Go back
US Elections - no point in voting!

US Elections - no point in voting!

Debates

j

your basement.

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
297
Clock
24 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
Except Bliar's not elected as prime minister by the electorate.
yes, but thats ENGLAND where people are moderately SMARTER... AMERICA, on the other hand, have an idiot to represent them, and he portrays what theyre like very wel (actually, im American so dont go calling me rascist or anything)

e

Joined
03 Dec 03
Moves
25735
Clock
25 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think it is decided by weenie length

😀

s
Death from Above

El Paso, TX

Joined
27 Oct 02
Moves
47338
Clock
25 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Even if u do vote, they'll just change it to Bush anyway. I can't believe the Florida fiasco hasn't led to any tightening of rules/regulations. It seems that things have gotten worse with electronic voting machines installed by one of the Bush's crony companies. No paper trail = Bush victory, simple as that.

D
Which fiasco are you talking about? The one where Gore prevented the absentee ballots of thousands of soldiers stationed overseas who voted 80% in Bush's favor or the one where the dummies complained that they punched the wrong place on the ballot. If Gore had won his home state Tennessee, Florida wouldn't have mattered. Tennesseans know what a dumbass Gore is. Thats why they didn't vote for him.

s
Death from Above

El Paso, TX

Joined
27 Oct 02
Moves
47338
Clock
25 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

s
Red Republican

Auckland

Joined
08 Jun 03
Moves
6680
Clock
25 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by elvendreamgirl
I think it is decided by weenie length

😀
Is that why woman are so badly represented in US politiics?

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
25 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by joshmanpixi
Actually, its the UK, not England.
The sooner England has its own prime minister, the better. For now, though, Bliar is the prime minister of the UK.

D

Wellington, NZ

Joined
08 Jan 04
Moves
4274
Clock
25 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by StarValleyWy
How come he isn't president then?

Does your lack of knowledge of the system invalidate it?
Because you can win by cheating. If you are caught cheating in almost any game you become an instant loser; too bad these elections aren't games.

ad

Joined
17 Aug 04
Moves
1260
Clock
25 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

always thought it was the amount of royal blood that determined the winner. hehe.

ad

Joined
17 Aug 04
Moves
1260
Clock
25 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by amethyst deceiver
always thought it was the amount of royal blood that determined the winner. hehe.
and here's the link... enjoy! haha.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5723115/

T

Joined
25 Oct 04
Moves
84
Clock
27 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DreamlaX
Because you can win by cheating. If you are caught cheating in almost any game you become an instant loser; too bad these elections aren't games.
Bush did not cheat, he had more votes in the electoral college. Though he did lose in the popular vote. In case your wondering what the electoral college is....each state gets an certain number of electors which is equal to the number of its senators and representatives. If there happens to be a tie the election is moved to the House of Representatives where each state gets one vote.

V
Thinking...

Odersfelt

Joined
20 Jan 03
Moves
14580
Clock
03 Nov 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chaswray
Not untill after the election😲 Kind shoots a hole in that theory unless they were talking about last season?
Actually, I heard this story again. It's the last home game, and the Redskins lost, so Bush should lose.
Doesn't look likely from what I'm hearing.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.