@AverageJoe1 saidThe boring, Neverending "taxation is theft" bleating.
No I don’t understand it. You see, she has the same logic that Machine Gun Kelly had, when asked why he robs banks. …His answer was that is where the money is. So Kamala is going to find out where the money is, that someone has accumulated in their name, which means it belong to them. She’s going to send some jackbooted thugs to his house and get his money. You cannot den ...[text shortened]... s wrong. It would be nice if you could have a discussion simply along those lines. But you will not.
Since it's been addressed at least a thousand times on this Forum, I'm not going to waste my time responding to it.
@no1marauder saidI hate it for you, you are truly the worst debater On the forum.
The boring, Neverending "taxation is theft" bleating.
Since it's been addressed at least a thousand times on this Forum, I'm not going to waste my time responding to it.
Ask me a question. If it’s a genuine question, I will answer it, no matter how many times I have been asked the question.
Show us your stuff and answer this very very, very simple question. And be honest about where the money comes from. It seems like you want to take it from one person and give it to another. Why can you not discuss that quite simply.
@no1marauder saidCurious that you use the word thief or theft. I have not done that. You can call it what you want, the taking from one person giving to another, it could just be redistribution. So what ever it is do you think it is, moral or right for someone mining their own business to have money taken away from
The boring, Neverending "taxation is theft" bleating.
Since it's been addressed at least a thousand times on this Forum, I'm not going to waste my time responding to it.
them and give them to someone else. It seems that you want to call that theft. Is it
@AverageJoe1 saidAgain, non sequitur.
No I don’t understand it. You see, she has the same logic that Machine Gun Kelly had, when asked why he robs banks. …His answer was that is where the money is. So Kamala is going to find out where the money is, that someone has accumulated in their name, which means it belong to them. She’s going to send some jackbooted thugs to his house and get his money. You cannot den ...[text shortened]... s wrong. It would be nice if you could have a discussion simply along those lines. But you will not.
You make bizarre connections between things totally unrelated.
@AverageJoe1
Ah, you mean the job of government is to FUUK over people instead of helping them. Glad you admitted that.
Then Trump will do a FINE job as POTUS again. Starting with putting 3 times as many children in cages this time, coming from Steve Miller whom he would make AG so he can have his own personal hammer to hit his critics with and jail any political opponent, just like, wait a minute, I will think of it, let's see, oh yes, just like Stalin, just like Hitler, just like Pol Pot, yeah, THAT kind of hammer.
And he LOVES Kim Jon Un, don't forget AND thinks Putin is a GENIUS.
@sonhouse saidYou already posted this.
@AverageJoe1
Ah, you mean the job of government is to FUUK over people instead of helping them. Glad you admitted that.
Then Trump will do a FINE job as POTUS again. Starting with putting 3 times as many children in cages this time, coming from Steve Miller whom he would make AG so he can have his own personal hammer to hit his critics with and jail any political opponent, ...[text shortened]... Pot, yeah, THAT kind of hammer.
And he LOVES Kim Jon Un, don't forget AND thinks Putin is a GENIUS.
While I have you, why do you and Shav avoid uncomfortable questions?
And why are they uncomfortable? If we were sitting at a table at Starbucks, would you just storm out?
@AverageJoe1
Why do YOU totally disregard anything we say about the PROVEN IN COURT BY UNBIASED JURISTS Trump is a criminal DOZENS OF TIMES OVER for a number of crimes from paying a porn star and trying to hide it from the government AND the voters just before an election to outright TREASON talking about how close our subs can get undetected to a Russian sub, you think what, that never happened?
Kiss my ass if that's what you think. That happened AND MUCH MORE yet you let a traitor like Trump off the hook again and again, thinking treason is no reason for a dude to refuse to elect him as POTUS again.
I guess you would be ok with the Rosenbergs, either one of them, being eligible to be POTUS, eh.