26 Jan 08
1 edit
Originally posted by smw6869In another thread - cant remember who he was replying to but someone asked how many hijackings since 9/11 and he asked how many in the 6 years before.
Are you talking to GRANNY? I have no idea what you're talking about. You got the wrong person. Hijackings?
F. GRANNY.
Edit: Thread - Is America winning the war on terror? Replying to a post by Rajk999
Sigh - me's da research monkey ...
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by smw6869Saddam was an evil b@stard, which makes you wonder why the US put him in power in the first place! Every death and evil persecution dropped on the poor people of Iraq falls firmly at the feet of the US. Driving in with a thousand tanks waving the flag of freedom 30 years later does not make the US the good guy! I recon, given the grief it's caused them over the years, most Iraqi's would happily delete all their oil reserves as they have done nothing but cause them grief!
Yeah! I'm sure Sadamn was waterboarded and confessed to a lie. Maybe he was video taped saying this. Ooops, that cetainly would have been faked, like the moon landing.
Sadamn certainly did help to make GW invade, with his cat and mouse game over WMD, He kept inspectors out of certain sites to give GW the impression that Maybe he had WMD. Unfortunately he ...[text shortened]... ze that GW wasn't bull s***ing. Sadamn was equally at fault for this disaster.
F. GRANNY.
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by MarinkatombYeah ... and the African countries are suffering and killing each other because of what the Imperialist powers did 500 years ago.
Saddam was an evil b@stard, which makes you wonder why the US put him in power in the first place! Every death and evil persecution dropped on the poor people of Iraq falls firmly at the feet of the US. Driving in with a thousand tanks waving the flag of freedom 30 years later does not make the US the good guy! I recon, given the grief it's caused them o ...[text shortened]... 's would happily delete all their oil reserves as they have done nothing but cause them grief!
Its always someones elses fault. It takes balls to accept that your destiny is in your own hands and if Saddam stayed in power for 30 years and was a brutal dicatator then the Iraqis were blooming idiots as are much of the African continent.
And thats the politically incorrect truth ... like it or not.
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by MarinkatombIndeed! The US has always been the supporter of evil and the perpetrator of persecution.
Saddam was an evil b@stard, which makes you wonder why the US put him in power in the first place! Every death and evil persecution dropped on the poor people of Iraq falls firmly at the feet of the US. Driving in with a thousand tanks waving the flag of freedom 30 years later does not make the US the good guy! I recon, given the grief it's caused them o ...[text shortened]... 's would happily delete all their oil reserves as they have done nothing but cause them grief!
I will take the liberty of changing only a few words of your post [shown in brackets] to express this fact, with which I am positive you will agree as it fits your paradigm.
“[Stalin] was an evil b@stard, which makes you wonder why the US [saved him from the Nazis and kept him] in power in the first place! Every death and evil persecution dropped on the poor people of [USSR] falls firmly at the feet of the US. Driving in with a [trade sanctions and Star Wars] waving the flag of freedom [44] years later does not make the US the good guy! I recon, given the grief it's caused them over the years, most [Russians] would happily delete all their [nuclear] reserves as they have done nothing but cause them grief!”
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by StTitoAnd north k. doesn't have the equivelent relationship with muslim nutty killers that Saddam did. The relationship between Saddam and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi has never been explained to my satisfaction. We KNOW that Zarqawi met at the hospital run by Saddams kid several times, and that indeed, he had a "we'll do the dirty work - you patch up our fighters" relationship with the regime. We also know that Saddam gave Abu Musab al-Zarqawi most excellent treatment at the same hospital when he was shot all to hell in a gun battle.
Seems to me if you DO have nukes we won't invade. Say like one of those other axis of evil countrys N. Korea. Guess they don't have anything we really want.
It would be interesting to see what would happen should N. Korea join up with muslim terrorists wouldn't it?
So you kind of missed the obvious here. Duh!
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by MarinkatombIt wouldn't hurt you to take your own countrymans side instead of the terrorists side for frickin' once. But I'm not holding my breath. Silly.
Yeh, so conveniently it wasn't the fault of the US finding any old excuse to invade, it was the dead guys fault for tricking them. Why don't don't we go ask Saddam to verify that, oh wait he's dead. Guess we should just take this guys word for it then...
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by StarValleyWyI'm sure they would call themselves SPECTRE and we'd have to send James Bond in.
It would be interesting to see what would happen should N. Korea join up with muslim terrorists wouldn't it?
WHAT THE HOLY CRAP ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT NOW???
God damn boy, get your act together. You sound awfully paranoid for someone on a chess site.
