Go back
Rittenhouse lining up a case for defamation.

Rittenhouse lining up a case for defamation.

Debates

Clock

@no1marauder said
The coroner said he fired the "kill shot" into Rosenbaum's back at a downward angle.

One can "seriously argue" that isn't self-defense.
In fact it WAS seriously argued!

And the argument was lost! Seriously!

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@liljo said
In fact it WAS seriously argued!

And the argument was lost! Seriously!
He got you there, Marauder. Its OK, I lost one a year ago myself.
Ill do the thumb up

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
Bull. He murdered two and brutally assaulted another.

And it wasn't a gun fight until he showed up with an illegal high-powered weapon, loaded with hollow-point bullets with FMJ.

He was there to kill people. Mission accomplished. Now he needs to pay the price to society for his reckless behavior.
LOL "loaded with hollow point bullets with FMJ"
Bullets are one or the other, not both.
Also there was nothing about his weapon that was illegal, and the .223 is hardly a "high powered" weapon. It is a varmint cartridge.
His assailants had weapons and were trying to murder him.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
LOL "loaded with hollow point bullets with FMJ"
Bullets are one or the other, not both.
Also there was nothing about his weapon that was illegal, and the .223 is hardly a "high powered" weapon. It is a varmint cartridge.
His assailants had weapons and were trying to murder him.
Thanks, Another fact. Dood and Sleepy will prevail here, and put this matter to rest. Suzianne, start anew, open up a thread on calling Critical Race Theory a theory. Is it a 'theory'? Teaching children theory is a bit of a stretch, how about a case for teaching fact? Or is it not a fact?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Thanks, Another fact. Dood and Sleepy will prevail here, and put this matter to rest. Suzianne, start anew, open up a thread on calling Critical Race Theory a theory. Is it a 'theory'? Teaching children theory is a bit of a stretch, how about a case for teaching fact? Or is it not a fact?
Taking children to Sunday school ?
You mean that kind of fact ? 😉

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
The Sandman guy won about $250,000,00 from CNN. The guy the Indians harassed on the capitol steps with tomtoms and smoke signals.
Rittenhouse will never have to work or march in parades!,
He may just as easily face civil suits from the family of the people he shot.
Especially if he wins a handout.

Clock
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mghrn55 said
He may just as easily face civil suits from the family of the people he shot.
Especially if he wins a handout.
Without any money, no lawyer would take the case. Kyle is broke so it would be pointless.
If he wins a big handout, that'd be even more reason not to take the case, since it's more proof that he was justified.
This isn't like the OJ civil trial.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mghrn55 said
Taking children to Sunday school ?
You mean that kind of fact ? 😉
MG compares religion to CRT.
Religious teachings use the word faith, and believe, a lot. So, it would follow that it is not taught as fact, would it not?
So, the question remains, why do libs want to teach race relations and race history to our children, which may indeed be fact, or maybe lies,, or whatever .....but refer to it as 'theory'?
Did you miss the question?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mghrn55 said
He may just as easily face civil suits from the family of the people he shot.
Especially if he wins a handout.
Absolutely, ,no question. Remember footballer Ray Lewis pretty much was involved in an Atlanta knifing murder. He got off. Then paid a lot to family of the victim when he was sued in civil court.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
The Sandman guy won about $250,000,00 from CNN. The guy the Indians harassed on the capitol steps with tomtoms and smoke signals.
Rittenhouse will never have to work or march in parades!,
.............Don't quit the day job......
There will be, doubtless, multi-wrongful
death civil lawsuits. A civil lawsuit has a much lower bar---
''A preponderance of evidence'' as opposed to
reasonable doubt.''---than does a criminal trial.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
Without any money, no lawyer would take the case. Kyle is broke so it would be pointless.
If he wins a big handout, that'd be even more reason not to take the case, since it's more proof that he was justified.
This isn't like the OJ civil trial.
Wrong again: https://denver.cbslocal.com/2021/11/19/denver-attorney-files-civil-action-in-kyle-rittenhouse-shooting/

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
Wrong again: https://denver.cbslocal.com/2021/11/19/denver-attorney-files-civil-action-in-kyle-rittenhouse-shooting/
Lawyer is just looking to get some publicity, Kyle has no money, what does he think he's going to get?
Typical lawyer, scummy ambulance chaser.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Mott-The-Hoople
One ukfay'd set of logic, murder two people to stop murder. What drugs do you take? Tell me so I will never take them.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@jimm619
Was there video of the incidents? The mom of one of the victims said cops didn't even stop him when he shot. Is that true? There is more going on here than meets the eye.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
Without any money, no lawyer would take the case. Kyle is broke so it would be pointless.
If he wins a big handout, that'd be even more reason not to take the case, since it's more proof that he was justified.
This isn't like the OJ civil trial.
A judgment can be enforced for twenty years (you have to renew it after 10 years).

Plenty of time for Rittenhouse to make money.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.