Go back
No Amendment safe

No Amendment safe

Debates

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
18 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

If the courts can gut the Second Amendment as they've done in cities like Washington, D.C.; New York, Chicago and San Francisco, can they also gut the 13th Amendment ban on slavery?

mbakunin
Radio Gnome

Planet Gong

Joined
08 Mar 08
Moves
53641
Clock
18 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
If the courts can gut the Second Amendment as they've done in cities like Washington, D.C.; New York, Chicago and San Francisco, can they also gut the 13th Amendment ban on slavery?
do you want slavery to return?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
18 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
If the courts can gut the Second Amendment as they've done in cities like Washington, D.C.; New York, Chicago and San Francisco, can they also gut the 13th Amendment ban on slavery?
"Courts" passed the local gun control laws in those cities??????

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
18 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mbakunin
do you want slavery to return?
Of course not -- I'm using the literary devise known as "hyperbole" to make my argument.

mbakunin
Radio Gnome

Planet Gong

Joined
08 Mar 08
Moves
53641
Clock
18 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Of course not -- I'm using the literary devise known as "hyperbole" to make my argument.
your argument is absurd. the meaning of the second amendment is disputed. the thirteenth amendment however, isn't (by sane people)

duecer
anybody seen my

underpants??

Joined
01 Sep 06
Moves
56453
Clock
18 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
If the courts can gut the Second Amendment as they've done in cities like Washington, D.C.; New York, Chicago and San Francisco, can they also gut the 13th Amendment ban on slavery?
I refuse to accept the premise of your argument

P

weedhopper

Joined
25 Jul 07
Moves
8096
Clock
18 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
If the courts can gut the Second Amendment as they've done in cities like Washington, D.C.; New York, Chicago and San Francisco, can they also gut the 13th Amendment ban on slavery?
I fear the courts can do anything nowadays--take weapons, take private property "for public good", whatever that means, so sure, nothing is off the table.

m

Joined
07 Sep 05
Moves
35068
Clock
18 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
I fear the courts can do anything nowadays--take weapons, take private property "for public good", whatever that means, so sure, nothing is off the table.
It means "for the good of the public". You may have met some of them.

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
18 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mbakunin
do you want slavery to return?
Bring it back? You need to read this:

http://rationalinternational.blogspot.com/2008/02/modern-slave-trade.html

r

Joined
16 Mar 08
Moves
575
Clock
19 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mbakunin
[b]the meaning of the second amendment is disputed.b]
What is there to dispute? "shall not be infringed" means "shall not be infringed".

mbakunin
Radio Gnome

Planet Gong

Joined
08 Mar 08
Moves
53641
Clock
19 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rookedpawn
What is there to dispute? "shall not be infringed" means "shall not be infringed".
what i mean by disputed is that not everyone agrees to it's relevance today, and that it doesn't necessarily mean that everyone should be allowed to have as many guns as they want.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#The_Second_Amendment_and_modern_politics

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
19 Mar 08
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

convicted felons should wear anklets with stun guns triggerable by any citizen in the area, wirelessly.

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
19 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

no minimum age. no insanity or moron defense.

a
Andrew Mannion

Melbourne, Australia

Joined
17 Feb 04
Moves
54005
Clock
19 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Isn't the purpose of a constitutional amendment to make the constitution maintain its relevance?
So, if an amendment is irrelevant, then what's wrong with doing away with it?
These US ammendments seem to be treated like holy texts - they must be maintained at all costs. I would've thought that the constitution and its amendments were simply useful working documents for a nation.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89784
Clock
19 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
If the courts can gut the Second Amendment as they've done in cities like Washington, D.C.; New York, Chicago and San Francisco, can they also gut the 13th Amendment ban on slavery?
Obviously no amendment is "safe".
Nothing is absolutely true and everything's truth is only comparable to the times in which they "are".

So, what was true and just 200 years ago could well be out-dated nowadays.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.