30 Apr 16
Originally posted by shavixmirIt does. An I have references to back me up and you have the memory of a reference that you seem somewhat sketchy about.
It does not.
If you're going to be mentally ill, it will rear its ugly head before you are 25. If you don't use marijuana until you are 25, then the chances of it triggering said mental illness is next to 0%.
So you do agree that marijuana can trigger mental illness.
That was what the report said.
In contradiction to what you said.
But for Christ's sake stop jibbering on about whatever you are jabbering on about.
I really couldn't care less.
In fact, if I wanted your blatantly obstrusive opinion, I'd rattle a poop bucket.
Then feel free to ignore my posts. It won't make you right.
30 Apr 16
Originally posted by twhiteheadIn answer to your first point:
It does. An I have references to back me up and you have the memory of a reference that you seem somewhat sketchy about.
[b]If you're going to be mentally ill, it will rear its ugly head before you are 25. If you don't use marijuana until you are 25, then the chances of it triggering said mental illness is next to 0%.
So you do agree that marijuan ...[text shortened]... nion, I'd rattle a poop bucket.[/b]
Then feel free to ignore my posts. It won't make you right.[/b]
Only in so far as that masturbation, riding bike and eating cookies can trigger mental illness, yes... Exactly the same odds.
And that before you are 25.
As for the rest, I gotta go and have wine, so I may or may not get back to you on them.
30 Apr 16
Originally posted by shavixmirPlease stop rattling your poop bucket.
In answer to your first point:
Only in so far as that masturbation, riding bike and eating cookies can trigger mental illness, yes... Exactly the same odds.
And what odds are those? And where is your reference that those cause mental illness?
And that before you are 25.
Sure. I never said anything about 'after you are 25'.
As for the rest, I gotta go and have wine, so I may or may not get back to you on them.
Take your poop bucket with you, its stinking up the forums.
30 Apr 16
1 edit
Originally posted by KazetNagorraWritten as a true descendant of the Manor. Long live the Feudal System, whatever the evolutionary form it takes.
As long as you are part of a society you will always have "to pay" when someone in that society is no longer able to aid in the production of goods and services, and you will generally stand to gain if people are aided in (again) becoming productive members of society. If this troubles you, you should become a hermit.
30 Apr 16
Originally posted by EladarCan't you really do any better than these aimless, inane ramblings about "the Manor"? Here's a radical thought: try formulating an objection to what I said that actually pertains to it.
Written as a true descendant of the Manor. Long live the Feudal System, whatever the evolutionary form it takes.
30 Apr 16
Originally posted by KazetNagorraBeing a libtard brought up in the system, I'm sure it is impossible for you to see the truth of what I'm saying.
Can't you really do any better than these aimless, inane ramblings about "the Manor"? Here's a radical thought: try formulating an objection to what I said that actually pertains to it.
In other words, I will continue to point out the truth even to people like you who are blind to it.
30 Apr 16
Originally posted by EladarIn other words you are incapable of explaining yourself but wish to hide behind the 'you are too blinded to see the truth' game. Sorry, but nobody buys that nonsensical argument.
Being a libtard brought up in the system, I'm sure it is impossible for you to see the truth of what I'm saying.
In other words, I will continue to point out the truth even to people like you who are blind to it.
30 Apr 16
Originally posted by twhiteheadYes, it is impossible to explain the truth to those who are blind. It is sad but true that in order to have a discussion we must first have a common ground on which to discuss.
In other words you are incapable of explaining yourself but wish to hide behind the 'you are too blinded to see the truth' game. Sorry, but nobody buys that nonsensical argument.
Those who believe that the other side must accept their assumptions as truth accuse others as being unable to explain their position. Because of course one must be able to explain the position based on your assumptions.
30 Apr 16
Originally posted by EladarIf you had a valid argument you wouldn't require anyone to accept your assumptions as truth. It is not true that common ground is required for a discussion, nor is it true that any truth exists that it impossible to explain to others.
Yes, it is impossible to explain the truth to those who are blind. It is sad but true that in order to have a discussion we must first have a common ground on which to discuss.
Those who believe that the other side must accept their assumptions as truth accuse others as being unable to explain their position. Because of course one must be able to explain the position based on your assumptions.
And nobody here is blind.
You are just wrong, and you know you are wrong.
30 Apr 16
Originally posted by twhiteheadWow, you really have no clue.
If you had a valid argument you wouldn't require anyone to accept your assumptions as truth. It is not true that common ground is required for a discussion, nor is it true that any truth exists that it impossible to explain to others.
And nobody here is blind.
You are just wrong, and you know you are wrong.
30 Apr 16
Originally posted by EladarIt's impossible to see the truth of what you're saying because you're not saying anything.
Being a libtard brought up in the system, I'm sure it is impossible for you to see the truth of what I'm saying.
In other words, I will continue to point out the truth even to people like you who are blind to it.