@shavixmir saidNo need to apologise shag doody for brains, I've long advised you, the single ijit emoji is your safest response, better to say nothing and be thought a fool, than try to justify your appeasement to the muslim censors.
π₯±
Sorry. You bore me.
22 Jul 23
@wajoma saidAppeasement to the muslim censors?
No need to apologise shag doody for brains, I've long advised you, the single ijit emoji is your safest response, better to say nothing and be thought a fool, than try to justify your appeasement to the muslim censors.
Not only are you as thick as shyte, but you have obviously not the foggiest idea of my views on these issues.
So, go back to your rimming of koalas, and leave discussions to the adults.
22 Jul 23
@shavixmir saidThe Pseud Known as Shag Doody for Brains said:
Appeasement to the muslim censors?
"Why the Swedish government would allow it, is beyond me."
Appeasement to the muslim censors.
22 Jul 23
@wajoma saidThey allowed it numb skull, so they’re not apppeasing anyone.
The Pseud Known as Shag Doody for Brains said:
"Why the Swedish government would allow it, is beyond me."
Appeasement to the muslim censors.
Jesus, where you dropped on your head and skull-fukked by a kangaroo when you were little, or something?
@shavixmir saidNot talking about the swedish goobermint, we're talking about your statement. First there was the double down, then the equivocation and now the squirming denial.
They allowed it numb skull, so they’re not apppeasing anyone.
Jesus, where you dropped on your head and skull-fukked by a kangaroo when you were little, or something?
Single ijit emoji, take my advice, single ijit emoji, take my advice...
22 Jul 23
@wajoma saidYou have no idea what you’re on about.
Not talking about the swedish goobermint, we're talking about your statement. First there was the double down, then the equivocation and now the squirming denial.
Single ijit emoji, take my advice, single ijit emoji, take my advice...
Go rape a koala.
@vivify saidThe pot calling the kettle black. π
[youtube]Lwq_O0WnLHY?feature=share[/youtube]
An interesting point: Islamic nations condemn Sweden for the book burning but stay silent on China's human rights abuses of over a million Uighurs. This is likely because China is the largest trading partner of major Muslim nations like Saudi Arabia, Iran and the UAE.
22 Jul 23
@shavixmir saidFreedom lovers (not you shag doody) some inspiring words, "good people, break bad laws." (not you shag doody)
You have no idea what you’re on about.
Go rape a koala.
@shavixmir saidPost 3: Shag doody comes out with a wimpy, wishy, washy, straddle the fence, could go either way, post on freedom of expression. Something about neo nazis (sigh) and anti-hate, when the guy that burnt the koran was an Iraqi national and we don't know what his motivation was, a little hate? a lot of hate? (which flows through many of shag doodys posts here) a joke? But the telling statement form shag doody was his appeasement to the muslim censors with this:
π₯±
"Why the Swedish government would allow it, is beyond me."
Question for shag doody: Suppose Salwan Momika knew of someone that had been harmed in the name of that book, a boyfriend, a family member? Is he allowed to hate that book and those that violate the rights of others in the name of that book? (Don't bother answering I can't stomach your squirming appeasement, remember - only single ijit emojis from you)
Post 9: I push back on shag doodys appeasement and hypocrisy i.e. he's allowed to post hate and comments intended to cause offence (unsuccessful). I push back on shag doodys wimpy, wishy, washy post.
Post 10: I've hooked shag doody, he doubles down on people not having a right to express themselves as they choose. Again he cites 'hatred' but of course there's no proof as to the motivation of the book burner nor that he might have a legitimate reason to hate the book, he does not present a majical scale of hate (mild displeasure to raging seething anger) that measures what is acceptable hate.
Post 11: I point out hate is a legitimate human emotion, and it is definitely a legitimate response to censors and the initiators of threats of force and actual force.
Post 13: shag doody again defends the censors, the religious muslim censors. because without them this whole thing would have blown away like the smoke and ashes of the majic book. He claims the censors are 'educated', making those that love and defend freedom uneducated.
Post 14: We find out who the censors are and who shag doody is aligning himself with, it's not a pretty sight, it's an uncomfortable truth which shag doody cannot handle.
Post 15: shag doody finally takes my advice, a single ijit emoji, good choice, leave it at that shag doody.
Post 16: acknowledgement by my good self that shag doody has made a post worthy of the Pseud Known as Shag Doody for Brains.
Post 17: tPKaSDfB The denial phase begins from mr innocent.
Post 18: Myself - the proof reposted, although shags trajectory is now obvious.
Post 19: The denial grows, he tries to divert to this being about the action/inaction of the Swedish goobermint which has never been the subject.
Post 20: I put shag doody on notice, everyone can see his stupid tricks.
Post 21: shag doody plays dumb (I'm not going to try to get mileage out of that one, too obvious)
Post 22: moonbus enters the chat
Post 23: Off topic from me, it's a waste of time trying to get sense out of mr innocent now, he's gone.
Post 24: "π₯±" As per my long time shag doody advice.
@shavixmir saidYes, the Swedish government allowed it, but *you* questioned why they did
They allowed it numb skull, so they’re not apppeasing anyone.
Jesus, where you dropped on your head and skull-fukked by a kangaroo when you were little, or something?
@shavixmir said "Why the Swedish government would allow it, is beyond me."
Pay attention, brainless wonder
@shavixmir to @Wenjoma : You have no idea what you’re on about.
------------------------
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!! priceless
π π π
@wajoma saidI think you've been a little harsh on the Beaver, Ward π
Freedom lovers (not you shag doody) some inspiring words, "good people, break bad laws." (not you shag doody)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gKHrVROUuQ