Originally posted by darvlayClassic!
I will take the con side of this debate. No, he does not rule this forum. He merely inhabits it a few times a week and posts so much nonsense at such a blistering pace that no one can keep up with him and eventually he is left talking to himself for a couple hours.
Rebuttal?
svw does a little dance of joy as the euro whiz bangs and rants in his cell. Snark.
Oh. Sorry. Didn't you know? If you give in to drugs... you are committed to stupidy? Well. That being said.
How you doin' sewer rat? Done anything to benefit "man kind" lately?
errrr... besides your wet dreams of killin' farmers?
Originally posted by shavixmirYep. One does what one must for an intelligent bit of conversation. Have you noticed that you don't dare respond so that I don't HAVE to talk to myself?
You do realise you are talking to yourself again...
SNARK
Raped any kids in the sewers today? BTW... why else do you live there?
It is a generally recognized idiom of psycho-analysis that one identifies himself according to his self image. I live in a pretty valley. You live in a thousand year old sewer. I wonder. Why is that?
Originally posted by sonhouse (in reference to Stang)called well
and you are Johnny one note
Both Stang and SVW attempt to drown the forums. I'm closer to agreement with Stang on the main points, but far more likely to read SVW's drunken rants, which reveal a sophisticated intelligence and a poetic sensibility, however misguided.
Originally posted by WulebgrAnd also reveal far too much spare time.
called well
Both Stang and SVW attempt to drown the forums. I'm closer to agreement with Stang on the main points, but far more likely to read SVW's drunken rants, which reveal a sophisticated intelligence and a poetic sensibility, however misguided.
Originally posted by AmauroteI agree with Amaurote. SVW is sort of an acquired taste, like horehound candy.
I must confess to enjoying StarValley's posts: they are profoundly froward, of course, and when I first browsed the forums I found them incredibly arrogant and hostile, but as vituperative and provocative as his political threads can be at times, he is certainly worth reading.