Go back
Thought crimes

Thought crimes

Debates

STS

Joined
07 Feb 07
Moves
62961
Clock
12 Sep 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
So if I SEE someone committing a crime, and I don't report it, am I guilty of a crime? As I understand it, in some states I am; others, no.
That is correct. But even in states that don't require you to report it, if it is a particularly heinous crime, you might be charged with a "depraved indifference".
Like if you saw someone beating a newborn infant with a club and just said oh well not my business.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
13 Sep 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
So if I SEE someone committing a crime, and I don't report it, am I guilty of a crime? As I understand it, in some states I am; others, no.
I believe that that is not correct. I don't believe that you are guilty of a crime in any state. It is certainly not conspiracy, which requires an agreement and intent to achieve the criminal objective. The last episode of Seinfeld notwithstanding, there is no affirmative duty to act under American criminal law. In addition, obstruction of justice applies only if you affirmative cover up the crime, destroy evidence or lie to the police.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
13 Sep 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Like if you saw someone beating a newborn infant with a club and just said oh well not my business.
As morally reprehensible as your actions in standing by and doing nothing are, you are not guilty of a crime under American criminal law. Unless of course, it was your infant or there is some other special relationship or circumstance that gives you the duty to act. It's possible that there are states that might consider that a crime, but I don't know of any and I don't think that there are any.

P

weedhopper

Joined
25 Jul 07
Moves
8096
Clock
13 Sep 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
I believe that that is not correct. I don't believe that you are guilty of a crime in any state. It is certainly not conspiracy, which requires an agreement and intent to achieve the criminal objective. The last episode of Seinfeld notwithstanding, there is no affirmative duty to act under American criminal law. In addition, obstruction of justice applies only if you affirmative cover up the crime, destroy evidence or lie to the police.
I'm pretty sure a man in Nevada was prosecuted several years ago because he witnessed a man take a child into a public restroom--said man either kidnapped and/or abused this boy.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
13 Sep 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
I'm pretty sure a man in Nevada was prosecuted several years ago because he witnessed a man take a child into a public restroom--said man either kidnapped and/or abused this boy.
I'd be interested in seeing that case if you could find it.

P

weedhopper

Joined
25 Jul 07
Moves
8096
Clock
14 Sep 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
I'd be interested in seeing that case if you could find it.
So would I. I did a couple of searches, but no luck.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
14 Sep 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
So would I. I did a couple of searches, but no luck.
Maybe the guy was the lookout for the abuser/kidnapper.

P

weedhopper

Joined
25 Jul 07
Moves
8096
Clock
14 Sep 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Maybe the guy was the lookout for the abuser/kidnapper.
Possible. As I remember the story though, the controversy was an "am I my brother's keeper" type of argument. A man sees something that MAY be suspicious--is he required to report it to the authorities? That's the kind of editorials I remember from the story, but again--it was years ago and I can't find anything on it.

D
incipit parodia

Joined
01 Aug 07
Moves
46580
Clock
16 Sep 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

This all rang a bell - I seem to recall both France and Germany have laws that require one to provide assistance to a person in danger. I was double-checking my memory was not in error, and wound up on Wikipedia.

Now, wary as I am of taking anything there at face value, I was intrigued by the statement that "contrary to common law, eight states [in the US] have laws requiring people to help strangers in peril" (although "These laws are rarely applied, and are generally ignored by citizens and lawmakers".) There's references to follow up.

As I say, I was simply intrigued by this - is Wikipedia (again) in error? Or are the laws so unenforced as to be to all intents and purposes lapsed?

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
16 Sep 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DrKF
This all rang a bell - I seem to recall both France and Germany have laws that require one to provide assistance to a person in danger. I was double-checking my memory was not in error, and wound up on Wikipedia.

Now, wary as I am of taking anything there at face value, I was intrigued by the statement that "contrary to common law, eight states [in th ...[text shortened]... again) in error? Or are the laws so unenforced as to be to all intents and purposes lapsed?
Don't know about Germany, but France certainly has.

Most European nations have laws in place that if you have a first-aid certificate, you are required to give assistance as well.

I let mine go out of date in case I'd have to help a conservative.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.