Debates
06 Jun 21
09 Jun 21
@suzianne saidI refer you back to the post of mine which you are replying to,
I see, so you just hate them for speaking out against a worn out relic of the past (the monarchy). One wonders about your own upbringing to be so consistently hateful of those expressing a different opinion than you. And I might also mention that Harry has lived within it his entire life, and so could be excused for having a different take on the monarchy and the people within it than a spectator all too eager to wave the Union Jack and call it a day.
@divegeester saidYour wrong though, they explicitly exempted the Queen and Prince Philip from their implicit criticism of some members of the family. They didn’t explicitly name anyone as having the racist conversation about the babies potential skin tone but they explicitly ruled out grandma Lilibet.
No, not in the slightest.
Someone naming their baby after the childhood baby-name of the head of a family whom they have recently viciously attacked in a targeted cynical interview having previously resigned from the institution they represent, does make me cringe.
This pair of attention seeking muppets are not the tools you are looking for to attack the British Monarchy.
10 Jun 21
@shavixmir saidThey fill the void left when people stopped gossiping over the garden fence about her down the road.
Does anyone give a 💩 about these people?
Damn. This forum’s got loads more interesting folk on it than those rich parasites.
But no, no one really cares about them any more than they really care about the Kardashians.
10 Jun 21
@kevcvs57 saidAnd you think that is acceptable behaviour! Gosh. Ok.
Your wrong though, they explicitly exempted the Queen and Prince Philip from their implicit criticism of some members of the family. They didn’t explicitly name anyone as having the racist conversation about the babies potential skin tone but they explicitly ruled out grandma Lilibet.
10 Jun 21
@shavixmir saidYou sound a bit like Sonhouse shouting “who gives a crap, it’s all bull****” in the spirituality forum.
Does anyone give a 💩 about these people?
Damn. This forum’s got loads more interesting folk on it than those rich parasites.
10 Jun 21
@kevcvs57 saidIt’s global news!
They fill the void left when people stopped gossiping over the garden fence about her down the road.
But no, no one really cares about them any more than they really care about the Kardashians.
What are you on about?
10 Jun 21
1 edit
Harry and Meghan classic…
“There was a conversion way back with the queen about using the name Lilibeth”
Authorised Palace spokesperson to BBC
“This conversation never happened”
Harry and Maghan’s lawyers have written to the BBC insisting that the claims are “false and defamatory”
The media shy couple continue seek privacy.
11 Jun 21
1 edit
@divegeester saidDo I think what is acceptable behaviour?
And you think that is acceptable behaviour! Gosh. Ok.
Naming your daughter after her great grandmother? Yes I do.
Is it really grinding your gears that much that there are persons of colour in the Royal Family.
I think they are all heading for redundancy because of the way the younger ones have reacted to this situation. From Charlie big ears downwards they are not fit to wear the crown.