Go back
Paying people what they are worth

Paying people what they are worth

Debates

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Paying people what they are worth
How is it possible to know what a person's job is worth?

If you ask him, then he would answer: "Better than I have!"
If you ask his employer, then he would answer: "He already has more than he's worth!"

So, how can you know his value, in order to give him a fair salary?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
how can you know his value, in order to give him a fair salary?
Well that is, in essence, the question that the OP raises.

What is your answer?

In the case of the train driver, we "can you know his value" when he refuses to work for what he says is low pay. Commerce grinds to a semi-halt, billions are lost. It seems pretty clear that the strike establishes that the train drivers are worth more than they are getting.

Clock
4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Is the supply of drivers with 10-20 years' experience endless?
The better question is, is this experience crucial? My guess is no.

I would like to go a step further about high paying positions like that of a lawyer and/or doctor. Considering the level of dependence that the wealthy has upon them, they are paid the same peanuts that the drivers are paid.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
The better question is, is this experience crucial?
Perhaps you think not. But I am inclined to think that, in the real world, safety is the highest priority on a mass rapid transit system.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Perhaps the workers themselves do, by striking - and in doing so demonstrating how vital they are to everybody else's prosperity.
but they're always going to overestimate their own worth.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Well that is, in essence, the question that the OP raises.

What is your answer?

In the case of the train driver, we "can you know his value" when he refuses to work for what he says is low pay. Commerce grinds to a semi-halt, billions are lost. It seems pretty clear that the strike establishes that the train drivers are worth more than they are getting.
That's right, therefore I gave you the right answer: It's plain impossible.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zort Boy
The problem is, who determines a worker's worth?
Supply and demand, ultimately.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
The better question is, is this experience crucial? My guess is no.

I would like to go a step further about high paying positions like that of a lawyer and/or doctor. Considering the level of dependence that the wealthy has upon them, they are paid the same peanuts that the drivers are paid.
I wouldn't put lawyer generally in the class of "high paid" like a physician.

While some lawyers make very high salaries (200K+). The majority make much less.

http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Attorney_/_Lawyer/Salary

Compare that to a physician.

http://www.payscale.com/research/US/People_with_Jobs_as_Physicians_/_Doctors/Salary

Lawyers get too much credit for income.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Perhaps the workers themselves do, by striking - and in doing so demonstrating how vital they are to everybody else's prosperity.
In many instances strikers could easily be replaced if only the governing body of the day were willing to permit it. I well remember the occasion, back in the 80s, when President Reagan successfully replaced a large number of recalcitrant air traffic controllers overnight and thus prervented them holding the nation to ransom.
Many inveterate strikers like the miners, dockworkers, printworkers, and carworkers have ended up striking themselves and their colleagues out a job altogether. In the case of postal delivery workers it is hard to imagine a more simple and less demanding task; the only qualifications needed being able to read and walk so they could be more easily replaced than most.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
So are you, broadly speaking, inclined towards seeing the role of government as protecting employers from their employees, or protecting employees from their employers?
Protecting both to the extent deemed necessary; protecting neither to an extent greater than necessary.

Of course, you can play with the definition of necessary; but that is broadly speaking.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Extortion is the best way to get a raise.

GRANNY.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by smw6869
Extortion is the best way to get a raise.

GRANNY.
It's also the best way to get yourself fired when things calm down and you're no longer indispensable.

Charge a drowning man an exorbitant fee for a lifeboat and he'll pay anything for it. But he'll remember too...

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

As a government employee, I am offended by the tone of this thread. Lets keep away from any discussion of employee's worth.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by badmoon
As a government employee, I am offended by the tone of this thread. Lets keep away from any discussion of employee's worth.
The worth of the employee or the worth of the employee's work?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by telerion
The worth of the employee or the worth of the employee's work?
As a government employee, I am offended by difficult questions.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.