27 Jan 21
@kevcvs57 saidTrump didn't try to usurp anything, he gave a speech and told his constituents about how the democrats stuffed ballot boxes to steal the election.
Do you mean the electoral college that your despot boss tried to usurp?
NO WAY Biden got over 80 million votes when he couldn't draw a crowd of 20 people while Trump was filling stadiums of 30 thousand supporters.
27 Jan 21
@dood111 saidPerhaps you were banned for stupidly or dishonesty. He ordered Pence to throw out the electors that gave Biden the swing states and the White House and when that didn’t work he sent the mob in to hang Pence. Watch a video now and again will yer.
Trump didn't try to usurp anything, he gave a speech and told his constituents about how the democrats stuffed ballot boxes to steal the election.
NO WAY Biden got over 80 million votes when he couldn't draw a crowd of 20 people while Trump was filling stadiums of 30 thousand supporters.
27 Jan 21
@dood111 saidHe didn't explain how at all. He just asserted it was happening. How is still a complete mystery.
Trump didn't try to usurp anything, he gave a speech and told his constituents about how the democrats stuffed ballot boxes to steal the election.
NO WAY Biden got over 80 million votes when he couldn't draw a crowd of 20 people while Trump was filling stadiums of 30 thousand supporters.
27 Jan 21
@averagejoe1 saidIt *is* a good idea though, if you are a Ruling Democrat.
For you of liberal persuasions, you see happening here what would happen in a world with no Electoral College, and no Filibuster. It all leads to one boss, one-party rule. If you think this through, it is probably not a good idea.
They're like Royalty, they never give up the throne. and the game is all about POWER, not fairness to all.
27 Jan 21
@earl-of-trumps saidThey have no persuadable reason to disband the Elec College, or the Filibuster, or they would have said it by now in this thread.
It *is* a good idea though, if you are a Ruling Democrat.
They're like Royalty, they never give up the throne. and the game is all about POWER, not fairness to all.
\
Last Chance....Why disband them, which sets up mob rule? The little cowboys in Wyoming will have zero voice. Tell us that the cowboy in WY should have no voice.
27 Jan 21
@averagejoe1 saidYou really want to try to interpret the spambot? 🤔
Would some one please de-cypher the above? Who is 'Your' and who is 'boss'?
yikes.
@wildgrass saidThe videos of people hauling and losing ballots left and right, the lack of provenance or whatever, looks a bit bad to me. Must be my upbringing .
He didn't explain how at all. He just asserted it was happening. How is still a complete mystery.
Would one of you libs PLEASE explain how democrats want people to walk in off the street and vote without any ID? How does that make sense? If Suzianne is running for class president, and a poster here does not like her ideas, that poster can get his friends from over at Rydell High to come over to the school at lunch hour and vote for her opposition.
' WHY wont one of you comment on this logic? Can anyone say why that should not happen at Suzianne's school, but that it is OK to do that in important elections?
Anyone??
@averagejoe1 saidBut the claims of fraud preceded the videos. "This is going to be a fraud like you've never seen." He essentially told us he was going to claim fraud irregardless of evidence if he lost. On what basis was he claiming Dems were stuffing ballot boxes before the election took place? One would think if this rhetoric were on the up-and-up they would have taken some concrete actions at that time to monitor it and/or petition for changes to election in court?
The videos of people hauling and losing ballots left and right, the lack of provenance or whatever, looks a bit bad to me. Must be my upbringing .
Would one of you libs PLEASE explain how democrats want people to walk in off the street and vote without any ID? How does that make sense? If Suzianne is running for class president, and a poster here does not like her ...[text shortened]... nne's school, but that it is OK to do that in important elections?
Anyone??
The videos you are describing may look bad but represent very small numbers of ballots in the grand scheme of things. Even if true, it's not enough to prove claims of stolen elections. Do you know whose name was checked on those ballots?
27 Jan 21
@wildgrass saidThe pre-election claims of fraud were 100% correct because that's what the dems did.
But the claims of fraud preceded the videos. "This is going to be a fraud like you've never seen." He essentially told us he was going to claim fraud irregardless of evidence if he lost. O
And Irregardless isn't a word. It's REGARDLESS .
27 Jan 21
@AverageJoe1
If through voter suppression and such, if it were repubs in charge forever you would be dancing in the streets. Then ultrarightwingnuts like you will have a ball building the wall and Mexico pays for it and kicking out everyone with brown or black skin.
That would suit you just fine.
On the other hand, a DEM win would set up repub howling from the treetops like the monkeys they really are.
27 Jan 21
@dood111 saidThat's fake news. Irregardless is a word.
The pre-election claims of fraud were 100% correct because that's what the dems did.
And Irregardless isn't a word. It's REGARDLESS .
A correct fraud claim has evidence that goes beyond blurry videos and hearsay testimony. We can only find 10 dead people who voted among over 100 million, and some of them clearly voted for MAGA. It seems the claims then change to voting software and purchased votes and what not. Not sure how many ballots are in your videos or if they're ballots at all or of they're legal or not. I think you were fed a big lie ever since Ted Cruz beat Trump in the Iowa caucus (still haven't seen any evidence that Ted Cruz fraudulently stole that rigged caucus either).
27 Jan 21
@dood111 saidSpreading misinformation again?
Trump didn't try to usurp anything, he gave a speech and told his constituents about how the democrats stuffed ballot boxes to steal the election.
NO WAY Biden got over 80 million votes when he couldn't draw a crowd of 20 people while Trump was filling stadiums of 30 thousand supporters.
Oh, the smell of a rightious banning is in the air.
27 Jan 21
@sonhouse saidYou are quite incorrect. I believe in a two party system, and I believe in having discussions to arrive at the best course of action. If I am against anyone coming over the border, I would hope to convince you that at least each should be vetted, and have their temperature taken> Also, that they not be criminals. Hell,, this was done at Ellis Island.
@AverageJoe1
If through voter suppression and such, if it were repubs in charge forever you would be dancing in the streets. Then ultrarightwingnuts like you will have a ball building the wall and Mexico pays for it and kicking out everyone with brown or black skin.
That would suit you just fine.
On the other hand, a DEM win would set up repub howling from the treetops like the monkeys they really are.
So you have said let them in. After our discussion,, you would say, yes Average Joe, you have a point,, I guess we should do that. I just love people and want everyone to come here, but vetting is a good idea. We will meet in the middle.
You would say I am glad we had this conversation, or we would have bad people in our country. I would say that it is nice for us all to have discussions......If you, Sonhouse, could make decisions without such discussions, you would have let them in the country, unvetted.
I want extreme vetting, but you may say let it not be too extreme. I would say OK. Glad we had this discussion.