Originally posted by DeepThoughtThat was not the motivation and it was a foolish decision.
As I recall it was part of the motivation for the Bank of England selling off about half of its gold reserves in the early 2000s. You have to pay for the storage and 15 or so billion dollars worth of gold comes with significant storage costs. Government bonds take up much less space than gold. Banks would prefer all transactions to be electronic.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/gold/7511589/Explain-why-you-sold-Britains-gold-Gordon-Brown-told.html
I would like to know who bought the gold. That might explain a lot.
Originally posted by Metal BrainThe saving some gold could be prudent even in a SGTF scenario. At some point, after a crisis, things return to normal or whatever normal is after the crisis. Then it is quite likely that gold will have a relationship to the new currency.
Gold does not corrode. No worries there.