Obama

Originally posted by Badwater
Since the original stimulus money was Bush's idea and went to Wall Street - and has hardly been accounted for - I can see how your objective disapproval of Obama is warranted.

NOT.

Bush isn't President anymore, and Obama has continued and doubled down on Bush's erroneous decision.

Originally posted by josephw
The Liar.

"And you ain't seen nothing yet."

Heres a fine example.

9/12/2008 Dover,NH "No family making less than $250,000 a year will see ANY FORM of tax increase"
To emphasize the point he continued,"Not your income taxes,not your payroll tax,not your capital gains taxes,NOT ANY OF YOUR TAXES"

4/1/2009 Federal excise tax on tobacco increased 156%. Who does this hurt? The wealthy top 5% ? No,the little man. 1 in 4 smokers live below the poverty line and 55% are considered working poor according to americans for tax reform.
Stay tuned,much more tax in various forms are coming down the pike

Originally posted by josephw
The Liar.

"And you ain't seen nothing yet."

get out of it. they should have a bolitix forum for this sort of stuff, so we can avoid it.
ive seen the propaganda the republicans are putting out on the net, its so transparent it should only fool their own redneck supporters

Originally posted by utherpendragon
Heres a fine example.

9/12/2008 Dover,NH "No family making less than $250,000 a year will see ANY FORM of tax increase"
To emphasize the point he continued,"Not your income taxes,not your payroll tax,not your capital gains taxes,NOT ANY OF YOUR TAXES"

4/1/2009 Federal excise tax on tobacco increased 156%. Who does this hurt? The wealthy top 5 ...[text shortened]... mericans for tax reform.
Stay tuned,much more tax in various forms are coming down the pike

Meanwhile Obama is speding us into the ground so that the coming administrations will have little choice except to raise taxes. Either that or the country goes belly up. I call it, the BUsh Doctrine.

Originally posted by josephw
The Liar.

"And you ain't seen nothing yet."

Why is the title of this thread "Obama"? Shouldn't it be "Cheney"? Or "Agnew"?

Originally posted by scherzo
Why is the title of this thread "Obama"? Shouldn't it be "Cheney"? Or "Agnew"?

The OP is nothing but an unjustified attack on Obama, don't go down to his level by doing the same thing to Cheney or Agnew, or whoever.

Originally posted by generalissimo
The OP is nothing but an unjustified attack on Obama, don't go down to his level by doing the same thing to Cheney or Agnew, or whoever.

I just justified his op. He is a liar. No,I take that back.He is just forgetful of his promises.

Originally posted by utherpendragon
I just justified his op. He is a liar. No,I take that back.He is just forgetful of his promises.

"The Liar.

"And you ain't seen nothing yet.""

This isn't even a proper argument, the original poster has the duty to justify his claims, not you.

Originally posted by eamon o
get out of it. they should have a bolitix forum for this sort of stuff, so we can avoid it.
ive seen the propaganda the republicans are putting out on the net, its so transparent it should only fool their own redneck supporters

And your implicitly comparing the absurd meaningless attack of the op to statements of Republicans "out on the net" is just as meaningless as the op's statement; if not more so. His meaningless attack is against one person. Your meaningless attack is against millions.