Originally posted by WoodPushShe's an idiot. How does she not understand the question he asked five times very clearly?
So why are we rehashing Johnson's misunderstood use of hyperbole? I assume its because of some of his more recent political action. Which is it?
Unhappy that he's trying to protect citizens from DOD abuse?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeyQ1Xm4Kt0&NR=1
Maybe his recent stance in the budget debates?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Rd3o9H7CNw
Originally posted by Zapp BranniganThat he made the request two weeks prior and came to the hearing unprepared to address it is at minimum negligent.
She understood the question, said she didn't know, he kept asking it over and over.
She isn't the idiot, he is.
I'm starting to wonder about you.
Originally posted by utherpendragonReminds me of another Black liberal who asserted that the slave trade caused sharks to alter their feeding habits, to following slave ships.
Hilarious stupidity coming from Georgia. The same state that gave us Cynthia Mckinney!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNZczIgVXjg
Keep on! Keep on electing them liberals folks! 🙄
Originally posted by WoodPushHe certainly hasn't forgotten the time honored tradition of Congressmen wasting taxpayer money. Perhaps his next question will be regarding how many leprechauns can dance on the head of a pin. Perhaps he can take an hour to formulate that question to Ben Bernanke.
Of course he didn't. It was hyperbole. But for the opposition, or those that want a good laugh, they'll of course take it literally.
If Hank Johnson is stupid, the evidence is that he never learned to apply the rule that politicians should never try to be anything other than dull, literal, bores.
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperThe Jerk Johnson can't ask a simple coherent question. He's giving speeches, incoherent ones, with a vaguely constructed question near the end. She gave concise answers to them to the extent that she could.
She's an idiot. How does she not understand the question he asked five times very clearly?
It is always difficult to reply to moronic non specific questions.
Originally posted by normbenignTwo or three million black slaves died on slave ships and were presumably dumped in the sea. Two or three million corpses tossed into the waters in certain areas of the ocean, along certain coasts and in the approach to certain ports, would have no effect whatsoever on the feeding habits of sharks? One wonders what your point is. What is "liberal" about the point that the "Black" person made?
Reminds me of another Black liberal who asserted that the slave trade caused sharks to alter their feeding habits, to following slave ships.