142d
@AverageJoe1 saidMaybe you should have tried to get higher than a "D" in English in school.
@sonhouse
Hard to follow Sonhouse
@KellyJay saidOh, come on.
Complete information requires a thorough understanding of all sides of a discussion, blocking one point of view out by canceling or calling it disinformation when it simply disagrees with one side limits our understanding. We have to know the strengths and weaknesses of our points of view and we will never get that if all we hear are those we agree with telling us what we want to hear.
I've read enough of your posts regarding "truth" vs. lies to know that you know there IS a difference, even if you can't tell exactly what is truth and what is lies.
142d
@AverageJoe1 saidI was referring to your own admission that you find posts you don't like "hard to understand".
I meant ‘follow him’ as in your having to make a speech right after Reagan makes a speech. Hard act to follow,
However, you’d have no problem following Kamala!,!
142d
@Suzianne saidYou write as though corps have an obligation to us. That smacks of socialism. Even if we do not go to socialism under you people, the act of telling corporations (rather than socialistic ownership given to the “People&rdquo😉 how and what to do , is regulation. Socialism in sheep’s clothing.
You need to give less attention to corporations who lie, and as a consequence, think they deserve obscene profits over regular profits. They also seem to think that they are God-driven to do this in order to make the current president, whom they despise because he dares to regulate them, look bad. Corporations have far greater control over prices than do political leaders. ...[text shortened]... orate CEOs are doing very, very well in this supposedly "bad" economy. Bad for you = good for them.
Also, you say obscene profits. Who defines obscene? Same guy who decides what a ‘fair share’ is?
142d
@sonhouse saidYou bring Trump's name into something that has nothing to do with Trump, I'm not avoiding your points, your points are just your opinions and I don't care to discuss your opinions. You are free to have them and express them, just do not think I'm going to entertain them when they have NOTHING to do with the thread.
@KellyJay
So you continue to distract from my charges. OF COURSE he is in our minds on a daily basis. ANYONE who says they will be a dictator on day one will have our full attention. ANYONE who spouts off to an Aussie billionaire about how close we can get to a Russian sub undetected gets our full attention.
The fact you give him a bye on ALL of it is REALLY disturbing, I ...[text shortened]... and if you think that is ok you are in far worse shape mentally than anything you charge against me.
142d
@AverageJoe1 saidJust stop. You're embarrassing yourself.
You write as though corps have an obligation to us. That smacks of socialism. Even if we do not go to socialism under you people, the act of telling corporations (rather than socialistic ownership given to the “People&rdquo😉 how and what to do , is regulation. Socialism in sheep’s clothing.
Also, you say obscene profits. Who defines obscene? Same guy who decides what a ‘fair share’ is?
Such slavish devotion to the rich. Disgusting.
142d
@AverageJoe1
https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/admissions/Examinations/February2024CBXessayQsandAnswer.pdf
There is a bunch of sample essay questions from the California bar exam. Try the one from Feb 2024, about the auto repair garage and Wendy getting title to her house and husband getting an auto repair business based on a document with Wendy's forged signature.
Lets see your response to that common sense question.