236d
@mott-the-hoople saidWith my every post, I have this underlying '"How can these people stand behind Joe Biden for 4 more years, where they fully know that the WH is run 90% by people in their 20s, with big plans to socialize the United States of America."" That would be all of our left posters; They fallow the mantra of Kamala Harris. ".....just as long as, at the end of the day, we all end up in the same place'.
takes a lowlife pos to cheer on such corruption as this
Should not one strive to have their own place?
236d
@averagejoe1 saidWhy don't you make your "own place" in a thread where such drivel is actually on-topic?
With my every post, I have this underlying '"How can these people stand behind Joe Biden for 4 more years, where they fully know that the WH is run 90% by people in their 20s, with big plans to socialize the United States of America."" That would be all of our left posters; They fallow the mantra of Kamala Harris. ".....just as long as, at the end of the day, we all end up in the same place'.
Should not one strive to have their own place?
236d
@moonbus saidThe rules of evidence are basically the same with some exceptions, most notably in what a defendant can be questioned about if he takes the stand (no matter what he says, Trump won't).
It's less the case that's "notorious" (falsifying business records isn't all that uncommon), it's more the defendant. It's hard for Trump to accept that, as far as the court is concerned, he's not a former president and not the presumptive front runner for the presidency either -- he's John Doe, just plain John Doe.
Am I correct that this being a criminal case and not a ci ...[text shortened]... es of evidence are tighter (i.e., tougher to get a conviction)?
May cool and level heads prevail.
The standard for a conviction is, of course, higher than that for a finding of civil liability being "beyond a reasonable doubt" rather than a "preponderance of evidence".
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147479
236d
@no1marauder saidwell it’s unheard of being off topic on this board 😂
Why don't you make your "own place" in a thread where such drivel is actually on-topic?
squeak a little louder
236d
@moonbus said"Please stay on topic".
The 'victims' are all the corporations which did not falsify their records and were thereby unfairly disadvantaged by the cheater.
That is why a chess player who cheats with an engine is barred from an entire tournament, instead of having merely his one cheated-game result annulled.
The 'victim' is the integrity of the system.
RHP Posting Guidelines.
Rude and ignorant is SOP for right wingers here.
236d
@averagejoe1 saidStop lying, already.
With my every post, I have this underlying '"How can these people stand behind Joe Biden for 4 more years, where they fully know that the WH is run 90% by people in their 20s, with big plans to socialize the United States of America."" That would be all of our left posters; They fallow the mantra of Kamala Harris. ".....just as long as, at the end of the day, we all end up in the same place'.
Should not one strive to have their own place?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147479
236d
@no1marauder saidsqueak a little louder 😂
"Please stay on topic".
RHP Posting Guidelines.
Rude and ignorant is SOP for right wingers here.
236d
@mott-the-hoople saidHe's on trial for his corruption, fool.
takes a lowlife pos to cheer on such corruption as this
@no1marauder saidYeah, here it is . He wrote it a few clicks up, just before he talked down to all of you as if he thinks he is a professor at Harvard.
Why don't you make your "own place" in a thread where such drivel is actually on-topic?
He has a Lexis Nexis, all paralegals have one.
236d
@AverageJoe1
Funny I thought these were YOUR issues. You just reposted a Faux news article. You may agree with them but they are not YOUR thoughts they are just repaved propaganda. But you don't seem to know the difference. I KNOW what my issues are and I don't need to call on a fake news channel known to publish bullshyte daily and actually had to pay near a half BILLION in fines for literally lying on the air.
236d
@averagejoe1 saidStop framing.
No one, including Marauder, believe for ONE Second that this is not political. Evidence is quite clear that said he was going to get Trump, and would Find Something to charge him with. Russian saying: “Find me the man ,I will find the crime”
Please, no disingenuous stuff, Marauder.
It makes you look like you don’t grasp what is being said…
235d
@shavixmir saidSorry. But a simple question, for you. Do you think the chargfes against Trump are politically motivated, or, NOT politically motivated?
Stop framing.
It makes you look like you don’t grasp what is being said…