Go back
Red hot pawn goes down the tubes

Red hot pawn goes down the tubes

Debates

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Esoteric
See that's the thing, you come into a thread, spew your racist hate, dodge and duck any argument contrary to it, start abusing and insulting people because you really have no intellect behind your tripe, then you get on your high horse and start accusing everyone else of doing that exact same thing.
Here's your come into this thread:

I find it hilarious that one of the least credible persons on this site is complaining about a lack of credibility in the forums.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by xs
Here's your come into this thread:

I find it hilarious that one of the least credible persons on this site is complaining about a lack of credibility in the forums.
As I said, I don’t proclaim to not be offensive. And this post was just a continuation of a long and seemingly continuous argument Howard and I have.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Esoteric
As I said, I don’t proclaim to not be offensive. And this post was just a continuation of a long and seemingly continuous argument Howard and I have.
"I don’t proclaim to not be offensive."

If you just admitted you were thick it would end our argument.
😛

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
"I don’t proclaim to not be offensive."

If you just admitted you were thick it would end our argument.
😛
So all i have to do is admit i am thick and this will all be over?

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Esoteric
So all i have to do is admit i am thick and this will all be over?
If you admit to being thick it would serve to mock hadgee's cause, showing yourself to be bigger than he.

On the other hand this would probably only serve to give him additional ammunition and cause to ridicule and offend you further.

Though granted that this would be a high probability response on hadgee's part, it would further underline his purile nature and only add to your stature as an RHP member.

Considering his flaccid style of attack, maybe an admission of thickness, is an appropriate contrast to hadgee's weinerish responses.

My advice, tell him you're thick and proud to boot!

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock

Originally posted by howardgee
Well, Russ has put the last nail in the coffin with his dumb idea about losing track of Recs.

The loss of one's permanent record makes the forums a transitory area. Where once was a solid grounding for a person's credibility (or not in the case of No1Defrauder!), now all we have is the shifting sands of a monthly synopsis.

No longer can we look forw ...[text shortened]... to Russ within these pages, but can you all agree with me that this idea is a poor one indeed.
I can honestly say that not one of the recs I received was for anything with any intrinsic value or merit... this is still the case today.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
Well, Russ has put the last nail in the coffin with his dumb idea about losing track of Recs.

The loss of one's permanent record makes the forums a transitory area. Where once was a solid grounding for a person's credibility (or not in the case of No1Defrauder!), now all we have is the shifting sands of a monthly synopsis.

No longer can we look forw ...[text shortened]... to Russ within these pages, but can you all agree with me that this idea is a poor one indeed.
I disagree.
I think recs are meaningless numbers on a web page. I think Russ was wise to reset them , and change policy reguarding the distribution of them. If recs meant much to anyone, they have a real self esteem problem.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
I can honestly say that not one of the recs I received was for anything with any intrinsic value or merit... this is still the case today.
Nothing you have ever posted has had any "intrinsic value or merit".

(It's just too easy - you line them up, I'll knock them in)

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
Nothing you have ever posted has had any "intrinsic value or merit".

(It's just too easy - you line them up, I'll knock them in)
That was my point exactly, obviously my obtusely subtle obviousness has evaded you.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

You still let Howardgee post? It has gone down the tubes indeed. I'd figured atleast that would be fixed by now.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Esoteric
I thought you were ignoring me Odour?

Besides buddy o' pal, I remember quite a few of your posts being removed. And before you whine and complain about moderators being biased, they were removed because they were quite offensive.

Oh, and by the way, you haven’t seen me at my offensive best. I mean, a running sore? C'mon, you sound like one of the Wiggles.
I certainly am ignoring the ignorant rubbish you post from down there, but do not intend to let you get away with the sort of personal abuse which emanates from your low-grade filthy mind and pollutes this forum.
I do not doubt you are capable of a lot more of the same moronic stuff; indeed it's about all you are capable of.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Delmer
Complaints from non-subscribers are the same as non-complaints.
I believe thats worth one of those 10 "precious" reqs.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

ok I am new member and not much of a player ,,maybe some day,, what is all this about the recs,is it like the punture marks on voting cards please explain to a nieve irishman

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.