27 Nov 21
@dood111 saidWell when it turns out that she did nothing wrong she can sue the authorities can’t she, are you trying to rob this Snow White of a pay day?
My problem is the vicious vindictive way they want to persecute a woman who did nothing wrong.
The family of Arbery said they want to see her in prison? Because she knew the McMichael family and recused herself?
WTF?
@mchill saidANSWER THE QUESTION.
You don't have a clue how the system works, do you?
She recused herself because she knew them personally.
She HAD to do that as a matter of law.
The asst DA had them arrested tried and convicted.
WHAT did she do wrong?
Last I heard, that is the way the system is supposed to work.
27 Nov 21
@dood111 saidIs it cos she is black?
Answer my question:
Why did Kamala Harris get to walk on keeping an innocent man in prison when she knew he was innocent and had to be forced to release the evidence that exonerated him?
Now you all think she is some kind of savior that can do no wrong?
27 Nov 21
@sonhouse saidANSWER THE QUESTION.
@Dood111
NOW we are down to the bottom line for DOO DOO.
She recused herself because she knew them personally.
She HAD to do that as a matter of law.
The asst DA had them arrested tried and convicted.
WHAT did she do wrong?
Last I heard, that is the way the system is supposed to work.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@dood111 saidWrong again, DOO, Do you read that she EVER BROUGHT CHARGES?
Because she didn't instantly bring charges against the McMichaels...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/she-spend-time-prison-former-000000762.html
DOO, Do you read?....She NEVER BROUGHT CHARGES, The GBI did.
What the hell does Kamala Harris have to do with this~!!!!!???
What;s wrong with you people?
@jimm619 saidJebus....yes, she never brought charges.
Wrong again, DOO, Do you read that she EVER BROUGHT CHARGES?
DOO, Do you read?....She NEVER BROUGHT CHARGES, The GBI did.
What the hell does Kamala Harris have to do with this~!!!!!???
What;s wrong with you people?
Because she KNEW the McMichael family.
So she recused herself and turned it over to a Deputy DA that did.
SHE WAS REQUIRED TO UNDER THE LAW .
As far as what Kamala Harris has to do with it, she was brought up as an example of what a black DA can do and get away with, keeping an innocent man on death row when she had evidence he was innocent, versus a white DA who did everything she did to protect the rights of someone and recusing herself.
Man you people are twisted with hate.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
27 Nov 21
Because she didn't instantly bring charges against the McMichaels..
DOO, Do this look familiar?
Instantly means 'at once'..As I paiently, pointed out, SHE NEVER DID!
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/instantly
Posted a link for you. .....DOO, Do the same for us
27 Nov 21
@dood111 saidNot quite.
Because she didn't instantly bring charges against the McMichaels...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/she-spend-time-prison-former-000000762.html
She directed several police officers not to arrest the suspects in the murder on February 23, 2020.
Then after she decided to recuse herself, she recommended to the Georgia Attorney General's office that they appoint in her place Waycross Judicial Circuit District Attorney George E. Barnhill, who she already discussed the case with, knew that Barnhill would not file charges and as a topper, " Barnhill’s son had worked in Johnson’s office with Gregory McMichael."
It was the Georgia Attorney General, not one of Johnson's subordinates, who eventually filed the charges against Arbery's killers.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
27 Nov 21
@no1marauder saidMarauder is correct....as is usual
Not quite.
She directed several police officers not to arrest the suspects in the murder on February 23, 2020.
Then after she decided to recuse herself, she recommended to the Georgia Attorney General's office that they appoint in her place Waycross Judicial Circuit District Attorney George E. Barnhill, who she already discussed the case with, knew that Barnhill wou ...[text shortened]... neral, not one of Johnson's subordinates, who eventually filed the charges against Arbery's killers.
DOO, Do Read up on things before you post.....get facts.
Fact means true...
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fact
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
27 Nov 21
@no1marauder saidnow tell us what she did that was illegal?
Not quite.
She directed several police officers not to arrest the suspects in the murder on February 23, 2020.
Then after she decided to recuse herself, she recommended to the Georgia Attorney General's office that they appoint in her place Waycross Judicial Circuit District Attorney George E. Barnhill, who she already discussed the case with, knew that Barnhill wou ...[text shortened]... neral, not one of Johnson's subordinates, who eventually filed the charges against Arbery's killers.
@mott-the-hoople saidThe indictment is online; she's charged with two felonies based on the facts I outlined above.
now tell us what she did that was illegal?