Go back
Shameful response of SCOTUS in Wisconsin

Shameful response of SCOTUS in Wisconsin

Debates

P

Joined
23 Nov 11
Moves
45294
Clock
07 Apr 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wolfgang59 said
That is indeed shocking but it is the State Supreme Court not SCOTUS.
Both the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) weighed in on this decision.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/us/politics/wisconsin-primary-voting-coronavirus.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
07 Apr 20
1 edit

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
07 Apr 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
07 Apr 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@kazetnagorra said
Sounds to me like it's fully stacked with politicians instead of judges.
Oh for eff sake, if they are elected, you don't like it. If they are selected by the governor and approved by the state representatives, you don't like it.
OK you tell us, what would you do to select the justices on the state supreme court?
Draw lots?
(Elections by the people is NOT "stacking", by the way, know a what term means before you use it)

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
07 Apr 20

@dood111 said
Oh for eff sake, if they are elected, you don't like it. If they are selected by the governor and approved by the state representatives, you don't like it.
OK you tell us, what would you do to select the justices on the state supreme court?
Draw lots?
(Elections by the people is NOT "stacking", by the way, know a what term means before you use it)
Judges should be appointed by an independent body to ensure their independence.

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
07 Apr 20

@kazetnagorra said
Judges should be appointed by an independent body to ensure their independence.
Nonsense. If they did that you'd just find fault with that and claim the independent body was biased. It's just the way you are.
Anyway, in Wisconsin they ARE appointed by an independent body. They are appointed by THE PEOPLE .

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147480
Clock
07 Apr 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@shavixmir

Sorry, rushed it. Supreme Court of the STATE of Wisconsin. Still clear politics.
"conservative bastards of the SCOTUS"
LMFAO

you just cant make this shyt up.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147480
Clock
07 Apr 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
What is scotus?

It sounds like half a ball-sack.
if it were up your ass you would know what it is...

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
07 Apr 20

@dood111 said
Nonsense. If they did that you'd just find fault with that and claim the independent body was biased. It's just the way you are.
Anyway, in Wisconsin they ARE appointed by an independent body. They are appointed by THE PEOPLE .
No, I wouldn't.

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
07 Apr 20
1 edit

@kazetnagorra said
No, I wouldn't.
YES YOU WOULD. It's just part of your contrarian nature, it's like a mental disease with you.
Anyway, you don't think THE PEOPLE should be able to select their judges in an election, but you think some kind of"independent body" should?
And independent body selected by who, exactly?
More politicians?

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
07 Apr 20

@dood111 said
YES YOU WOULD. It's just part of your contrarian nature, it's like a mental disease with you.
Anyway, you don't think THE PEOPLE should be able to select their judges in an election, but you think some kind of"independent body" should?
And independent body selected by who, exactly?
More politicians?
They should be appointed by an independent body, like a bar association.

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
07 Apr 20
1 edit

@kazetnagorra said
They should be appointed by an independent body, like a bar association.
Now you're really digging a hole for yourself.
Yeah let's have other judges and lawyers select who's going to be on the supreme court, I'm sure they won't have any graft, corruption, or favoritism among themselves.
Genius thinking.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
07 Apr 20

@dood111 said
Now you're really digging a hole for yourself.
Yeah let's have other judges and lawyers select who's going to be on the supreme court, I'm sure they won't have any graft, corruption, or favoritism among themselves.
Genius thinking.
You do realize this isn't exactly revolutionary and has been successfully implemented in a bunch of places, right?

D

Joined
09 Jan 20
Moves
3568
Clock
07 Apr 20

@kazetnagorra said
You do realize this isn't exactly revolutionary and has been successfully implemented in a bunch of places, right?
No I'm not aware of that why don't you point one out so I can look it up and shoot it down like you do everything else?
How is this superior than direct vote by the people?

m

Joined
07 Feb 09
Moves
151917
Clock
07 Apr 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
YES YOU WOULD. It's just part of your contrarian nature, it's like a mental disease with you.
Anyway, you don't think THE PEOPLE should be able to select their judges in an election, but you think some kind of"independent body" should?
And independent body selected by who, exactly?
More politicians?
Is your caps lock button sticking ? 😛

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.