@metal-brain saidDo you reside on the same planet as the rest of us?
Then why the anonymity if they are really protected? There are reasons to argue against giving credibility to an anynomous source.
Why do you think they try to remain annonymous?
28 Sep 19
@shavixmir saidTo avoid people discovering an obvious conflict of interest.
Do you reside on the same planet as the rest of us?
Why do you think they try to remain annonymous?
@metal-brain saidNormally I would explain the use of annonimity in these matters.
To avoid people discovering an obvious conflict of interest.
But I’ve given up on you. It’s pointless.
28 Sep 19
@shavixmir saidIs this a conflict of interest?
Normally I would explain the use of annonimity in these matters.
But I’ve given up on you. It’s pointless.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-24/what-crowdstrike-firm-hired-dnc-has-ties-hillary-clinton-ukrainian-billionaire-and-g
Yep.
28 Sep 19
1 edit
@metal-brain saidThe name may come out later, after the investigation is concluded. The point of guaranteeing anonymity is to prevent the government, specifically Trump or his agents, from causing the whistleblower to 'disappear' before the full testimony is heard and justice served.
So did Hitler and Stalin.
What if the whistleblower turned out to be someone like Frank Terpil? I think we should know his name.
28 Sep 19
@moonbus saidHow would you know he/she disappeared now? You don't know who it is. Lets say hypothetically it is Gina Haspel. Would that make a difference to you? What if it was a good friend of the Biden family? All sorts of conflict of interest is possible in very different ways.
The name may come out later, after the investigation is concluded. The point of guaranteeing anonymity is to prevent the government, specifically Trump or his agents, from causing the whistleblower to 'disappear' before the full testimony is heard and justice served.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/09/gina-haspel-cia-director-confirmation-hearing-torture-sites
28 Sep 19
@metal-brain saidSince you mentioned Hitler and Stalin, it is well to point out that whoever dissented against their regimes, or exposed their incompetence or criminal activities, landed in concentration camps or gulags. That is why witnesses and whistleblowers need protection. That is why brakes on executive power are necessary.
How would you know he/she disappeared now? You don't know who it is. Lets say hypothetically it is Gina Haspel. Would that make a difference to you? What if it was a good friend of the Biden family? All sorts of conflict of interest is possible in very different ways.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/09/gina-haspel-cia-director-confirmation-hearing-torture-sites
Whether there is a conflict of interest is to be established by some sort of oversight committee later, after the evidence has been collected and impartially weighed. At this point in time, the Trump administration is stonewalling on the collecting of evidence. Therefore, it is appropriate to keep the whistleblower's identity secret, especially from the WH staff -- to prevent extra-judicial reprisals.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
28 Sep 19
@no1marauder saidwhy you think you can void the vote of millions of Americans is just stupid! Our system does not operate like that. Dems have harmed themselves considerably. The far left is now in control of the party and that is dangerous.
I'll take his resignation; he's a pitiful figure not deserving execution.
(Shrug) Why you think Pence would be worse than Trump is beyond my comprehension.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
@moonbus saidlets just stop the “whistle blower”BS now. Everyone knows what is going on. There is not any “whistle blower”. This will blow up for dems just like previous attempts.
Since you mentioned Hitler and Stalin, it is well to point out that whoever dissented against their regimes, or exposed their incompetence or criminal activities, landed in concentration camps or gulags. That is why witnesses and whistleblowers need protection. That is why brakes on executive power are necessary.
Whether there is a conflict of interest is to be established ...[text shortened]... histleblower's identity secret, especially from the WH staff -- to prevent extra-judicial reprisals.
28 Sep 19
@mott-the-hoople saidWinning an election does not give one carte blanche to violate the laws of the United States and/or engage in wholescale corruption and misconduct. Nixon won all but one State and DC in 1972 but was forced out for acts that pale next to what Trump has done.
why you think you can void the vote of millions of Americans is just stupid! Our system does not operate like that. Dems have harmed themselves considerably. The far left is now in control of the party and that is dangerous.
28 Sep 19
@Metal-Brain
Suppose YOU were the whistleblower testifying against president Chump.
Wouldn't YOU want to be anonymous considering what he said, we used to treat spies differently back then, I think was the words he used.
28 Sep 19
@mott-the-hoople saidYou must be hitting the QAnon sites again.
lets just stop the “whistle blower”BS now. Everyone knows what is going on. There is not any “whistle blower”. This will blow up for dems just like previous attempts.
Not only is there a whistleblower, but so far everything he said has been substantiated usually by admissions from the White House or Trump's lawyer.
28 Sep 19
@sonhouse saidIt's not quite accurate to call the whistleblower "anonymous". He is required when filing the complaint to give his name and position, so those in the statutory loop know who he/she is.
@Metal-Brain
Suppose YOU were the whistleblower testifying against president Chump.
Wouldn't YOU want to be anonymous considering what he said, we used to treat spies differently back then, I think was the words he used.
28 Sep 19
@sonhouse said"Back then" when he was a draft dodger.
@Metal-Brain
Suppose YOU were the whistleblower testifying against president Chump.
Wouldn't YOU want to be anonymous considering what he said, we used to treat spies differently back then, I think was the words he used.