The American Freedom Alliance

Originally posted by FMF
Ah yes, and wouldn't that then make something like industrialized slaughter seem to some like a kind of 'pinnacle of civilization'?

Of course, worthy of celebration in epic poetry or serialised on tv.

Originally posted by xnomanx
Now how about we flip this statement to read:

Not that I'm going to defend what seems like obvious bias, but if Arabs keep getting killed by Jews (like in Palestine), death will continue to put a crimp in the liberty of Arabs.

???

Did Jews kill Arabs in India recently? MAybe the Jew-Controlled-Big-Media didn't report that?

Originally posted by Merk
Did Jews kill Arabs in India recently? MAybe the Jew-Controlled-Big-Media didn't report that?

I don't know what the "Jew-Controlled-Big-Media" you're referring to is.

But to claim that Israeli policy towards Palestinians is not at least partially responsible for the never-ending cycle of violence in the region is completely delusional.

And for the sake of being a gentleman, that is about as nice as I can possibly say it.

Originally posted by xnomanx
I don't know what the "Jew-Controlled-Big-Media" you're referring to is.

But to claim that Israeli policy towards Palestinians is not at least partially responsible for the never-ending cycle of violence in the region is completely delusional.

And for the sake of being a gentleman, that is about as nice as I can possibly say it.

The cycle of violence started long before Israel and regardless, if it was Israel they hated, it makes no sense to attack India.

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
The point is that old saw we've heard since 9/11: all Muslims aren't terrorists, but all the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 ARE MUZZES. That fact simply can't just be swept under the rug. I never hear on the evening news ..."a Jewish suicide bomber detonated her satchel in a crowded street in Haifa today, killing 45 and injuring 112..." or "...a Chr ...[text shortened]... or the kidnapping and beheading of an Al-Jazeera photographer..."
It just don't happen.

It's true that conservative religious terrorists of the Islamic variety seem to outnumber other varieties, but the distinction is not absolute. The Army of God, for example, are a fundamentalist Christian terrorist group that mostly target abortion clinics. The difference is that Western societies have made much more progress in moving away from religious fundamentalism.

Originally posted by FMF
What can we glean about "levels of civilization" from the deployment of cluster bombs, uranium tipped ammunition, landmines, weapons in space, mining harbours, training and equipping death squads, and bombing resdiential apartment blocks, urban water supply infrastructure and TV studios?

WOW!. Can you even glean what uncivilized would be like? Oh yeah, you forgot machetes.

GRANNY.

Originally posted by FMF
Ah yes, and wouldn't that then make something like industrialized slaughter seem to some like a kind of 'pinnacle of civilization'?

There's a critical, begging the question, fallacy in there somewhere.

GRANNY.

Originally posted by Merk
The cycle of violence started long before Israel and regardless, if it was Israel they hated, it makes no sense to attack India.

The bone of contention in those parts is Kashmir.

Originally posted by Merk
Did Jews kill Arabs in India recently? MAybe the Jew-Controlled-Big-Media didn't report that?

No, (Hindu) Indians killed (Muslim) Indians (and vice-versa, back to 1948, and beyond ... ). Don't start acting clueless, Merk.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
No, (Hindu) Indians killed (Muslim) Indians (and vice-versa, back to 1948, and beyond ... ). Don't start acting clueless, Merk.

I'm not acting clueless. I'm pointing out the silliness of claiming that the Israel/Palestine problem is why they attacked India.

And lets not pretend it's only the Hindus that started the violence. I seem to remember someone named Sikandar Butshikan being fairly brutal to his non-coreligionists and the Maharaja acceded to India after Kashmir (dominantly Muslim) was attacked ny Pakistan.

Originally posted by Merk
I'm not acting clueless. I'm pointing out the silliness of claiming that the Israel/Palestine problem is why they attacked India.

And lets not pretend it's only the Hindus that started the violence. I seem to remember someone named Sikandar Butshikan being fairly brutal to his non-coreligionists and the Maharaja acceded to India after Kashmir (dominantly Muslim) was attacked ny Pakistan.

It's all inter-related. Everybody wants their 911.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
It's all inter-related. Everybody wants their 911.

Correction. Everybody want's their 911s to stop.

Edit: And with all sides full of one-delta-ten-tangos, there's no way 911s are going to stop any time soon.

Originally posted by Merk
Correction. Everybody want's their 911s to stop.

William Shatner has much to answer for.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
William Shatner has much to answer for.

The only problem with Canada as far as I can tell.