Go back
Red hot pawn goes down the tubes

Red hot pawn goes down the tubes

Debates

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Well, Russ has put the last nail in the coffin with his dumb idea about losing track of Recs.

The loss of one's permanent record makes the forums a transitory area. Where once was a solid grounding for a person's credibility (or not in the case of No1Defrauder!), now all we have is the shifting sands of a monthly synopsis.

No longer can we look forward to the first person to reach 10,000 recs and watch as they struggle to curry favour and post like a demon.
Already the forums have started to stagnate with fewer postings than ever.

I know there is alot of fawning to Russ within these pages, but can you all agree with me that this idea is a poor one indeed.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
Well, Russ has put the last nail in the coffin with his dumb idea about losing track of Recs.

The loss of one's permanent record makes the forums a transitory area. Where once was a solid grounding for a person's credibility (or not in the case of No1Defrauder!), now all we have is the shifting sands of a monthly synopsis.

No longer can we look forw ...[text shortened]... to Russ within these pages, but can you all agree with me that this idea is a poor one indeed.
What are you talking about? The only thing limited is the amount of recs a sub can give in a month. Nothing else has chenged

Clock

Originally posted by howardgee
Well, Russ has put the last nail in the coffin with his dumb idea about losing track of Recs.

The loss of one's permanent record makes the forums a transitory area. Where once was a solid grounding for a person's credibility (or not in the case of No1Defrauder!), now all we have is the shifting sands of a monthly synopsis.

No longer can we look forw ...[text shortened]... to Russ within these pages, but can you all agree with me that this idea is a poor one indeed.
Complaints from non-subscribers are the same as non-complaints.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Delmer
Complaints from non-subscribers are the same as non-complaints.
Delmer, go get your gun.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
Delmer, go get your gun.
Go Delmer!

My money's on a Delmerian victory.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
Delmer, go get your gun.
Howard, go get your credit card.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by abejnood
Go Delmer!

My money's on a Delmerian victory.
LOL! I'll try not to let you down, Namesake-of-Hats-And-Mountains.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee

The loss of one's permanent record makes the forums a transitory area. Where once was a solid grounding for a person's credibility (or not in the case of No1Defrauder!), now all we have is the shifting sands of a monthly synopsis.
Yes, the capitalist accumulation of recs system has been replaced with a new labourish rec income credit sytem - fortunately I saw this coming and my recs were deposited in a Swiss Bank in the name of an offshore holding company, so I will receive a new rec in interest from my previous rec portfolio every month

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
Well, Russ has put the last nail in the coffin with his dumb idea about losing track of Recs.

The loss of one's permanent record makes the forums a transitory area. Where once was a solid grounding for a person's credibility (or not in the case of No1Defrauder!), now all we have is the shifting sands of a monthly synopsis.

No longer can we look forw ...[text shortened]... to Russ within these pages, but can you all agree with me that this idea is a poor one indeed.
I find it hilarious that one of the least credible persons on this site is complaining about a lack of credibility in the forums.

Anyway, think it is a great idea. And buy a subscription before you criticise a site and it's creator you moocher.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

who cares

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Esoteric
I find it hilarious that one of the least credible persons on this site is complaining about a lack of credibility in the forums.

Anyway, think it is a great idea. And buy a subscription before you criticise a site and it's creator you moocher.
"it's creator you moocher."

what's creator, dip stick?

(Didn't they teach you to use apostrophes down under, mate?)

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

If they had negative recs I might subscribe ... should be able to give AND take.
As it is, it's basicly a circle-jerk for adolescent drama queens

Clock

Originally posted by howardgee
Well, Russ has put the last nail in the coffin with his dumb idea about losing track of Recs.

The loss of one's permanent record makes the forums a transitory area. Where once was a solid grounding for a person's credibility (or not in the case of No1Defrauder!), now all we have is the shifting sands of a monthly synopsis.

No longer can we look forw ...[text shortened]... to Russ within these pages, but can you all agree with me that this idea is a poor one indeed.
I agree. I was quite happy watching my recs climbing away - it was a nice motivation to write longer, more comprehensive arguments. Okay, I'll freely admit that to be a little shallow, but so what? This new system sucks.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
I agree. I was quite happy watching my recs climbing away - it was a nice motivation to write longer, more comprehensive arguments. Okay, I'll freely admit that to be a little shallow, but so what? This new system sucks.
Here is your first rec on the new system. Now quit your crying.😉

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
"it's creator you moocher."

what's creator, dip stick?

(Didn't they teach you to use apostrophes down under, mate?)
I may add/miss an apostrophe here and there, but that doesn’t change the fact that you are a complete ****wit.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.