338d
@averagejoe1 saidShareholders. I would shoot every last fukking one of them. Parasites.
Parasites??? That is a misstatement, meant to mislead many of our fans. Careful, you may knock yourself off the most revered first place amongst trusted posters.
Your disdain for shareholders evidences your obvious hatred for the rich. Why, how, does their richness have anything to do with you? I never have gotten that about you libs, always looking over the fence. And, probably someone ELSE's fence.
And if you disagree, I’d fukkin’ shoot you too.
338d
@sonhouse saidI sincerely do not understand your point, since rental rates are negotiated between the two parties. Note that the 'sticker price (MSRP)' on a car is merely a suggestion. You haggle it out. I might fix rent at $1100 for a single couple. Then a really nice couple comes in =, with 3 children, cutting it close, so I may charge them $875 just because I want to.
@AverageJoe1
You mean you practice limiting profit on your rentals? Keep profit under 100%?
What have you, pray tell, or the government, got to do with the arrangement? Oh ....profit? Whatever I want it to be. I do not get your point. Let me see....Let's sah my profit is 14%. Then the landscaping company reduces their costs so mcuh that I am now making 22% profit!! 😀 . Do you dare suggest that I should 'pass on' this additional profit to a tenant?
Please answer and explain. You won't.
337d
@averagejoe1 saidJust shoot the kunts.
I sincerely do not understand your point, since rental rates are negotiated between the two parties. Note that the 'sticker price (MSRP)' on a car is merely a suggestion. You haggle it out. I might fix rent at $1100 for a single couple. Then a really nice couple comes in =, with 3 children, cutting it close, so I may charge them $875 just because I want to.
Wha ...[text shortened]... I should 'pass on' this additional profit to a tenant?
Please answer and explain. You won't.
Including yourself.
Christ I’m sick of you right-wing retards stupidifying the forums. FUKK OFF AND DIE!
337d
@shavixmir saidThen who would provide housing ??
Just shoot the kunts.
Including yourself.
Christ I’m sick of you right-wing retards stupidifying the forums. FUKK OFF AND DIE!
337d
@averagejoe1 saidSteal the housing from the rich.
Then who would provide housing ??
Just drag them outside and shoot the fukking parasites.
@shavixmir saidYou are serious!!
Steal the housing from the rich.
Just drag them outside and shoot the fukking parasites.
But if you kill the rich, who will you mooch off of?
337d
@AverageJoe1
It sure as hell wouldn't be YOU. If you make 14% profit I will eat my hat. My guess is more like 90% profit.
337d
@sonhouse saidI get that but who would you and Shav mooch off of? You never answer questions, Thumphouse.
@AverageJoe1
It sure as hell wouldn't be YOU. If you make 14% profit I will eat my hat. My guess is more like 90% profit.
336d
@averagejoe1 saidIt’s the rich who are mooching off the labour of the masses.
You are serious!!
But if you kill the rich, who will you mooch off of?
Drag them outside and shoot the fukkers. And anyone who sides with them.
336d
@fartacus saidWe shoot them too.
@shavixmir
Then some poor people become the rich and then what?
I have no inherent problem with rich people. I just hate people abusing people. And, quite generally, that’s how capitalists get rich. So, drag the fukkers out and shoot them.
And their supporters too. Too long we sit on this forum hearing right-wing stupidity defended by the utter gutter-crawlers of society; who sit at home spanking their monkies to fox news… and we politely argue with them.
No more. I’ve had it with the sad sacks of shyte. Drag them outside and shoot them for wasting my time.
336d
@fartacus saidYou’ve not been around long enough to have seen the same depleted arguments sweep by on the right-wing media cycle of garbage, year after year.
@shavixmir
How old are you?
Seriously. Taking them out and shooting them is the only solution.
And if you disagree, you are a kunt and should be dragged out and shot too.