Go back
taxing over one billion

taxing over one billion

Debates

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
04 May 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sh76 said
Because big blue chip companies are important parts of the economy.

The 100% billionaires tax means the big companies are capped at 1% of what they are today. That's not a good thing.
The working class is also a big part of the economy but nobody is worrying about motivating them with money.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
04 May 23

@athousandyoung said
The working class is also a big part of the economy but nobody is worrying about motivating them with money.
What do you mean by 'nobody motivating them with money?" The employer uses that very concept to hire people, thousand, so your comment is lost on me, and everyone, for that matter.

Help!!! Next I will have to fence with Kev or Sonhouse for the rest of the day. Not Marauder, he is in the library, deep in thought.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
04 May 23

@averagejoe1 said
What do you mean by 'nobody motivating them with money?" The employer uses that very concept to hire people, thousand, so your comment is lost on me, and everyone, for that matter.

Help!!! Next I will have to fence with Kev or Sonhouse for the rest of the day. Not Marauder, he is in the library, deep in thought.
While the billionaires have been getting vastly richer the working class income has stagnated and the cost of living has decreased.

We’re talking about the government anyway. Why should government be giving preferential “motivational” tax breaks to people who are already getting richer and richer?

In reality it’s because these billionaires have plenty of free time to screw around in politics because they don’t work.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
04 May 23

@athousandyoung said
While the billionaires have been getting vastly richer the working class income has stagnated and the cost of living has decreased.

We’re talking about the government anyway. Why should government be giving preferential “motivational” tax breaks to people who are already getting richer and richer?

In reality it’s because these billionaires have plenty of free time to screw around in politics because they don’t work.
I agree with you, well written. The balance of wealth is way off.
So, here we are. Some of you want to restrict income of genius Biz men.Some of you want govt to divide up companies , workers own a piece of it, share in revenues. Gotta do something. What would you suggest, short of nationalization?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
04 May 23

@averagejoe1 said
I agree with you, well written. The balance of wealth is way off.
So, here we are. Some of you want to restrict income of genius Biz men.Some of you want govt to divide up companies , workers own a piece of it, share in revenues. Gotta do something. What would you suggest, short of nationalization?
Bring the top tax rates back to 70 percent like they were when this country had a strong middle class.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
04 May 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@athousandyoung said
While the billionaires have been getting vastly richer the working class income has stagnated and the cost of living has decreased.

We’re talking about the government anyway. Why should government be giving preferential “motivational” tax breaks to people who are already getting richer and richer?

In reality it’s because these billionaires have plenty of free time to screw around in politics because they don’t work.
*Cost of living has increased

small error

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
04 May 23

@athousandyoung said
Bring the top tax rates back to 70 percent like they were when this country had a strong middle class.
The combined wealth of the 756 billionaires in the USA is $5T. You might say that that is enough to pay off 1/7 of national debt. Right? Think big. Their money would be gone. But, so would they. Are you aware that we need them. ? And China would elicit a lot of money from us, and see that we are weak (as did Putin).
Folks seem to think that rich people can be taxed enough to solve all of our problems. Do you not think it would be better if we concentrated on growth?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54593
Clock
06 May 23

On this subject, liberals have a one-track mind, in that they see the only solution is to get money from the rich. This is Marxism.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9627
Clock
09 May 23

@averagejoe1 said
The combined wealth of the 756 billionaires in the USA is $5T. You might say that that is enough to pay off 1/7 of national debt. Right? Think big. Their money would be gone. But, so would they. Are you aware that we need them. ? And China would elicit a lot of money from us, and see that we are weak (as did Putin).
Folks seem to think that rich people can be ...[text shortened]... ugh to solve all of our problems. Do you not think it would be better if we concentrated on growth?
Joe, you ask for suggestions and when one is provided you ignore it and propose a completely different, ludicrous hyperbolic proposal. This is not debate. 70% is perfectly reasonable.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.