@shavixmir saidThey don’t think that he’s lying his face off again it’s only the trump base that think it, and then only because they want to.
Just because Americans think something, doesn’t make it so.
And I question your numbers at first glance.
And no, I am not reading your links.
Election deniers got rejected in every swing / battleground state so you have to wonder where the 70% were during the midterms.
@kevcvs57 said"Election deniers got rejected in every swing / battleground state "
They don’t think that he’s lying his face off again it’s only the trump base that think it, and then only because they want to.
Election deniers got rejected in every swing / battleground state so you have to wonder where the 70% were during the midterms.
Then how did the democrats lose the house to the republicans?
@jj-adams saidWhen a bunch of Yahoos from Hee Haw country get their heads together and suggest they make a video, then this is what you get.
Poll worker tells voter he can only vote Democrat because he doesn't have enough staff:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbBkEnsFfoQ
Maybe someone should ask Russ to open an accidental comedy forum.
02 Dec 22
@shavixmir saidWe can be sure the links are crap and/or the results of polls are being distorted.
Just because Americans think something, doesn’t make it so.
And I question your numbers at first glance.
And no, I am not reading your links.
For instance, you can take a poll of voters and find three-quarters of them think the snafus in Arizona on election day last month "affected the outcome of the election."
An idiot reading this would interpret it to mean three-quarters of voters believe an election was stolen (i.e. a candidate with less voter support won a race).
Someone with at least two neurons to rub together in his belfry, in contrast, would understand that all one can conclude from the poll is that 75% of voters think the long lines and technical glitches in a few of Arizona's voting precincts were likely to have prevented some folks from voting, thereby changing the final tallies somewhat. I myself would agree with this. People have jobs to get to, and if they show up at a precinct and see a mile-long line of voters wrapped around the building, they might just shrug and skip voting in order to get to work on time.
But there is no evidence that the glitches and hiccups were prevalent or severe enough to have made any difference regarding which candidate ultimately won a race.
@soothfast said"But there is no evidence that the glitches and hiccups were prevalent or severe enough to have made any difference regarding which candidate ultimately won a race."
We can be sure the links are crap and/or the results of polls are being distorted.
For instance, you can take a poll of voters and find three-quarters of them think the snafus in Arizona on election day last month "affected the outcome of the election."
An idiot reading this would interpret it to mean three-quarters of voters believe an election was stolen (i.e. a can ...[text shortened]... or severe enough to have made any difference regarding which candidate ultimately won a race.
There is no evidence it wasn't enough to "affected the outcome of the election."
We can both play this silly game.
03 Dec 22
@metal-brain saidBecause a screw up by the dems in NY state
"Election deniers got rejected in every swing / battleground state "
Then how did the democrats lose the house to the republicans?
When I say swing states I’m talking about the big ticket state level elections for governor and senate seats
In a mid term election the party in opposition invariably wins big in senate and house but because of trump endorsements and election denying they might even lose a senate seat to the dems.
Face reality comrade ,the US electorate is done with the kremlins Manchurian candidate, Putin is isolated, even in his own backyard, and China / Iran have their own domestic 💩 to deal with
@metal-brain saidNo try to understand that because you’re challenging the result that you do not like YOU have to PROVE that it changed the election result.
"But there is no evidence that the glitches and hiccups were prevalent or severe enough to have made any difference regarding which candidate ultimately won a race."
There is no evidence it wasn't enough to "affected the outcome of the election."
We can both play this silly game.
I would suggest that more early voting, more drop boxes and more mail in voting would have avoided these issues but hey I believe in as more democracy not less.
03 Dec 22
@kevcvs57 saidSo it was not "every" as you falsely claimed. Literally over one hundred election deniers won. That is hardly a crushing defeat. Dems lost the house and you clearly are not handling it well. Not that much will change. You just think it will.
Because a screw up by the dems in NY state
When I say swing states I’m talking about the big ticket state level elections for governor and senate seats
In a mid term election the party in opposition invariably wins big in senate and house but because of trump endorsements and election denying they might even lose a senate seat to the dems.
Face reality comrade ,the US el ...[text shortened]... Putin is isolated, even in his own backyard, and China / Iran have their own domestic 💩 to deal with
03 Dec 22
@metal-brain saidYeah idiot every swing and battleground state as I stated as a fact. I never said that the dems held the house did I.
So it was not "every" as you falsely claimed. Literally over one hundred election deniers won. That is hardly a crushing defeat. Dems lost the house and you clearly are not handling it well. Not that much will change. You just think it will.
03 Dec 22
@kevcvs57 saidThe latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 71% of Likely U.S. voters believe it’s likely – including 40% who say it’s Very Likely – that problems with the election in Maricopa County affected the outcome of the Senate election in Arizona.
They don’t think that he’s lying his face off again it’s only the trump base that think it, and then only because they want to.
Election deniers got rejected in every swing / battleground state so you have to wonder where the 70% were during the midterms.
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/most_voters_share_gop_concerns_about_botched_arizona_election
71% dude. That is over 2 to 1
03 Dec 22
@kevcvs57 saidYou said this:
Yeah idiot every swing and battleground state as I stated as a fact. I never said that the dems held the house did I.
"Election deniers got rejected in every swing / battleground state "
You were wrong. You didn't say almost and you didn't say senate. You didn't say except NY. You back peddled and then doubled down on your false statement. You screwed up, not dems in NY.
03 Dec 22
@metal-brain saidHahaha yeah that’s right a rerun off the back of a rasmussenreport 😂
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 71% of Likely U.S. voters believe it’s likely – including 40% who say it’s Very Likely – that problems with the election in Maricopa County affected the outcome of the Senate election in Arizona.
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/most_voters_share_gop_concerns_about_botched_arizona_election
71% dude. That is over 2 to 1
03 Dec 22
@Metal-Brain
Lets suppose you are 100% correct, fraud there. Did it change enough votes to throw the election?