Debates
12 Sep 23
13 Sep 23
@averagejoe1 saidWell if illiberal states can ban an individual from leaving the state fir medical care I guess all bets are off. Welcome to the world of your dreams Joe
https://reason.com/2023/09/10/new-mexicos-governor-suspends-the-right-to-bear-arms-saying-the-second-amendment-is-not-absolute/
This link speaks for itself. So, what do you libs think about this? And if an individual decides something is a 'State of Emergency' as she has done, can she decide and rule on ANYTHING that she considers a state of emergency.??
She ...[text shortened]... you will not bring yourselves here to be enraged? Follow along as usual with the rest of the sheep.
13 Sep 23
@earl-of-trumps saidWere 50,000 civilians a year killing each other when they were writing the constitution, you have to wonder what it would look like if it was written in the 19th century let alone the 21st 🤔
Constitution...? what's that? 🤔 🤔
13 Sep 23
@suzianne saidWrong.
You do understand that the right-wing in this country want to rewrite the Constitution in their own image, right?
Ha. I've always wanted to say Wrong to this dangling word that libs put at the end of their sentences.
Liberals have a hard time just saying what they mean.
13 Sep 23
@averagejoe1 saidYou are a moronic kunt.
Wrong.
Ha. I've always wanted to say Wrong to this dangling word that libs put at the end of their sentences.
Liberals have a hard time just saying what they mean.
13 Sep 23
@sonhouse saidSonhouse misses the point of this post. Typical. Typical lib.
@Suzianne
It's clear the gunites don't give a rats ass how many people die from gunshot wounds.
They want to have guns no matter if a MILLION die because of them.
This change is to prevent folks to concealed or open carry.
Gunites, tell me why all the citizens need open carry?
is there so much gun violence New Mexico folks need such weapons 24/7?
Are they back to Tombs ...[text shortened]... shyte, live with it, we are going to have guns and we don't care how many people die from gunshots.
It is about a governor who thinks she can issue an executive order in violation of the Constitution.
I would certainly like your opinion , though. Could you opine?
Y'all keep doing this. We need to have a class on 'issues'.
@averagejoe1 saidhttps://www.thenation.com/article/politics/convention-states-constitution/
Wrong.
Ha. I've always wanted to say Wrong to this dangling word that libs put at the end of their sentences.
Liberals have a hard time just saying what they mean.
The Article V movement is what I'm talking about, and it is repugnant that you pretend you don't know what I'm talking about.
13 Sep 23
@zahlanzi saidYeah, whatever about me, Zhalanzi.
have a whine about state rights.
you snowflakes constantly whine when someone does some shady crap you don't approove, the same kind you pull yourself on a regular basis
Everyone, this poster seems to be saying that averagejoe whines, but you see that that is irrelevant to this post about a governor ignoring the Constititution of the United States....when she swore to uphold it. What? Another lie under oath??
But let us give a thumb up to Z, who also seems to be saying
that this creep governor has done some 'shady crap'. Everyone, Z agrees with AvJoe!!!!
@sonhouse saidI must have missed something. What is your gun-issue recommendation, SHouse?
@Suzianne
It's clear the gunites don't give a rats ass how many people die from gunshot wounds.
They want to have guns no matter if a MILLION die because of them.
This change is to prevent folks to concealed or open carry.
Gunites, tell me why all the citizens need open carry?
is there so much gun violence New Mexico folks need such weapons 24/7?
Are they back to Tombs ...[text shortened]... shyte, live with it, we are going to have guns and we don't care how many people die from gunshots.
And another unanswered question to you faeirie libs...y'all in all these years have never, after talking reams about it, told us what is 'Fair Share'.
14 Sep 23
@kevcvs57 saidAnother democrat propaganda slogan. Now, the truth:
Were 50,000 civilians a year killing each other when they were writing the constitution, you have to wonder what it would look like if it was written in the 19th century let alone the 21st 🤔
Most firearm deaths are suicides
In 2021, 54% of firearm deaths in the US were suicides.
https://usafacts.org/data-projects/firearms-suicides
14 Sep 23
@earl-of-trumps saidSo 23.000 gun related murders a year then?
Another democrat propaganda slogan. Now, the truth:
Most firearm deaths are suicides
In 2021, 54% of firearm deaths in the US were suicides.
https://usafacts.org/data-projects/firearms-suicides
That sounds so much better.
14 Sep 23
@kevcvs57 saidThis is a lie. You might want to rephrase the exact situation that you seem to be writing about. Don't tell Sue that individuals are being banned from the leaving the state, please....these threads are mucked up enough by you libs!!!
Well if illiberal states can ban an individual from leaving the state fir medical care I guess all bets are off. Welcome to the world of your dreams Joe
14 Sep 23
@shavixmir saidHow about '50,000 match-related fires a year'. Your rationale is to ban matches?
So 23.000 gun related murders a year then?
That sounds so much better.
We need to pick it up a bit, Shav.
@shavixmir saidThe angst of the liberals has nothing to do with the # of deaths. It has to do with control. Wanna bet?
So 23.000 gun related murders a year then?
That sounds so much better.
2022 - 110,000 Overdose Deaths (most were fentanyl) - 5x as many
So... ya wanna' talk about how to lower that figure, like closing the US Southern border? ... didn't think so.
14 Sep 23
@earl-of-trumps saidBAM!
The angst of the liberals has nothing to do with the # of deaths. It has to do with control. Wanna bet?
2022 - 110,000 Overdose Deaths (most were fentanyl) - 5x as many
So... ya wanna' talk about how to lower that figure, like closing the US Southern border? ... didn't think so.
@averagejoe1 saidFYI
This is a lie. You might want to rephrase the exact situation that you seem to be writing about. Don't tell Sue that individuals are being banned from the leaving the state, please....these threads are mucked up enough by you libs!!!
Newsome of California has given up stopping people from traveling to states that are anti-LBG, which is unconstitutional.
California lawmakers vote to end travel ban to states with anti-LGBTQ+ laws
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/california-lawmakers-vote-end-travel-ban-states-anti-103104140
Dems just can't help their dictatorial ways. Ya, it's a disease
---------------------
Meanwhile, republicans stopping citizens of their state from getting out of state abortions is a RUMOR. Ain't happening.