17 Feb 07
1 edit
Originally posted by theprotectorsI ain't scared of playin' chess with anybody.
Maybee you all are scared of the nonsubscribers because they are kicking your behind to kingdom come.
Just a thought!!!!🙂
I love chess.
The Soft G
p.s. Subscribers!, please make sure you vote for my pirate poll. Thread 63062
17 Feb 07
1 edit
Originally posted by Amaurote'friends'?
Some of my best friends are non-subscribers. Having said that, I feel it only fair to point out that they are responsible for 95% of all cashpoint crime, and only bathe once every other year.
as in 'real life friends'?
I'll PM you my sisters' phone number. She needs to go out more as well.
19 Feb 07
Originally posted by GinoJMean and unethical? No. But I don't know why you would make this decision. Seems pointless to me.
That's the question.
I decided not to play non-subscribers if I do not know them from the forums or in person.
Is it mean and unethical to discriminate the starless members like this?
Debate.
19 Feb 07
the issue here is whether you think a star will make you a better person. i could pay those 5$, but still be a bastard, timing you out, cursing you in the game chat, taking days to move but still moving just in time to avoid timeout etc. a star isn't the mark of a nice person, it is just the mark of a person who likes chess and thinks that 6 games are not enough.
i don't have time for more than 6 games so i probably won't get a star in the foreseeable future. so does that make me scum?
19 Feb 07
Originally posted by ZahlanziYes, but not just that.
the issue here is whether you think a star will make you a better person. i could pay those 5$, but still be a bastard, timing you out, cursing you in the game chat, taking days to move but still moving just in time to avoid timeout etc. a star isn't the mark of a nice person, it is just the mark of a person who likes chess and thinks that 6 games are not e ...[text shortened]... 6 games so i probably won't get a star in the foreseeable future. so does that make me scum?
Everything else too...
22 Feb 07
Originally posted by knightwestperhaps this is the reason why non-subs shouldn't play subs, because they be stuck-up scum?
Yes, but not just that.
Everything else too...
of course i call subs scum based on the observation of just one person, you, but you don't seem to mind
23 Feb 07
Originally posted by theprotectorsThere are only two non subs in the top 30 rated players.
Maybee you all are scared of the nonsubscribers because they are kicking your behind to kingdom come.
Just a thought!!!!🙂
A quick check confirms they are former subs.
The highest rated real non sub is 37th.
02 Mar 07
Originally posted by Diet Cokeit is only logical. those that are good and have the time to develop their rating will probably want to give the bucks to get a star. if you only play casual, then you are too lazy to pay the dollars.
There are only two non subs in the top 30 rated players.
A quick check confirms they are former subs.
The highest rated real non sub is 37th.
now that i finally got a job(me lazy government freeloader) i might get a star. and according to some, that would make me a wonderful person, a model citizen and really, really nice
02 Mar 07
Originally posted by ZahlanziYou got all the ladies too...😵
it is only logical. those that are good and have the time to develop their rating will probably want to give the bucks to get a star. if you only play casual, then you are too lazy to pay the dollars.
now that i finally got a job(me lazy government freeloader) i might get a star. and according to some, that would make me a wonderful person, a model citizen and really, really nice
Or men if that's the way you swing.