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by invigoratedateline 1996 - Bill Clinton establishes the official US policy of "Regime Change In Iraq" and then attacks Iraq ten times in two years including a raid into downtown Baghdad on the secret police ministry! Sheesh! Are people so stupid as to think that Bush established this US policy? The origination of the policy had very little to do with Bush, except that Clinton used the attack on Bush Senior by Iraqi agents as a pretext for establishing the "Regime Change" policy and declaring war on Iraq. Stupid revisionist. Are you really this lazy or just plain stupid? I'm guessing the latter. svw
Saddam never said he had WMD -
Bush said it knowing he did not - therefore creating a need for war.
The fact Saddam did not have WMD permitted the war to happen.
Bush Rumsfeld et al should face a similar trial to Saddam
President Clinton's decision to attack Iraq has brought him a substantial boost in approval ratings for handling both foreign policy and his overall job as President and has diminished uncertainty over his leadership on the world stage, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll.
The poll found that two-thirds of Americans surveyed supported the weekend air strike on the Iraqi intelligence headquarters in Baghdad, and six out of 10 approved of Mr. Clinton's general dealings with Iraq, more than approved of Mr. Clinton's handling of the crises in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Somalia.
As Mr. Clinton prepares to travel to Tokyo next week for a meeting of the Group of Seven industrial democracies, White House officials seized on the air strike as evidence that the President is sure-footed in international affairs. The Administration sent out its top military officials, most notably Gen. Colin L. Powell, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on a series of television and newspaper interviews in the past two days to praise Mr. Clinton as a tough leader who would not be bullied by the Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein. A 'Lesson' for Iraqi
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by shavixmirHow are the rats in your sewer? Got any more of them pregnant lately?
I'm sure they would call themselves SPECTRE and we'd have to send James Bond in.
WHAT THE HOLY CRAP ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT NOW???
God damn boy, get your act together. You sound awfully paranoid for someone on a chess site.
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by StarValleyWyrec'd.. cheers! 🙂
dateline 1996 - Bill Clinton establishes the official US policy of "Regime Change In Iraq" and then attacks Iraq ten times in two years including a raid into downtown Baghdad on the secret police ministry! Sheesh! Are people so stupid as to think that Bush established this US policy? The origination of the policy had very little to do with Bush, except ...[text shortened]... uld not be bullied by the Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein. A 'Lesson' for Iraqi
[/b]
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by MacSwainThanks Mate! Here is a link to a clinton "regime change" speech.
rec'd.. cheers! 🙂
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/17/transcripts/clinton.iraq/
I don't know how the left does it, but you better hurry and read while you can. Every one of the references to Clinton Iraq Regime Change Policy are slowly disappearing from the internet. How do they do that? It drives me nuts!😀
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by Rajk999Wrong...wrong and wrong. International mining corporations, oil companies and the I.M.F. Check what happened when Bush Snr. called for an uprising at the end of 'Gulf War One'. Now what about answering my question.... how many hijackings were there before 911? If the answer is not zero I would appreciate an answer with a number in it .....thankyou.
Yeah ... and the African countries are suffering and killing each other because of what the Imperialist powers did 500 years ago.
Its always someones elses fault. It takes balls to accept that your destiny is in your own hands and if Saddam stayed in power for 30 years and was a brutal dicatator then the Iraqis were blooming idiots as are much of the African continent.
And thats the politically incorrect truth ... like it or not.
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by chegazDont those same
Wrong...wrong and wrong. International mining corporations, oil companies and the I.M.F. Check what happened when Bush Snr. called for an uprising at the end of 'Gulf War One'. Now what about answering my question.... how many hijackings were there before 911? If the answer is not zero I would appreciate an answer with a number in it .....thankyou.
International mining corporations
oil companies
IMF
operate and influence countries all over the world ? They operate in South America, India, China, Australia, Mid East .... all over the world .... you understand ?
Why is it therefore that fools like you insist on not seeing the root cause of the African problem and see it fit to blame others. I know why ... the truth is painful for some people to accept.
As for hijackings before 9/11 ... are you doubting that the US airport security has virtually eliminated the threat of flying planes into buildings since 9/11 ?
You want a number ? Its #3 ... thats the number of my middle finger.
26 Jan 08
Originally posted by Rajk999Three you say? What airlines, where were they hijacked from and what happened to the hijackers and passengers? And I hope your middle finger gets better.
Dont those same
International mining corporations
oil companies
IMF
operate and influence countries all over the world ? They operate in South America, India, China, Australia, Mid East .... all over the world .... you understand ?
Why is it therefore that fools like you insist on not seeing the root cause of the African problem and see it fit ...[text shortened]... buildings since 9/11 ?
You want a number ? Its #3 ... thats the number of my middle finger.