Go back
One month ban For NO REASON

One month ban For NO REASON

Debates

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
27 Jan 21

@kevcvs57 said
Do you mean the electoral college that your despot boss tried to usurp?
Trump didn't try to usurp anything, he gave a speech and told his constituents about how the democrats stuffed ballot boxes to steal the election.
NO WAY Biden got over 80 million votes when he couldn't draw a crowd of 20 people while Trump was filling stadiums of 30 thousand supporters.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29595
Clock
27 Jan 21

@dood111 said
I didn't say NUTHIN wrong. Just got off 30 days and I want to know WHY!
Karma.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
27 Jan 21

@dood111 said
Trump didn't try to usurp anything, he gave a speech and told his constituents about how the democrats stuffed ballot boxes to steal the election.
NO WAY Biden got over 80 million votes when he couldn't draw a crowd of 20 people while Trump was filling stadiums of 30 thousand supporters.
Perhaps you were banned for stupidly or dishonesty. He ordered Pence to throw out the electors that gave Biden the swing states and the White House and when that didn’t work he sent the mob in to hang Pence. Watch a video now and again will yer.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
27 Jan 21

@suzianne said
Your boss would be proud. More disinformation.
Would some one please de-cypher the above? Who is 'Your' and who is 'boss'?

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
27 Jan 21

@dood111 said
Trump didn't try to usurp anything, he gave a speech and told his constituents about how the democrats stuffed ballot boxes to steal the election.
NO WAY Biden got over 80 million votes when he couldn't draw a crowd of 20 people while Trump was filling stadiums of 30 thousand supporters.
He didn't explain how at all. He just asserted it was happening. How is still a complete mystery.

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20416
Clock
27 Jan 21

@averagejoe1 said
For you of liberal persuasions, you see happening here what would happen in a world with no Electoral College, and no Filibuster. It all leads to one boss, one-party rule. If you think this through, it is probably not a good idea.
It *is* a good idea though, if you are a Ruling Democrat.

They're like Royalty, they never give up the throne. and the game is all about POWER, not fairness to all.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
27 Jan 21

@earl-of-trumps said
It *is* a good idea though, if you are a Ruling Democrat.

They're like Royalty, they never give up the throne. and the game is all about POWER, not fairness to all.
They have no persuadable reason to disband the Elec College, or the Filibuster, or they would have said it by now in this thread.
\
Last Chance....Why disband them, which sets up mob rule? The little cowboys in Wyoming will have zero voice. Tell us that the cowboy in WY should have no voice.

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20416
Clock
27 Jan 21

@averagejoe1 said
Would some one please de-cypher the above? Who is 'Your' and who is 'boss'?
You really want to try to interpret the spambot? 🤔
yikes.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
27 Jan 21

@wildgrass said
He didn't explain how at all. He just asserted it was happening. How is still a complete mystery.
The videos of people hauling and losing ballots left and right, the lack of provenance or whatever, looks a bit bad to me. Must be my upbringing .
Would one of you libs PLEASE explain how democrats want people to walk in off the street and vote without any ID? How does that make sense? If Suzianne is running for class president, and a poster here does not like her ideas, that poster can get his friends from over at Rydell High to come over to the school at lunch hour and vote for her opposition.
' WHY wont one of you comment on this logic? Can anyone say why that should not happen at Suzianne's school, but that it is OK to do that in important elections?
Anyone??

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
27 Jan 21
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
The videos of people hauling and losing ballots left and right, the lack of provenance or whatever, looks a bit bad to me. Must be my upbringing .
Would one of you libs PLEASE explain how democrats want people to walk in off the street and vote without any ID? How does that make sense? If Suzianne is running for class president, and a poster here does not like her ...[text shortened]... nne's school, but that it is OK to do that in important elections?
Anyone??
But the claims of fraud preceded the videos. "This is going to be a fraud like you've never seen." He essentially told us he was going to claim fraud irregardless of evidence if he lost. On what basis was he claiming Dems were stuffing ballot boxes before the election took place? One would think if this rhetoric were on the up-and-up they would have taken some concrete actions at that time to monitor it and/or petition for changes to election in court?

The videos you are describing may look bad but represent very small numbers of ballots in the grand scheme of things. Even if true, it's not enough to prove claims of stolen elections. Do you know whose name was checked on those ballots?

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
27 Jan 21

@wildgrass said
But the claims of fraud preceded the videos. "This is going to be a fraud like you've never seen." He essentially told us he was going to claim fraud irregardless of evidence if he lost. O
The pre-election claims of fraud were 100% correct because that's what the dems did.
And Irregardless isn't a word. It's REGARDLESS .

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
27 Jan 21

@AverageJoe1
If through voter suppression and such, if it were repubs in charge forever you would be dancing in the streets. Then ultrarightwingnuts like you will have a ball building the wall and Mexico pays for it and kicking out everyone with brown or black skin.
That would suit you just fine.

On the other hand, a DEM win would set up repub howling from the treetops like the monkeys they really are.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
27 Jan 21

@dood111 said
The pre-election claims of fraud were 100% correct because that's what the dems did.
And Irregardless isn't a word. It's REGARDLESS .
That's fake news. Irregardless is a word.

A correct fraud claim has evidence that goes beyond blurry videos and hearsay testimony. We can only find 10 dead people who voted among over 100 million, and some of them clearly voted for MAGA. It seems the claims then change to voting software and purchased votes and what not. Not sure how many ballots are in your videos or if they're ballots at all or of they're legal or not. I think you were fed a big lie ever since Ted Cruz beat Trump in the Iowa caucus (still haven't seen any evidence that Ted Cruz fraudulently stole that rigged caucus either).

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89746
Clock
27 Jan 21

@dood111 said
Trump didn't try to usurp anything, he gave a speech and told his constituents about how the democrats stuffed ballot boxes to steal the election.
NO WAY Biden got over 80 million votes when he couldn't draw a crowd of 20 people while Trump was filling stadiums of 30 thousand supporters.
Spreading misinformation again?

Oh, the smell of a rightious banning is in the air.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54537
Clock
27 Jan 21

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
If through voter suppression and such, if it were repubs in charge forever you would be dancing in the streets. Then ultrarightwingnuts like you will have a ball building the wall and Mexico pays for it and kicking out everyone with brown or black skin.
That would suit you just fine.

On the other hand, a DEM win would set up repub howling from the treetops like the monkeys they really are.
You are quite incorrect. I believe in a two party system, and I believe in having discussions to arrive at the best course of action. If I am against anyone coming over the border, I would hope to convince you that at least each should be vetted, and have their temperature taken> Also, that they not be criminals. Hell,, this was done at Ellis Island.
So you have said let them in. After our discussion,, you would say, yes Average Joe, you have a point,, I guess we should do that. I just love people and want everyone to come here, but vetting is a good idea. We will meet in the middle.
You would say I am glad we had this conversation, or we would have bad people in our country. I would say that it is nice for us all to have discussions......If you, Sonhouse, could make decisions without such discussions, you would have let them in the country, unvetted.
I want extreme vetting, but you may say let it not be too extreme. I would say OK. Glad we had this discussion.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.