Go back
Running against a Strong Economy

Running against a Strong Economy

Debates

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54607
Clock
08 Feb 20

@no1marauder said
That was one poll; aggregates of polls still have him at negative approval:

Real Clear Politics: -6.3% https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

538: -7.9%
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

At this point in his Presidency, Trump has the highest level of disapproval of any President since mod ...[text shortened]... during Truman's term; no incumbent has ever been above 50% disapproval at this point but the Donald.
Makes one wonder. After all He”s Done?

Won’t bore you with the list, but Polls are always wrong, Hillary winning being at the top of the list. So much for polls. Might as well talk time travel.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
08 Feb 20

@averagejoe1 said
Makes one wonder. After all He”s Done?

Won’t bore you with the list, but Polls are always wrong, Hillary winning being at the top of the list. So much for polls. Might as well talk time travel.
It's tiresome to constantly repeat it here, but the aggregate of national polls were within about 1% of the popular vote in 2016. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

I wouldn't count on the Donald pulling the equivalent of an inside straight again by losing the total vote by millions but winning by taking a few Midwest States by razor thin margins (all of which went big for Democrats in 2018).

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147487
Clock
08 Feb 20
1 edit

@no1marauder said
It's tiresome to constantly repeat it here, but the aggregate of national polls were within about 1% of the popular vote in 2016. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

I wouldn't count on the Donald pulling the equivalent of an inside straight again by losing the total vote by millions but winning by taking a few Midwest States by razor thin margins (all of which went big for Democrats in 2018).
silver gave clinton an 85% chance of winning...hind sight is 20-20

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
08 Feb 20
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
silver gave clinton an 85% chance of winning...hind sight is 20-20
Actually, his model said 72% in his final pre-election article.

Left wingers were going crazy criticizing him for giving Trump that much of a chance to win.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
08 Feb 20

@no1marauder said
Actually, his model said 72% in his final pre-election article.

Left wingers were going crazy criticizing him for giving Trump that much of a chance to win.
Yeah, but giving Trump better odds than getting tails twice in a row when flipping a coin means that the model actually predicts that Clinton will win for sure... in the warped minds of the statistically illiterate.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
08 Feb 20

Forgot the link: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#plus

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
09 Feb 20

@AverageJoe1

Regarding running against a strong economy, please read this take-down of Trump's SotU address (which was peppered with falsehoods):

https://apnews.com/bc9bdfa1ee87c521ed8cae719929c4fd

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
09 Feb 20

@earl-of-trumps said
Why the hell do libs think the people from all over Latin America are trying to get IN TO the US???
If the US bordered most European countries
Americans would be illegally entering Europe.

And if good ol' USA is so great .... why aren't Canadians illegally crossing?

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
09 Feb 20

@mott-the-hoople said
hind sight is 20-20
No. "hind sight" is spotting a female deer.

Perhaps with hindsight you meant "hindsight"?

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
09 Feb 20
1 edit

@wolfgang59 said
No. "hind sight" is spotting a female deer.

Perhaps with hindsight you meant "hindsight"?
Deers have excellent sight and it can be read in this way.

If some one were as blind as a bat, this would not be written batsight.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
09 Feb 20

@wajoma said
Deers have excellent sight and it can be read in this way.
Human visual acuity is at least twice that of most deer.

But don't let facts get in your way wackoma.

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
09 Feb 20
1 edit

@wolfgang59 said
Human visual acuity is at least twice that of most deer.

But don't let facts get in your way wackoma.
Didn't quantify the hind sight in a comparative way wolfgang. In comparison to critters that virtually can't see, deers have excellent sight, but that was not the point.

wolfgang logic πŸ™„

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107170
Clock
09 Feb 20

@no1marauder said
November is a long time away.

I think Trump should be an underdog to win re-election at this point; he's still unpopular.
The absence of Hillary will make it harder for undecided to vote Trump imho.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
09 Feb 20

@wajoma said
Didn't quantify the hind sight in a comparative way wolfgang. In comparison to critters that virtually can't see, deers have excellent sight, but that was not the point.

wolfgang logic πŸ™„
LOL
Deers have excellent sight compared to the blind?

LOL
You are more stupid than I imagined.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
10 Feb 20

@no1marauder....Amen,. Marauder, hey I don't care what LESS THAN AVERAGE JOE says about you, I think you're alright.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.