The prez. debate

Originally posted by sh76
Until the September collapse, McCain was practically even money to win ...

Is this a euphemism for when the general public worked out everyone's favorite soccer mum only spoke stupid?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Someone thought long and hard... yet still came to the conclusion you were a topic significant enough to sport?
That's just weird.
You're so pedantic, you refuse to talk to yourself.

Or do you?

Originally posted by whodey
If you really want to rattle Hilary, put someone in the front row that looks EXACTLY like Vince Foster.

There are family members who Hillary called liars for saying she blamed the video could be called too.

Originally posted by KellyJay
There are family members who Hillary called liars for saying she blamed the video could be called too.

She might not recognize any of them, but even if she did she can always reach into her tool box of tricks and pull out 'Old Reliable'.

( otherwise known as plausible deniability )

Originally posted by lemon lime
She might not recognize any of them, but even if she did she can always reach into her tool box of tricks and pull out 'Old Reliable'.

( otherwise known as plausible deniability )

I imagine she will use that 25% of the night.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

The green party has an anti-vaccination fraction???

Good grief.

Originally posted by KellyJay
There are family members who Hillary called liars for saying she blamed the video could be called too.

I think you will find that in the next Presidential debate nothing will change. The same tired voices defending Hillary and saying she may be a liar but not as bad as Donald will be singing the same song and dance in regard to the next GOP nominee.

I believe the term is partisan shill.

Originally posted by KellyJay
There are family members who Hillary called liars for saying she blamed the video could be called too.

Well, the Clinton campaign could seat all the people that Trump U. screwed out of their money, but I doubt if Donald would even recognize any of them.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Well, the Clinton campaign could seat all the people that Trump U. screwed out of their money, but I doubt if Donald would even recognize any of them.

With someone that is that rich and powerful there is no justice.

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
She's an anti-vaxxer.

That is simply not so. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jul/30/jill-stein-green-party-vaccinations-anti-vaxxers

I think concerns over the amount of influence that corporate interests have over any regulatory agencies are valid. I personally think, though I do not know if Jill Stein does, that mandatory vaccination laws are no longer necessary and that in some cases the vaccinations themselves are far more likely to cause health problems than not getting vaccinated for rare diseases. We have discussed this before and stats from the CDC support that conclusion.

EDIT: The thread is here: https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/should-vaccines-be-mandatory.159834

The CDC stats regarding the MNR vaccine are given on page 3. See also my "green bean" analogy at the bottom of p. 8.

Originally posted by KellyJay
I imagine she will use that 25% of the night.

I'm not sure if 25% is too high or too low, because we can also factor in implausible deniability. For some strange reason that seems to have worked for her as well.

Wo, I just noticed the time! Kick off is less than an hour and a half from now.

Originally posted by shavixmir
The green party has an anti-vaccination fraction???

Good grief.

I'm not aware of any though undoubtedly a few members of the party might have such views. The list that appears here seems mostly of celebrities and right wingish groups like Infowars.http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anti-vaccination_movement#cite_note-23

Note Donald Trump is one of them.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/sep/17/donald-trump-vaccines-autism-debate

Originally posted by no1marauder
That is simply not so. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/jul/30/jill-stein-green-party-vaccinations-anti-vaxxers

I think concerns over the amount of influence that corporate interests have over any regulatory agencies are valid. I personally think, though I do not know if Jill Stein does, that mandatory vaccination laws are no longer necessary ...[text shortened]... ing the MNR vaccine are given on page 3. See also my "green bean" analogy at the bottom of p. 8.

I have heard the view that the problem with vaccines such as MMR is not the vaccines themselves but that they contain mercury (thiomersal/thimerosal), use of mercury is being phased out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(element)#Medicine