19 Nov 21
@no1marauder saidIn fact it WAS seriously argued!
The coroner said he fired the "kill shot" into Rosenbaum's back at a downward angle.
One can "seriously argue" that isn't self-defense.
And the argument was lost! Seriously!
@liljo saidHe got you there, Marauder. Its OK, I lost one a year ago myself.
In fact it WAS seriously argued!
And the argument was lost! Seriously!
Ill do the thumb up
@suzianne saidLOL "loaded with hollow point bullets with FMJ"
Bull. He murdered two and brutally assaulted another.
And it wasn't a gun fight until he showed up with an illegal high-powered weapon, loaded with hollow-point bullets with FMJ.
He was there to kill people. Mission accomplished. Now he needs to pay the price to society for his reckless behavior.
Bullets are one or the other, not both.
Also there was nothing about his weapon that was illegal, and the .223 is hardly a "high powered" weapon. It is a varmint cartridge.
His assailants had weapons and were trying to murder him.
@dood111 saidThanks, Another fact. Dood and Sleepy will prevail here, and put this matter to rest. Suzianne, start anew, open up a thread on calling Critical Race Theory a theory. Is it a 'theory'? Teaching children theory is a bit of a stretch, how about a case for teaching fact? Or is it not a fact?
LOL "loaded with hollow point bullets with FMJ"
Bullets are one or the other, not both.
Also there was nothing about his weapon that was illegal, and the .223 is hardly a "high powered" weapon. It is a varmint cartridge.
His assailants had weapons and were trying to murder him.
@averagejoe1 saidTaking children to Sunday school ?
Thanks, Another fact. Dood and Sleepy will prevail here, and put this matter to rest. Suzianne, start anew, open up a thread on calling Critical Race Theory a theory. Is it a 'theory'? Teaching children theory is a bit of a stretch, how about a case for teaching fact? Or is it not a fact?
You mean that kind of fact ? 😉
@averagejoe1 saidHe may just as easily face civil suits from the family of the people he shot.
The Sandman guy won about $250,000,00 from CNN. The guy the Indians harassed on the capitol steps with tomtoms and smoke signals.
Rittenhouse will never have to work or march in parades!,
Especially if he wins a handout.
@mghrn55 saidWithout any money, no lawyer would take the case. Kyle is broke so it would be pointless.
He may just as easily face civil suits from the family of the people he shot.
Especially if he wins a handout.
If he wins a big handout, that'd be even more reason not to take the case, since it's more proof that he was justified.
This isn't like the OJ civil trial.
@mghrn55 saidMG compares religion to CRT.
Taking children to Sunday school ?
You mean that kind of fact ? 😉
Religious teachings use the word faith, and believe, a lot. So, it would follow that it is not taught as fact, would it not?
So, the question remains, why do libs want to teach race relations and race history to our children, which may indeed be fact, or maybe lies,, or whatever .....but refer to it as 'theory'?
Did you miss the question?
@mghrn55 saidAbsolutely, ,no question. Remember footballer Ray Lewis pretty much was involved in an Atlanta knifing murder. He got off. Then paid a lot to family of the victim when he was sued in civil court.
He may just as easily face civil suits from the family of the people he shot.
Especially if he wins a handout.
@averagejoe1 said.............Don't quit the day job......
The Sandman guy won about $250,000,00 from CNN. The guy the Indians harassed on the capitol steps with tomtoms and smoke signals.
Rittenhouse will never have to work or march in parades!,
There will be, doubtless, multi-wrongful
death civil lawsuits. A civil lawsuit has a much lower bar---
''A preponderance of evidence'' as opposed to
reasonable doubt.''---than does a criminal trial.
@dood111 saidWrong again: https://denver.cbslocal.com/2021/11/19/denver-attorney-files-civil-action-in-kyle-rittenhouse-shooting/
Without any money, no lawyer would take the case. Kyle is broke so it would be pointless.
If he wins a big handout, that'd be even more reason not to take the case, since it's more proof that he was justified.
This isn't like the OJ civil trial.
@no1marauder saidLawyer is just looking to get some publicity, Kyle has no money, what does he think he's going to get?
Wrong again: https://denver.cbslocal.com/2021/11/19/denver-attorney-files-civil-action-in-kyle-rittenhouse-shooting/
Typical lawyer, scummy ambulance chaser.
@Mott-The-Hoople
One ukfay'd set of logic, murder two people to stop murder. What drugs do you take? Tell me so I will never take them.
@dood111 saidA judgment can be enforced for twenty years (you have to renew it after 10 years).
Without any money, no lawyer would take the case. Kyle is broke so it would be pointless.
If he wins a big handout, that'd be even more reason not to take the case, since it's more proof that he was justified.
This isn't like the OJ civil trial.
Plenty of time for Rittenhouse to make money.