06 Jan 20
@averagejoe1 saidThanks for the advice...but quite frankly, I dont give a fuk who blasts me...a liberal blasting me is music to my ears.
I note above that there are FIVE thumbs down on the first post. There are five libs on this thread at the moment! You all have been unmasked!!! Write these guys handles down so you will know who is blasting you.. Frankly, I find it rather pansy.
06 Jan 20
@sonhouse saidpissed off about that uranium I guess!
@Earl-of-Trumps
Clearly you cannot handle the truth. Our IT folks found the exact computers the Ruskies used and there are some 20 Russian agents under indictment and yes we know they won't be convicted because they were under orders to hack from Putin himself.
Putin hates Clinton and that is mainly why he meddled in 2016. He has had a hardon against her for decades.
06 Jan 20
@whodey saidGrow up the military and intelligence community have known exactly where the guy was at any given time for years. The question is why now?
I'm sure that a Congress that has opposed Trump on every issue and is trying to impeach him...........without sending it to the Senate, that is, would tell Trump to go ahead with the mission.
Meanwhile, they had literally a few minutes to act where they could actually get to him.
06 Jan 20
@whodey saidLibs won't get the 'few minutes to act' part. Tactics escape them.
I'm sure that a Congress that has opposed Trump on every issue and is trying to impeach him...........without sending it to the Senate, that is, would tell Trump to go ahead with the mission.
Meanwhile, they had literally a few minutes to act where they could actually get to him.
06 Jan 20
@kevcvs57 saidCause our intelligence, (which is fully known to every lib on this thread, where we conservatives get OUR information) our intelligence dictated we move now, that is why. Also , Probably because they were about to waste a few wonderful young men from Kansas................. That is what I got from MY intel.
Grow up the military and intelligence community have known exactly where the guy was at any given time for years. The question is why now?
07 Jan 20
@mott-the-hoople saidHe is feeding worms now, so let us get ready for liberal observation! Popcorn at the ready. Which network do you think? I think I will do MSNBC to watch them get tongue-tied!
question should be why did bush and obama allow him to keep killing
07 Jan 20
@whodey saidBut that was a response to another assassination why ramp up the level of conflict now?
I thought it apparent after the attack on the US embassy
Is it part of a pattern of the US destabilising the region this could result in a resurgence of Isis in the region, perhaps the destabilisation is strategy?
07 Jan 20
@averagejoe1 saidWhere is your evidence that the general was about to attack Kansas?
Cause our intelligence, (which is fully known to every lib on this thread, where we conservatives get OUR information) our intelligence dictated we move now, that is why. Also , Probably because they were about to waste a few wonderful young men from Kansas................. That is what I got from MY intel.
@mott-the-hoople saidNone of that uranium ever left the US. You know that, right?
pissed off about that uranium I guess!
@earl-of-trumps saidBetter than the lies you swallowed about Ukraine.
@mchill
Some of these Congressmen didn't have Mother Russia's help getting elected,
Please please please mchill, tell us the story again. Tell us how the Russians helped somebody get elected.
I dare ya lol
@averagejoe1 saidSchiff is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, fool.
well, hold on now, McHill. One simple problem Trump had is that Shchiff is a proven leaker. You will recall Obama took out Osama, who was not as dangerous as Soloyami, without congressional approval. So, in this one sentence, you see two reasons why it was the best decision.....the way Trump handled it.
This congressman cannot, could not, be trusted. Throw us another one.
@averagejoe1 saidIgnoring the Constitution AGAIN?
Read up, Deep. It is settled matter that the congress, who was not informed or asked for approval...(How do you think THAT would have gone!! 😆) did not have a requirement that the Donald ask them for approval, or even BE notilfied.
Move along from that.......it is settled.
@averagejoe1 saidSettle down, snowflake.
I note above that there are FIVE thumbs down on the first post. There are five libs on this thread at the moment! You all have been unmasked!!! Write these guys handles down so you will know who is blasting you.. Frankly, I find it rather pansy.