289d
@sh76 saidYeah sure the senate could definitely get 60 votes for impeachment 🙄
Do you think Donald Trump even understands, let alone thought of, the legal arguments his counsel is making?
In any case, what the lawyer said was ""He would have to be and would speedily be impeached and convicted before the criminal prosecution," Sauer responded.
That's not exactly the same thing as "should be able to murder."
If trump does not understand what absolute immunity means even after his lawyers spelled out in a public court then the electorate can stop worrying about Biden’s intellectual capacities and start worrying about trump idiocy
@mott-the-hoople saidYeah as long as they know exactly what a narcissistic ball bag your guy is and he gets held to the same laws as everyone else
so you are not ok with THE PEOPLE choosing who they want as president?
For me my nations proudest day was when we cut a kings head off, I assumed yours was when you overthrew a king as your head of state. My how you’ve changed.
288d
@averagejoe1 saidRead the ink retard it was an accident which happened to American nationals who for some reason were in Yemen.
@kevcvs57
Obama killed Americans with drones. Are y'all gonna ignore that while you write this drivel?
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/holder-weve-droned-4-americans-3-by-accident-oops/
We are talking about trump wanting the right to kill domestic political opponents and being free to walk away unless the bipartisan miracle of impeachment occurs.
You really need to work harder on this gotcha debating style Joe
288d
@kevcvs57 saidI find it funny the way you fellers discuss your baseless inane legal reasoning of the goings on. I don't know anything about cooking, but when that issue comes up, I will b discussing it like crazy. And also buying in to the idiocy of you libs, like Trump seriously thinks presidents should be able to murder. Y'all get after me a lot for a few misstatements, but I am so behind in trying to teach you boys about debate that I lose my place. I ain't THINKING about discussing Trump's plans to murder. Y'all have at it.
Yeah sure the senate could definitely get 60 votes for impeachment 🙄
If trump does not understand what absolute immunity means even after his lawyers spelled out in a public court then the electorate can stop worrying about Biden’s intellectual capacities and start worrying about trump idiocy
Silly. How bout getting Shav and Sonhouse to answer questions I posed to them? Much more entertaining. Do you think I would absorb these inane conversations? Trump is smarter than his lawyers, he knows what he is doing (obviously) so your post here is meaningless, as an example. Geez
288d
@kevcvs57 saidSame laws as everyone else? Hunter? Do you think he will do time for his proven crimes, tax evasion, etc? Same laws as everyone else? You see how pitiful your screed is. You are getting like Sonhouse.
Yeah as long as they know exactly what a narcissistic ball bag your guy is and he gets held to the same laws as everyone else
For me my nations proudest day was when we cut a kings head off, I assumed yours was when you overthrew a king as your head of state. My how you’ve changed.
288d
@vivify saidBe specific about your charges here. I aint thinking about reading all these posts. Put it in plain English, not Suzy glibness or Mchill cleverness, and I would respond. There is nothing to hook into with all this foolishness. Lord, even SHouse is weighing in, the thread is a shotgun mess.
It's not even that; it's just "whatabout". Mott also deflected from Trump to "whatabout" Obama.
The pissant Djj deflected from Trump to talk about Nancy Pelosi....'s brother.
Sad lot.