring back?
12 Feb 06
Originally posted by sonhouseactually it's about 2.7 degrees K, not C. (about -271C)
Your obvious ploy here is to try to have people buy into the moon
landing hoax theory. Space is not absolute zero, its about 2.7 degrees
C, all your ideas about thermal conductivity could be laid to rest if
you google in thermal energy and actually studied the issue. You
remind me of the ID'ers who just want to tear down a theory but
have no interest ...[text shortened]... ink that technology could
have led ground crews to select interesting rocks to bring back?
12 Feb 06
Originally posted by bbi2And you haven't presented a single scrap of meaningful evidence supporting your claim that a giant conspiracy existed encompassing almost a million people almost 40 years ago and has yet to be exposed.
again sonhouse has no evidence to back up his wild defence of Nasa.
😀
12 Feb 06
Originally posted by bbi2I take it by not talking about it, you also believe the holocaust
im not trying to prove anything to anyone.
i just think the moon landings were fake.
thats my opinion.
Just cos your gullible to believe any old tripe, dont try pushing
your outlandish points of view my way... 😛😉
never happened, you never answered my charge on that one.
So what is it?