Go back
US Elections - no point in voting!

US Elections - no point in voting!

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
Except Bliar's not elected as prime minister by the electorate.
yes, but thats ENGLAND where people are moderately SMARTER... AMERICA, on the other hand, have an idiot to represent them, and he portrays what theyre like very wel (actually, im American so dont go calling me rascist or anything)

Vote Up
Vote Down

I think it is decided by weenie length

😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Even if u do vote, they'll just change it to Bush anyway. I can't believe the Florida fiasco hasn't led to any tightening of rules/regulations. It seems that things have gotten worse with electronic voting machines installed by one of the Bush's crony companies. No paper trail = Bush victory, simple as that.

D
Which fiasco are you talking about? The one where Gore prevented the absentee ballots of thousands of soldiers stationed overseas who voted 80% in Bush's favor or the one where the dummies complained that they punched the wrong place on the ballot. If Gore had won his home state Tennessee, Florida wouldn't have mattered. Tennesseans know what a dumbass Gore is. Thats why they didn't vote for him.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by elvendreamgirl
I think it is decided by weenie length

😀
Is that why woman are so badly represented in US politiics?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by joshmanpixi
Actually, its the UK, not England.
The sooner England has its own prime minister, the better. For now, though, Bliar is the prime minister of the UK.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by StarValleyWy
How come he isn't president then?

Does your lack of knowledge of the system invalidate it?
Because you can win by cheating. If you are caught cheating in almost any game you become an instant loser; too bad these elections aren't games.

Vote Up
Vote Down

always thought it was the amount of royal blood that determined the winner. hehe.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by amethyst deceiver
always thought it was the amount of royal blood that determined the winner. hehe.
and here's the link... enjoy! haha.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5723115/

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DreamlaX
Because you can win by cheating. If you are caught cheating in almost any game you become an instant loser; too bad these elections aren't games.
Bush did not cheat, he had more votes in the electoral college. Though he did lose in the popular vote. In case your wondering what the electoral college is....each state gets an certain number of electors which is equal to the number of its senators and representatives. If there happens to be a tie the election is moved to the House of Representatives where each state gets one vote.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chaswray
Not untill after the election😲 Kind shoots a hole in that theory unless they were talking about last season?
Actually, I heard this story again. It's the last home game, and the Redskins lost, so Bush should lose.
Doesn't look likely from what I'm hearing.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.